Sting Sf 4.7 release

Discussion of anything and everything relating to chess playing software and machines.

Moderators: hgm, Rebel, chrisw

lech
Posts: 1136
Joined: Sun Feb 14, 2010 10:02 pm

Sting Sf 4.7 release

Post by lech »

Sorry, but I must do it now.
http://www.mediafire.com/download/d0qdz ... -sf-47.zip
Try it and enjoy! :D
Maybe, I can't be friendly, but let me be useful.
User avatar
vittyvirus
Posts: 646
Joined: Wed Jun 18, 2014 2:30 pm
Full name: Fahad Syed

Re: Sting Sf 4.7 release

Post by vittyvirus »

lech wrote:Sorry, but I must do it now.
http://www.mediafire.com/download/d0qdz ... -sf-47.zip
Try it and enjoy! :D
I was waiting! Elo now?
Karol Majewski
Posts: 106
Joined: Sat Jul 09, 2011 4:18 pm

Re: Sting Sf 4.7 release

Post by Karol Majewski »

Thanks Marek. Sting is totally awesome. In the old days, I used to think that the more elo engine has, the better analysis tool it is. Now I know it's not true anymore. Have you considered adding Syzygy support? Perhaps Sting + Syzygy = endgame monster?

BTW Sting deserves to have it's own website :)
lech
Posts: 1136
Joined: Sun Feb 14, 2010 10:02 pm

Re: Sting Sf 4.7 release

Post by lech »

Many ask how much strong is Sting 4.7 ?
Sting SF 4.7 is only in version 32-bit and is based on Stockfish 2.1.1 only.
My compilation is ~ 15% slower.

CEGT 40/4:

Code: Select all

Stockfish 2.1.1 w.32 1CPU - 2928
Sting SF 4.7 1CPU - 2906
CCRL 40/40:

Code: Select all

Stockfish 2.1.1 w.32 1CPU - 3032
Sting SF 4.7 1CPU - 3042
Sting is "one brain in one head engine". It means to play and to analyze in the same way, without some tricks.
Maybe, I can't be friendly, but let me be useful.
jpqy
Posts: 550
Joined: Thu Apr 24, 2008 9:31 am
Location: Belgium

Re: Sting Sf 4.7 release

Post by jpqy »

Hardmiddle on a i7 970 @4.0Ghz 6cores(HT Off)

Oplossen: C:\Users\jp SSD\Documents\ChessBase\Testsets\hardmiddle\hardmiddle .cbh
Maximale tijd = 10s.

1. Campora - Morovic, 1982 > 10s.
2. Panov - Taimanov, 1952 > 10s.
3. Hellers - Hansen, Malmo 1997 > 10s.
4. Asauskas - Malisauskas, Vilnius 1964 > 10s.
5. Kholmov - Bronstein, Kiew 1964 > 10s.
6. Kesoene - Rubtsova, WCh-Final 1984 > 10s.
7. Polugaevsky - Torre Gelfer, Moscow 1981 > 10s.
8. Bronstein - Olafsson, Portoroz Interzonal 1958 Opgelost in 0.08s/7; Opgelost: 1
9. Alekhine,A - Euwe,M, AVRO Holland 1938 > 10s.
10. Pos. 1, 2012 Opgelost in 6.05s/22; Opgelost: 2
11. Pos. 2, 1996 > 10s.
12. Pos. 3, 1996 Opgelost in 4.60s/18; Opgelost: 3
13. Karpov - Gelfand, Linares 1993 > 10s.
14. Tyomkin - McDonald, Oakham GM 2001 > 10s.
15. Akesson - Stefansson, Nordic-ch 1997 > 10s.
16. Yusupov - Dolmatov, Wijkaan Zee 1991-mch. Cand. 1991 > 10s.
17. PengXiaomin - Motylev, CHN-RUS 2001 Opgelost in 0.09s/7; Opgelost: 4
18. Romanishin - Smagin, Julian Borowski 2001 Opgelost in 0.55s/24; Opgelost: 5
19. Ionov - Sergienko, RUS-chT 1999 > 10s.
20. Movsesian - Sokolov, EU-chT 1999 > 10s.
21. Mortensen - Van der Weide, Reykjavik 1998 Opgelost in 0.37s/13; Opgelost: 6
22. Zakharevich - Guliev, Chigorin memorial 1997 Opgelost in 5.10s/20; Opgelost: 7
23. Minasian - Jonkman, Anibal op 2000 > 10s.
24. Svetushkin - Kruppa, Kiev 2000 > 10s.
25. Dolinskij - Tosic, Geller memorial 1999 > 10s.
26. Botvinnik - Capablanca, Avro 2012 Opgelost in 3.31s/22; Opgelost: 8
27. Ivanchuk,V - Jussupow,A, Candidates qf3 g/60 rapid 1991 > 10s.
28. Borkowsky - Nunn, European Juniores 1974 > 10s.
29. Tal,M - Larsen,B, Candidates sf1 1965 > 10s.
30. Pos. 4, 2010 > 10s.

Sting SF 4.7
Resultaat: 8 op 30 = 26.6%. Gemiddelde tijd = 2.51s / 16.62
lech
Posts: 1136
Joined: Sun Feb 14, 2010 10:02 pm

Re: Sting Sf 4.7 release

Post by lech »

lech wrote:Many ask: how much stronger is Sting 4.7 ?
Sting SF 4.7 is only in version 32-bit and is based on Stockfish 2.1.1 only.
My compilation is ~ 15% slower.

CEGT 40/4:

Code: Select all

Stockfish 2.1.1 w.32 1CPU - 2928
Sting SF 4.7 1CPU - 2906
CCRL 40/40:

Code: Select all

Stockfish 2.1.1 w.32 1CPU - 3032
Sting SF 4.7 1CPU - 3042
Sting is "one brain in one head engine". It means to play and to analyze in the same way, without some tricks.
One more explanation. The main goal of Sting is not the ELO racing, but I try to get an expected behavior of chess engines without a serious ELO cost.
BTW. I am far to use tablebases. For me it is a dirty tool.
Maybe, I can't be friendly, but let me be useful.
Vinvin
Posts: 5228
Joined: Thu Mar 09, 2006 9:40 am
Full name: Vincent Lejeune

Re: Sting Sf 4.7 release

Post by Vinvin »

jpqy wrote:Hardmiddle on a i7 970 @4.0Ghz 6cores(HT Off)

Oplossen: C:\Users\jp SSD\Documents\ChessBase\Testsets\hardmiddle\hardmiddle .cbh
Maximale tijd = 10s.
...
Sting SF 4.7
Resultaat: 8 op 30 = 26.6%. Gemiddelde tijd = 2.51s / 16.62
Is it good compared to other engines ?
lech
Posts: 1136
Joined: Sun Feb 14, 2010 10:02 pm

Re: Sting Sf 4.7 release

Post by lech »

Vinvin wrote:
jpqy wrote:Hardmiddle on a i7 970 @4.0Ghz 6cores(HT Off)

Oplossen: C:\Users\jp SSD\Documents\ChessBase\Testsets\hardmiddle\hardmiddle .cbh
Maximale tijd = 10s.
...
Sting SF 4.7
Resultaat: 8 op 30 = 26.6%. Gemiddelde tijd = 2.51s / 16.62
Is it good compared to other engines ?
It means nothing for my idea (Sting).
I like solders of Stockfish. :lol: :lol: :lol:
Maybe, I can't be friendly, but let me be useful.