Chessbase articles questioning the Rybka ban

[Graham Banks]

I guess that as long as members can keep the discussion civilised, these articles can be discussed here, so let's try again.

Part One
http://www.chessbase.com/newsdetail.asp?newsid=7791

Part Two
http://www.chessbase.com/newsdetail.asp?newsid=7807

Part Three
http://www.chessbase.com/newsdetail.asp?newsid=7811

[Harvey Williamson]

I guess that as long as members can keep the discussion civilised, these articles can be discussed here, so let's try again.

Part One
http://www.chessbase.com/newsdetail.asp?newsid=7791

Part Two
http://www.chessbase.com/newsdetail.asp?newsid=7807

Part Three
http://www.chessbase.com/newsdetail.asp?newsid=7811

I think Roger is out of control for whatever reason and apart from the racist remarks all the previous discussions should stand. Wow I agree with Ed!

[Graham Banks]

I guess that as long as members can keep the discussion civilised, these articles can be discussed here, so let's try again.

Part One
http://www.chessbase.com/newsdetail.asp?newsid=7791

Part Two
http://www.chessbase.com/newsdetail.asp?newsid=7807

Part Three
http://www.chessbase.com/newsdetail.asp?newsid=7811

The final part is there now:
http://www.chessbase.com/newsdetail.asp?newsid=7813

[h1a8]

I guess that as long as members can keep the discussion civilised, these articles can be discussed here, so let's try again.

Part One
http://www.chessbase.com/newsdetail.asp?newsid=7791

Part Two
http://www.chessbase.com/newsdetail.asp?newsid=7807

Part Three
http://www.chessbase.com/newsdetail.asp?newsid=7811

The final part is there now:
http://www.chessbase.com/newsdetail.asp?newsid=7813

I have read much of it and I must say WOW! That puts things in a different perspective for me.

In the very least.
The punishment doesn't fit the crime at all.

[geots]

I guess that as long as members can keep the discussion civilised, these articles can be discussed here, so let's try again.

Part One
http://www.chessbase.com/newsdetail.asp?newsid=7791

Part Two
http://www.chessbase.com/newsdetail.asp?newsid=7807

Part Three
http://www.chessbase.com/newsdetail.asp?newsid=7811

The final part is there now:
http://www.chessbase.com/newsdetail.asp?newsid=7813

I have read much of it and I must say WOW! That puts things in a different perspective for me.

In the very least.
The punishment doesn't fit the crime at all.

And what crime would that be?

Regards,

george

[Terry McCracken]

I guess that as long as members can keep the discussion civilised, these articles can be discussed here, so let's try again.

Part One
http://www.chessbase.com/newsdetail.asp?newsid=7791

Part Two
http://www.chessbase.com/newsdetail.asp?newsid=7807

Part Three
http://www.chessbase.com/newsdetail.asp?newsid=7811

The final part is there now:
http://www.chessbase.com/newsdetail.asp?newsid=7813

I have read much of it and I must say WOW! That puts things in a different perspective for me.

In the very least.
The punishment doesn't fit the crime at all.

And what crime would that be?

Regards,

george

Code theft and breaching the GPL. Not that you care.

[slobo]

I guess that as long as members can keep the discussion civilised, these articles can be discussed here, so let's try again.

Part One
http://www.chessbase.com/newsdetail.asp?newsid=7791

Part Two
http://www.chessbase.com/newsdetail.asp?newsid=7807

Part Three
http://www.chessbase.com/newsdetail.asp?newsid=7811

I hope you look after handicapped children (you are their teacher, aren´t you?) as much as you do it concerning Rybka software.

[Harvey Williamson]

I guess that as long as members can keep the discussion civilised, these articles can be discussed here, so let's try again.

Part One
http://www.chessbase.com/newsdetail.asp?newsid=7791

Part Two
http://www.chessbase.com/newsdetail.asp?newsid=7807

Part Three
http://www.chessbase.com/newsdetail.asp?newsid=7811

I hope you look after handicapped children (you are their teacher, aren´t you?) as much as you do it concerning Rybka software.

What a ridiculous post. Graham maybe misguided in his support for Vas but your post makes me feel sick.

[mar]

I guess that as long as members can keep the discussion civilised, these articles can be discussed here, so let's try again.

Part One
http://www.chessbase.com/newsdetail.asp?newsid=7791

Part Two
http://www.chessbase.com/newsdetail.asp?newsid=7807

Part Three
http://www.chessbase.com/newsdetail.asp?newsid=7811

I hope you look after handicapped children (you are their teacher, aren´t you?) as much as you do it concerning Rybka software.

You should change your nick to lobo

[h1a8]

I guess that as long as members can keep the discussion civilised, these articles can be discussed here, so let's try again.

Part One
http://www.chessbase.com/newsdetail.asp?newsid=7791

Part Two
http://www.chessbase.com/newsdetail.asp?newsid=7807

Part Three
http://www.chessbase.com/newsdetail.asp?newsid=7811

The final part is there now:
http://www.chessbase.com/newsdetail.asp?newsid=7813

I have read much of it and I must say WOW! That puts things in a different perspective for me.

In the very least.
The punishment doesn't fit the crime at all.

And what crime would that be?

Regards,

george

Code theft and breaching the GPL. Not that you care.

Did you read the article? It's shows evidence that no code theft was done or the kind that was wasn't game playing code or code that you shouldn't treat Vas like he's a murderer and he needs a lifetime ban.