SWCR-32: SF 1.9.1 JA after 652 games the new Number *1*

[Frank Quisinsky]

Hi Swami,

could you add the link to your SF 1.8.0 JA w32 and 1.9.1 JA w32 test. Perhaps you have the results from version 1.7.1 JA w32 too. After my SWCR test version 1.7.1 JA w32 is better as version 1.8.0 JA w32.

I like your position test and it make sense to compare our results.

Best
Frank

[swami]

Hi Swami,

could you add the link to your SF 1.8.0 JA w32 and 1.9.1 JA w32 test. Perhaps you have the results from version 1.7.1 JA w32 too. After my SWCR test version 1.7.1 JA w32 is better as version 1.8.0 JA w32.

I like your position test and it make sense to compare our results.

Best
Frank

You're right, Frank. STS Test results agrees with your results!

Stockfish 1.9
808/1000
http://talkchess.com/forum/viewtopic.ph ... 05&t=36239

Stockfish 1.7.1
796/1000

http://talkchess.com/forum/viewtopic.ph ... 47&t=33732

Stockfish 1.8
787/1000
http://talkchess.com/forum/viewtopic.ph ... 85&t=35246

Best wishes,
Swami

[Frank Quisinsky]

Hi Swami,

OK, thanks!

Question:
Could you now start the STS test with SF 1.9.1 JA (200.000 bytes version from Jim Ablett, means not the 333.000 bytes version SF 1.9.0 JA). I am sure you will get a highter result !!!

SF 1.9.1 JA ... the w32 version!
This would be great!!

Best
Frank

[gerold]

i'm not sure how you managed to produce such results and to make such a claim because on my 32bit system rybka 4 is still way ahead of stockfish 1.9.1. the gap is narrowing but it is still considerably behind rybka by my own limited testing at any rate.

CCRL 32-bit 1CPU testing gives Rybka 4 and Stockfish 1.9.1 as almost equal in strength too.

Cheers,
Graham.

On the CCRL 2 cpu 32. SF 1.9.1 is a lot weaker than R4.
I still have SF 1.9.1. after about 300 games at 5/3 TC
45 elo weaker than R4 w32.
I have it about as strong as R3 or a little weaker. Wish i had
the stronger version of SF. 1.9.1. .

Best,
Gerold.