Retrospect Match: Rebel 6 (1994) - Stockfish (2014)

Discussion of computer chess matches and engine tournaments.

Moderators: hgm, Rebel, chrisw

mwyoung
Posts: 2727
Joined: Wed May 12, 2010 10:00 pm

Retrospect Match: Rebel 6 (1994) - Stockfish (2014)

Post by mwyoung »

Retrospect Match: Rebel 6 (1994) - Stockfish (2014)

View Live @ https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wr3EowKa5Pc

Rebel 6 (1994 Chess Program)
SSDF Rating Rebel 6.0 486/50-66 MHz 2310
SSDF Rating Rebel 6.0 Pentium 90 MHz 2416

Stockfish 260314 (2014 Chess Program)
CCRL Rating (1 CPU) Stockfish DD 64-bit 3179
CEGT Rating (1 CPU) Stockfish DD x64 3071

Match Conditions:
i7 840 CPU @ 3.2 Ghz
Rebel 6 Time Control: Game in 15 minutes
Stockfish 260314 Time Control: Game in 5 minutes
Stockfish (1 CPU)
100 Game Match
"The worst thing that can happen to a forum is a running wild attacking moderator(HGM) who is not corrected by the community." - Ed Schröder
But my words like silent raindrops fell. And echoed in the wells of silence.
sainzlei
Posts: 29
Joined: Thu Oct 27, 2011 12:20 am

Re: Retrospect Match: Rebel 6 (1994) - Stockfish (2014)

Post by sainzlei »

Rebel 6 will be lost 100 times in a row .
This look like not a good idea math between both engine .

:shock:
mwyoung
Posts: 2727
Joined: Wed May 12, 2010 10:00 pm

Re: Retrospect Match: Rebel 6 (1994) - Stockfish (2014)

Post by mwyoung »

sainzlei wrote:Rebel 6 will be lost 100 times in a row .
This look like not a good idea math between both engine .

:shock:
It may lose 100 - 0 even with a x3 time advantage. The match is not about the math. Anyone can look at rating numbers. I had a request of how do engines of today play better, from the ones in the past. One fun way to show this is to let them play.

So we are going to step threw time in a series of matches with the older engine always having a x3 time advantage, and both engines playing one core for consistency.

Rebel 6 (1994)
Fritz 6 (2000)
Fruit 2 (2005-7)
Rybka 3 (2008)
Houdini 1.5a (2010-11)
"The worst thing that can happen to a forum is a running wild attacking moderator(HGM) who is not corrected by the community." - Ed Schröder
But my words like silent raindrops fell. And echoed in the wells of silence.
mwyoung
Posts: 2727
Joined: Wed May 12, 2010 10:00 pm

Re: Retrospect Match: Rebel 6 (1994) - Stockfish (2014)

Post by mwyoung »

mwyoung wrote:Retrospect Match: Rebel 6 (1994) - Stockfish (2014)

View Live @ https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wr3EowKa5Pc

Rebel 6 (1994 Chess Program)
SSDF Rating Rebel 6.0 486/50-66 MHz 2310
SSDF Rating Rebel 6.0 Pentium 90 MHz 2416

Stockfish 260314 (2014 Chess Program)
CCRL Rating (1 CPU) Stockfish DD 64-bit 3179
CEGT Rating (1 CPU) Stockfish DD x64 3071

Match Conditions:
i7 840 CPU @ 3.2 Ghz
Rebel 6 Time Control: Game in 15 minutes
Stockfish 260314 Time Control: Game in 5 minutes
Stockfish (1 CPU)
100 Game Match

Code: Select all


Stockfish 260314 64 SSE4.2   - Rebel 6.0                      100.0 - 1.0    +99/=2/-0    99.01%

"The worst thing that can happen to a forum is a running wild attacking moderator(HGM) who is not corrected by the community." - Ed Schröder
But my words like silent raindrops fell. And echoed in the wells of silence.
Vinvin
Posts: 5228
Joined: Thu Mar 09, 2006 9:40 am
Full name: Vincent Lejeune

Re: Retrospect Match: Rebel 6 (1994) - Stockfish (2014)

Post by Vinvin »

I'm just curious : how did you run Rebel 6 on a modern computer ?
mwyoung
Posts: 2727
Joined: Wed May 12, 2010 10:00 pm

Re: Retrospect Match: Rebel 6 (1994) - Stockfish (2014)

Post by mwyoung »

Vinvin wrote: Mon Aug 12, 2019 11:53 am I'm just curious : how did you run Rebel 6 on a modern computer ?
https://rebel13.nl/windows/rebel's%20with%20uci.html
Rebel UCI.jpg
"The worst thing that can happen to a forum is a running wild attacking moderator(HGM) who is not corrected by the community." - Ed Schröder
But my words like silent raindrops fell. And echoed in the wells of silence.
Uri Blass
Posts: 10267
Joined: Thu Mar 09, 2006 12:37 am
Location: Tel-Aviv Israel

Re: Retrospect Match: Rebel 6 (1994) - Stockfish (2014)

Post by Uri Blass »

I wonder if you use default contempt for stockfish because I think that it may be better to use the maximal value of contempt to help stockfish to win 100-0
mwyoung
Posts: 2727
Joined: Wed May 12, 2010 10:00 pm

Re: Retrospect Match: Rebel 6 (1994) - Stockfish (2014)

Post by mwyoung »

Uri Blass wrote: Tue Aug 13, 2019 10:48 am I wonder if you use default contempt for stockfish because I think that it may be better to use the maximal value of contempt to help stockfish to win 100-0
This was played in 2014. But if this was not noted. Then the setting would be default....
"The worst thing that can happen to a forum is a running wild attacking moderator(HGM) who is not corrected by the community." - Ed Schröder
But my words like silent raindrops fell. And echoed in the wells of silence.
Vinvin
Posts: 5228
Joined: Thu Mar 09, 2006 9:40 am
Full name: Vincent Lejeune

Re: Retrospect Match: Rebel 6 (1994) - Stockfish (2014)

Post by Vinvin »

mwyoung wrote: Tue Aug 13, 2019 2:08 pm
Uri Blass wrote: Tue Aug 13, 2019 10:48 am I wonder if you use default contempt for stockfish because I think that it may be better to use the maximal value of contempt to help stockfish to win 100-0
This was played in 2014. But if this was not noted. Then the setting would be default....
If such a match is play again these days, please use Rebel 12 because it's 100 points over Rebel 6.
Uri Blass
Posts: 10267
Joined: Thu Mar 09, 2006 12:37 am
Location: Tel-Aviv Israel

Re: Retrospect Match: Rebel 6 (1994) - Stockfish (2014)

Post by Uri Blass »

I think that the point was to play against the top programs of their time.

Rebel6 was a top program in 1994
Rebel12 was not a top program when it appeared.