To Larry Kaufman

Discussion of anything and everything relating to chess playing software and machines.

Moderators: bob, hgm, Harvey Williamson

Forum rules
This textbox is used to restore diagrams posted with the [d] tag before the upgrade.
User avatar
Nordlandia
Posts: 2482
Joined: Fri Sep 25, 2015 7:38 pm
Location: Sortland, Norway

Re: To Larry Kaufman

Post by Nordlandia » Sat Mar 12, 2016 10:03 pm

Here's is a similar challange:

NDE 1986 (2nd Prize, Israel Ring 1986)

[d]5k2/1n6/1p3K2/P7/1P2N3/p1P2B2/8/2b5 w - - 0 0

1 a6 a2 2 axb7 Bf4 3 Ng5! Bb8! (a1Q 4 Ne6+ Kg8! 5 Nxf4 Qxc3+ 6 Kf5 and Black can't win; 3 . . . Bd6 4 Ne6+ Kg8 5 Nc7! Bxc7 6 Bc4+ draws. So the Bishop crosses the critical square c7, which however White can exploit too:) 4 Nh7+! Ke8 5 Bc6+ Kd8 6 Ng5 Kc7 7 b5! a1Q (Kd6!? 8 Ne4+ Kc7 9 Ng5 repeating) 8 Nf7! positional draw.

[d]1b6/1Pk2N2/1pB2K2/1P6/8/2P5/8/q7 b - - 0 7

Jesse Gersenson
Posts: 575
Joined: Sat Aug 20, 2011 7:43 am
Contact:

Re: To Larry Kaufman

Post by Jesse Gersenson » Sat Mar 12, 2016 10:19 pm

Larry, is this new term applied during analysis mode?

TShackel
Posts: 313
Joined: Fri Apr 04, 2014 10:09 pm
Location: Neenah, WI, United States

Re: To Larry Kaufman

Post by TShackel » Sat Mar 12, 2016 11:51 pm

lkaufman wrote:The new term cannot be set differently for middlegame or endgame, but I think there is no need. If a move allows the opponent more checks or attacks on our king, a higher setting will avoid the move. In other words, it's symmetric; it treats both sides the same.
We could be off a few percent in the optimum setting, and it may also be that the optimum setting is quite different for long time control games than for the levels at which we can test. I suppose if you set it for something like 110% of our recommendation the elo loss will be pretty small, probably single digit, so if that makes Komodo aggressive enough for you you can use that all the time (except for official tests of course). But a really high setting like 150% would cost a lot of elo. Pawns do have value!
Thanks for the tips as to how high the value could go with only a loss of a few elo. That might be advantageous for some type of contempt concept as well, that against weaker engines maybe use a higher value.

But nevertheless, it is clear to me you are listening to your subscribers for new UCI parameters while always focusing on elo gain. And you are very innovative with novel, new programming ideas. Congrats.

Sincerely,

Tim.

mjlef
Posts: 1429
Joined: Thu Mar 30, 2006 12:08 pm
Contact:

Re: To Larry Kaufman

Post by mjlef » Sun Mar 13, 2016 2:55 am

I ran the position with a few values for the new parameter, and yes, with a high enough value it finds the move very quickly.

lkaufman
Posts: 3772
Joined: Sun Jan 10, 2010 5:15 am
Location: Maryland USA
Contact:

Re: To Larry Kaufman

Post by lkaufman » Sun Mar 13, 2016 4:45 am

Jesse Gersenson wrote:Larry, is this new term applied during analysis mode?
I don't know any reason it wouldn't be valid for analysis mode, though I'll have to test the final version to confirm that this is actually so.
Komodo rules!

lkaufman
Posts: 3772
Joined: Sun Jan 10, 2010 5:15 am
Location: Maryland USA
Contact:

Re: To Larry Kaufman

Post by lkaufman » Sun Mar 13, 2016 4:48 am

Nordlandia wrote:Someone suggested adjustable 50-move rule for certain positions that is usually a draw, e.g Behting Study.

For example 25-move rule may be adequate in that particular position.

Is this possible to add in Komodo parameters?

https://chessprogramming.wikispaces.com/Behting+Study
We could add it, but the problem is that some GUIs have a limit on the number of UCI options, and we are near that limit now I think for some GUIs. I think it is not the most useful option we could add.
Komodo rules!

User avatar
Nordlandia
Posts: 2482
Joined: Fri Sep 25, 2015 7:38 pm
Location: Sortland, Norway

Re: To Larry Kaufman

Post by Nordlandia » Sun Mar 13, 2016 2:40 pm

lkaufman wrote:
Nordlandia wrote:Someone suggested adjustable 50-move rule for certain positions that is usually a draw, e.g Behting Study.

For example 25-move rule may be adequate in that particular position.

Is this possible to add in Komodo parameters?

https://chessprogramming.wikispaces.com/Behting+Study
We could add it, but the problem is that some GUIs have a limit on the number of UCI options, and we are near that limit now I think for some GUIs. I think it is not the most useful option we could add.
The difference will be clear 0.00 evaluation against +3.00 or even 4 in such scenarios. Maybe not the most useful parameter but fine for certain studies as mentioned above.

carldaman
Posts: 1740
Joined: Sat Jun 02, 2012 12:13 am

Re: To Larry Kaufman

Post by carldaman » Mon Mar 14, 2016 12:41 am

lkaufman wrote:
Nordlandia wrote:Someone suggested adjustable 50-move rule for certain positions that is usually a draw, e.g Behting Study.

For example 25-move rule may be adequate in that particular position.

Is this possible to add in Komodo parameters?

https://chessprogramming.wikispaces.com/Behting+Study
We could add it, but the problem is that some GUIs have a limit on the number of UCI options, and we are near that limit now I think for some GUIs. I think it is not the most useful option we could add.
Hi Larry,

Thanks for always trying to make Komodo a better analysis partner. I was wondering about the UCI option limit - what exactly is the limit? I remember seeing a lot of parameters in other UCI engines (Fruit comes to mind), and I did not think Komodo came anywhere close to having that many parameters. Or, are options and parameters a 'different animal' altogether?

Thanks,
CL

lkaufman
Posts: 3772
Joined: Sun Jan 10, 2010 5:15 am
Location: Maryland USA
Contact:

Re: To Larry Kaufman

Post by lkaufman » Mon Mar 14, 2016 2:13 am

carldaman wrote:
lkaufman wrote:
Nordlandia wrote:Someone suggested adjustable 50-move rule for certain positions that is usually a draw, e.g Behting Study.

For example 25-move rule may be adequate in that particular position.

Is this possible to add in Komodo parameters?

https://chessprogramming.wikispaces.com/Behting+Study
We could add it, but the problem is that some GUIs have a limit on the number of UCI options, and we are near that limit now I think for some GUIs. I think it is not the most useful option we could add.
Hi Larry,

Thanks for always trying to make Komodo a better analysis partner. I was wondering about the UCI option limit - what exactly is the limit? I remember seeing a lot of parameters in other UCI engines (Fruit comes to mind), and I did not think Komodo came anywhere close to having that many parameters. Or, are options and parameters a 'different animal' altogether?

Thanks,
CL
The limit is set by the GUI, so each is different. We have no way to know what the minimum value is for all known GUIs, so we just limit it to below any GUIs we actually test. We could probably add one or two more safely, but it's not worth taking the risk for an option that would be rarely used.
Komodo rules!

Jesse Gersenson
Posts: 575
Joined: Sat Aug 20, 2011 7:43 am
Contact:

Re: To Larry Kaufman

Post by Jesse Gersenson » Mon Mar 14, 2016 6:49 am

lkaufman wrote:The limit is set by the GUI, so each is different. We have no way to know what the minimum value is for all known GUIs, so we just limit it to below any GUIs we actually test. We could probably add one or two more safely, but it's not worth taking the risk for an option that would be rarely used.
Why not off-load parameters into a configuration file?

Post Reply