Rare beautiful games of the top engines

Discussion of anything and everything relating to chess playing software and machines.

Moderators: hgm, Rebel, chrisw

MikeGL
Posts: 1010
Joined: Thu Sep 01, 2011 2:49 pm

Re: Deep Shredder 13 vs. Chiron 4

Post by MikeGL »

Lyudmil Tsvetkov wrote:
MikeGL wrote:
BrendanJNorman wrote:
Lyudmil Tsvetkov wrote: opening favoured too much black, also why did not SF play 11.0-0 instead of the obviously losing 11.ed5?

my personal opinion is that, while engines have indeed produced gems from time to time, this is not one of them. I really found nothing special in black's treatment of the game.
For once I think I'll have to agree with Lyudmil here.

This game just looks like a standard game between two super engines.

At this level, a lot of the really brilliant ideas get pruned away when the super engine sees a razor edge defense and assumes the opponent will too.

To see really brilliant computer chess, I usually goto my own engine personalities I've created like...

Rodent Topalov!

Look at the following games, against engines which are 2700+ on CCRL, so not weak, but lose brilliantly against a very realistic Topalov style.

For me at least, that's computer chess! :)
Those games of Rodent you've posted are truly beautiful too.
The below game is won by SF8 as black against Houdini 5 this time. SF8 has material deficit but with piece mobility/activity.

Having a material deficit and still winning against a Top 5 engine in a long time control is not common. That's why I consider these games beautiful. Rare to find these types of games, because most of the time a single pawn deficit can already mean a lost game at this 3200+ level.
thanks Mike, for posting this.

I liked this game better.

still, quite probably, at the end of the book:

[d]r1bqk1nr/p4pbp/2pp2p1/2p1p3/2P5/1PNP2P1/PB2PP1P/R2QK1NR w KQkq - 0 9

white is already lost.

that is why I hate any book longer than 1 and a half moves.
Did you see that quiet 36...Ra7! move of black? It forces and completes the fencing/trapping of the Na4. after 36...Ra7! the N of white has nowhere to go and will be recaptured within a few more moves. Haven't seen that kind of depth and accuracy in any GM games.

Anyway, here's how Deep Shredder shows of its gambit skills against Chiron 4, the Italy's number 1 engine rated 3100+ in an Alekhines Defence. This is a Brilliant game by DS13 too.

[pgn]
[Event "?"]
[Site "?"]
[Round "1"]
[White "Deep Shredder 13"]
[Black "Chiron 4"]
[Result "1-0"]
[Variation "Balogh Variation"]
[TimeControl "3600+15"]
[Termination "normal"]
[PlyCount "103"]
[WhiteType "human"]
[BlackType "human"]

1. e4 {book} Nf6 {book} 2. e5 {book} Nd5 {book} 3. d4 {book} d6 {book} 4.
Bc4 {book} c6 {book} 5. Qe2 {book} dxe5 {book} 6. dxe5 {book} Bf5 {book} 7.
Nf3 {book} e6 {book} 8. O-O {book} Nd7 {book} 9. a3 {+0.09/27 111s} Bg4
{-0.23/25 197s} 10. Re1 {+0.01/31 123s} Qc7 {+0.08/25 94s} 11. Nbd2
{0.00/32 85s} Be7 {+0.10/25 92s} 12. Ba2 {-0.01/32 159s} Rd8 {+0.21/25 90s}
13. h3 {0.00/30 80s} Bh5 {+0.09/25 88s} 14. Bb1 {0.00/33 68s} a5 {+0.18/26
155s} 15. c4 {-0.02/29 97s} Nf4 {+0.17/27 83s} 16. Qe3 {0.00/30 63s} g5
{+0.17/24 82s} 17. b4 {0.00/30 60s} axb4 {-0.12/23 144s} 18. axb4 {+0.03/30
79s} Bxb4 {-0.13/24 81s} 19. Ba3 {0.00/30 64s} Bxf3 {-0.05/24 209s} 20.
Bxb4 {+0.70/31 89s} Bxg2 {-0.68/28 71s} 21. Bd6 {+0.77/33 89s} Qb6
{-0.72/28 109s} 22. Bc2 {+0.78/32 60s} Bxh3 {-0.57/27 67s} 23. Qxb6
{+0.76/33 108s} Nxb6 {-0.73/27 67s} 24. Ne4 {+0.99/33 166s} Nd7 {-0.83/29
65s} 25. Reb1 {+1.80/31 99s} Ne2+ {-0.65/25 66s} 26. Kh2 {+3.50/28 91s} Bf5
{-0.88/29 62s} 27. Rxb7 {+4.79/31 150s} Nd4 {-1.20/29 62s} 28. Nf6+
{+21.21/32 116s} Nxf6 {0.00/10 0s} 29. exf6 {+30.33/31 76s} Nf3+ {-11.60/29
64s} 30. Kh1 {+M65/38 86s} Ne5 {-21.92/29 70s} (30. .. Bxc2) 31. Bxf5
{+30.35/38 133s} exf5 {-31.10/31 150s} 32. Re7+ {+M47/35 53s} Kf8
{-31.10/10 0.015s} 33. Rea7+ {+M41/37 90s} Kg8 {-M38/33 156s} 34. Ra8
{+M39/37 65s} h6 {-M36/31 52s} 35. Rxd8+ {+M37/35 55s} Kh7 {-M34/10 0s} 36.
Rxh8+ {+M35/35 93s} Kxh8 {-M32/30 51s} 37. Bxe5 {+M31/33 49s} f4 {-M30/29
78s} 38. Ra7 {+M29/29 15s} Kg8 {-M30/27 49s} 39. c5 {+M27/27 6.7s} g4
{-M26/29 48s} 40. Rc7 {+M25/25 1.8s} h5 {-M24/29 47s} 41. Bxf4 {+M23/23
0.98s} Kh7 {-M22/28 46s} 42. Rxc6 {+M21/21 0.28s} Kg6 {-M20/28 46s} 43. Ra6
{+M19/19 0.16s} h4 {-M18/28 105s} 44. c6 {+M17/17 0.25s} g3 {-M16/32 43s}
45. fxg3 {+M15/15 0.016s} Kf5 {-M14/37 43s} 46. c7 {+M13/13 0s} hxg3
{-M12/57 41s} 47. Kg2 {+M11/11 0.015s} Kxf4 {-M10/128 13s} 48. c8=Q {+M9/9
0s} Kg5 {-M8/128 11s} 49. Kxg3 {+M7/7 0s} Kh5 {-M6/128 0.86s} 50. Qg4+
{+M5/5 0s} Kh6 {-M4/10 0s} 51. Qg7+ {+M3/3 0s} Kh5 {-M2/10 0s} 52. Ra5#
{+M1/1 0s, White mates} 1-0
[/pgn]

Throwing 3 pawns for free in exchange for an attack on the uncastled king of black. Materially black is ahead, but DS13 proved that his position and initiative compensated for his lost material. Very nice attack.
Top
BrendanJNorman
Posts: 2526
Joined: Mon Feb 08, 2016 12:43 am
Full name: Brendan J Norman

Re: Deep Shredder 13 vs. Chiron 4

Post by BrendanJNorman »

MikeGL wrote:
Lyudmil Tsvetkov wrote:
MikeGL wrote:
BrendanJNorman wrote:
Lyudmil Tsvetkov wrote: opening favoured too much black, also why did not SF play 11.0-0 instead of the obviously losing 11.ed5?

my personal opinion is that, while engines have indeed produced gems from time to time, this is not one of them. I really found nothing special in black's treatment of the game.
For once I think I'll have to agree with Lyudmil here.

This game just looks like a standard game between two super engines.

At this level, a lot of the really brilliant ideas get pruned away when the super engine sees a razor edge defense and assumes the opponent will too.

To see really brilliant computer chess, I usually goto my own engine personalities I've created like...

Rodent Topalov!

Look at the following games, against engines which are 2700+ on CCRL, so not weak, but lose brilliantly against a very realistic Topalov style.

For me at least, that's computer chess! :)
Those games of Rodent you've posted are truly beautiful too.
The below game is won by SF8 as black against Houdini 5 this time. SF8 has material deficit but with piece mobility/activity.

Having a material deficit and still winning against a Top 5 engine in a long time control is not common. That's why I consider these games beautiful. Rare to find these types of games, because most of the time a single pawn deficit can already mean a lost game at this 3200+ level.
thanks Mike, for posting this.

I liked this game better.

still, quite probably, at the end of the book:

[d]r1bqk1nr/p4pbp/2pp2p1/2p1p3/2P5/1PNP2P1/PB2PP1P/R2QK1NR w KQkq - 0 9

white is already lost.

that is why I hate any book longer than 1 and a half moves.
Did you see that quiet 36...Ra7! move of black? It forces and completes the fencing/trapping of the Na4. after 36...Ra7! the N of white has nowhere to go and will be recaptured within a few more moves. Haven't seen that kind of depth and accuracy in any GM games.

Anyway, here's how Deep Shredder shows of its gambit skills against Chiron 4, the Italy's number 1 engine rated 3100+ in an Alekhines Defence. This is a Brilliant game by DS13 too.

[pgn]
[Event "?"]
[Site "?"]
[Round "1"]
[White "Deep Shredder 13"]
[Black "Chiron 4"]
[Result "1-0"]
[Variation "Balogh Variation"]
[TimeControl "3600+15"]
[Termination "normal"]
[PlyCount "103"]
[WhiteType "human"]
[BlackType "human"]

1. e4 {book} Nf6 {book} 2. e5 {book} Nd5 {book} 3. d4 {book} d6 {book} 4.
Bc4 {book} c6 {book} 5. Qe2 {book} dxe5 {book} 6. dxe5 {book} Bf5 {book} 7.
Nf3 {book} e6 {book} 8. O-O {book} Nd7 {book} 9. a3 {+0.09/27 111s} Bg4
{-0.23/25 197s} 10. Re1 {+0.01/31 123s} Qc7 {+0.08/25 94s} 11. Nbd2
{0.00/32 85s} Be7 {+0.10/25 92s} 12. Ba2 {-0.01/32 159s} Rd8 {+0.21/25 90s}
13. h3 {0.00/30 80s} Bh5 {+0.09/25 88s} 14. Bb1 {0.00/33 68s} a5 {+0.18/26
155s} 15. c4 {-0.02/29 97s} Nf4 {+0.17/27 83s} 16. Qe3 {0.00/30 63s} g5
{+0.17/24 82s} 17. b4 {0.00/30 60s} axb4 {-0.12/23 144s} 18. axb4 {+0.03/30
79s} Bxb4 {-0.13/24 81s} 19. Ba3 {0.00/30 64s} Bxf3 {-0.05/24 209s} 20.
Bxb4 {+0.70/31 89s} Bxg2 {-0.68/28 71s} 21. Bd6 {+0.77/33 89s} Qb6
{-0.72/28 109s} 22. Bc2 {+0.78/32 60s} Bxh3 {-0.57/27 67s} 23. Qxb6
{+0.76/33 108s} Nxb6 {-0.73/27 67s} 24. Ne4 {+0.99/33 166s} Nd7 {-0.83/29
65s} 25. Reb1 {+1.80/31 99s} Ne2+ {-0.65/25 66s} 26. Kh2 {+3.50/28 91s} Bf5
{-0.88/29 62s} 27. Rxb7 {+4.79/31 150s} Nd4 {-1.20/29 62s} 28. Nf6+
{+21.21/32 116s} Nxf6 {0.00/10 0s} 29. exf6 {+30.33/31 76s} Nf3+ {-11.60/29
64s} 30. Kh1 {+M65/38 86s} Ne5 {-21.92/29 70s} (30. .. Bxc2) 31. Bxf5
{+30.35/38 133s} exf5 {-31.10/31 150s} 32. Re7+ {+M47/35 53s} Kf8
{-31.10/10 0.015s} 33. Rea7+ {+M41/37 90s} Kg8 {-M38/33 156s} 34. Ra8
{+M39/37 65s} h6 {-M36/31 52s} 35. Rxd8+ {+M37/35 55s} Kh7 {-M34/10 0s} 36.
Rxh8+ {+M35/35 93s} Kxh8 {-M32/30 51s} 37. Bxe5 {+M31/33 49s} f4 {-M30/29
78s} 38. Ra7 {+M29/29 15s} Kg8 {-M30/27 49s} 39. c5 {+M27/27 6.7s} g4
{-M26/29 48s} 40. Rc7 {+M25/25 1.8s} h5 {-M24/29 47s} 41. Bxf4 {+M23/23
0.98s} Kh7 {-M22/28 46s} 42. Rxc6 {+M21/21 0.28s} Kg6 {-M20/28 46s} 43. Ra6
{+M19/19 0.16s} h4 {-M18/28 105s} 44. c6 {+M17/17 0.25s} g3 {-M16/32 43s}
45. fxg3 {+M15/15 0.016s} Kf5 {-M14/37 43s} 46. c7 {+M13/13 0s} hxg3
{-M12/57 41s} 47. Kg2 {+M11/11 0.015s} Kxf4 {-M10/128 13s} 48. c8=Q {+M9/9
0s} Kg5 {-M8/128 11s} 49. Kxg3 {+M7/7 0s} Kh5 {-M6/128 0.86s} 50. Qg4+
{+M5/5 0s} Kh6 {-M4/10 0s} 51. Qg7+ {+M3/3 0s} Kh5 {-M2/10 0s} 52. Ra5#
{+M1/1 0s, White mates} 1-0
[/pgn]
Here it comes..... :lol:

Typically negative TC comment: "Nice game, but nothing special. Shredder would never have played that game if Chiron had a REAL opening book. Black is already lost after 1...Nf6, so the game result is obvious."

My comment: Yeah, I've liked this new dynamic element in Shredder's play and although it's not a real contender anymore, it still has a unique and strong "opinion" in positions.

Chiron's 16...g5 is interesting too, and the type of move you'd expect from a human player (instead of the more sober 16...Bxf3 17.Nxf3 Ng6 where white's space advantage is still imposing.

16...g5 looks active, but severely weakens the f6 square (the only real drawback) and this was exploited beautifully by Shredder. Nice game.
Top
User avatar
MikeB
Posts: 4889
Joined: Thu Mar 09, 2006 6:34 am
Location: Pen Argyl, Pennsylvania

Re: Deep Shredder 13 vs. Chiron 4

Post by MikeB »

MikeGL wrote: ...

Did you see that quiet 36...Ra7! move of black? It forces and completes the fencing/trapping of the Na4. after 36...Ra7! the N of white has nowhere to go and will be recaptured within a few more moves. Haven't seen that kind of depth and accuracy in any GM games.

Anyway, here's how Deep Shredder shows of its gambit skills against Chiron 4, the Italy's number 1 engine rated 3100+ in an Alekhines Defence. This is a Brilliant game by DS13 too.

[pgn]
[Event "?"]
[Site "?"]
[Round "1"]
[White "Deep Shredder 13"]
[Black "Chiron 4"]
[Result "1-0"]
[Variation "Balogh Variation"]
[TimeControl "3600+15"]
[Termination "normal"]
[PlyCount "103"]
[WhiteType "human"]
[BlackType "human"]

1. e4 {book} Nf6 {book} 2. e5 {book} Nd5 {book} 3. d4 {book} d6 {book} 4.
Bc4 {book} c6 {book} 5. Qe2 {book} dxe5 {book} 6. dxe5 {book} Bf5 {book} 7.
Nf3 {book} e6 {book} 8. O-O {book} Nd7 {book} 9. a3 {+0.09/27 111s} Bg4
{-0.23/25 197s} 10. Re1 {+0.01/31 123s} Qc7 {+0.08/25 94s} 11. Nbd2
{0.00/32 85s} Be7 {+0.10/25 92s} 12. Ba2 {-0.01/32 159s} Rd8 {+0.21/25 90s}
13. h3 {0.00/30 80s} Bh5 {+0.09/25 88s} 14. Bb1 {0.00/33 68s} a5 {+0.18/26
155s} 15. c4 {-0.02/29 97s} Nf4 {+0.17/27 83s} 16. Qe3 {0.00/30 63s} g5
{+0.17/24 82s} 17. b4 {0.00/30 60s} axb4 {-0.12/23 144s} 18. axb4 {+0.03/30
79s} Bxb4 {-0.13/24 81s} 19. Ba3 {0.00/30 64s} Bxf3 {-0.05/24 209s} 20.
Bxb4 {+0.70/31 89s} Bxg2 {-0.68/28 71s} 21. Bd6 {+0.77/33 89s} Qb6
{-0.72/28 109s} 22. Bc2 {+0.78/32 60s} Bxh3 {-0.57/27 67s} 23. Qxb6
{+0.76/33 108s} Nxb6 {-0.73/27 67s} 24. Ne4 {+0.99/33 166s} Nd7 {-0.83/29
65s} 25. Reb1 {+1.80/31 99s} Ne2+ {-0.65/25 66s} 26. Kh2 {+3.50/28 91s} Bf5
{-0.88/29 62s} 27. Rxb7 {+4.79/31 150s} Nd4 {-1.20/29 62s} 28. Nf6+
{+21.21/32 116s} Nxf6 {0.00/10 0s} 29. exf6 {+30.33/31 76s} Nf3+ {-11.60/29
64s} 30. Kh1 {+M65/38 86s} Ne5 {-21.92/29 70s} (30. .. Bxc2) 31. Bxf5
{+30.35/38 133s} exf5 {-31.10/31 150s} 32. Re7+ {+M47/35 53s} Kf8
{-31.10/10 0.015s} 33. Rea7+ {+M41/37 90s} Kg8 {-M38/33 156s} 34. Ra8
{+M39/37 65s} h6 {-M36/31 52s} 35. Rxd8+ {+M37/35 55s} Kh7 {-M34/10 0s} 36.
Rxh8+ {+M35/35 93s} Kxh8 {-M32/30 51s} 37. Bxe5 {+M31/33 49s} f4 {-M30/29
78s} 38. Ra7 {+M29/29 15s} Kg8 {-M30/27 49s} 39. c5 {+M27/27 6.7s} g4
{-M26/29 48s} 40. Rc7 {+M25/25 1.8s} h5 {-M24/29 47s} 41. Bxf4 {+M23/23
0.98s} Kh7 {-M22/28 46s} 42. Rxc6 {+M21/21 0.28s} Kg6 {-M20/28 46s} 43. Ra6
{+M19/19 0.16s} h4 {-M18/28 105s} 44. c6 {+M17/17 0.25s} g3 {-M16/32 43s}
45. fxg3 {+M15/15 0.016s} Kf5 {-M14/37 43s} 46. c7 {+M13/13 0s} hxg3
{-M12/57 41s} 47. Kg2 {+M11/11 0.015s} Kxf4 {-M10/128 13s} 48. c8=Q {+M9/9
0s} Kg5 {-M8/128 11s} 49. Kxg3 {+M7/7 0s} Kh5 {-M6/128 0.86s} 50. Qg4+
{+M5/5 0s} Kh6 {-M4/10 0s} 51. Qg7+ {+M3/3 0s} Kh5 {-M2/10 0s} 52. Ra5#
{+M1/1 0s, White mates} 1-0
[/pgn]

Throwing 3 pawns for free in exchange for an attack on the uncastled king of black. Materially black is ahead, but DS13 proved that his position and initiative compensated for his lost material. Very nice attack.
very nice game - a quiet move not played was 22.Kh2! delaying the exchange...

[d]3rk2r/1p1n1p1p/1qpBp3/4P1p1/2P2n2/4Q2P/3N1Pb1/RB2R1K1 w k - 2 22

Code: Select all

30	+2.04 	1.24G	1:59.41	Kh2 Rg8 Rg1 f5 exf6 Qxe3 fxe3 Nxf6 c5 g4 exf4 gxh3 Be4 Ng4+ Kg3 Bxe4 Nxe4 h2 Rh1 Nf6+ Kf3 Nxe4 Kxe4 Rg2 Ra3 b6 Kf3 Rd2 Bc7 R2d3+ Rxd3 Rxd3+ Ke4 Rh3 cxb6 Kd7 f5 exf5+ Kd4 Kc8 Rxh2 Rxh2 Bxh2 Kb7 Kc5 h5 Bg3 h4 Bxh4
Top
BrendanJNorman
Posts: 2526
Joined: Mon Feb 08, 2016 12:43 am
Full name: Brendan J Norman

Re: Deep Shredder 13 vs. Chiron 4

Post by BrendanJNorman »

MikeB wrote:
MikeGL wrote: ...

Did you see that quiet 36...Ra7! move of black? It forces and completes the fencing/trapping of the Na4. after 36...Ra7! the N of white has nowhere to go and will be recaptured within a few more moves. Haven't seen that kind of depth and accuracy in any GM games.

Anyway, here's how Deep Shredder shows of its gambit skills against Chiron 4, the Italy's number 1 engine rated 3100+ in an Alekhines Defence. This is a Brilliant game by DS13 too.

[pgn]
[Event "?"]
[Site "?"]
[Round "1"]
[White "Deep Shredder 13"]
[Black "Chiron 4"]
[Result "1-0"]
[Variation "Balogh Variation"]
[TimeControl "3600+15"]
[Termination "normal"]
[PlyCount "103"]
[WhiteType "human"]
[BlackType "human"]

1. e4 {book} Nf6 {book} 2. e5 {book} Nd5 {book} 3. d4 {book} d6 {book} 4.
Bc4 {book} c6 {book} 5. Qe2 {book} dxe5 {book} 6. dxe5 {book} Bf5 {book} 7.
Nf3 {book} e6 {book} 8. O-O {book} Nd7 {book} 9. a3 {+0.09/27 111s} Bg4
{-0.23/25 197s} 10. Re1 {+0.01/31 123s} Qc7 {+0.08/25 94s} 11. Nbd2
{0.00/32 85s} Be7 {+0.10/25 92s} 12. Ba2 {-0.01/32 159s} Rd8 {+0.21/25 90s}
13. h3 {0.00/30 80s} Bh5 {+0.09/25 88s} 14. Bb1 {0.00/33 68s} a5 {+0.18/26
155s} 15. c4 {-0.02/29 97s} Nf4 {+0.17/27 83s} 16. Qe3 {0.00/30 63s} g5
{+0.17/24 82s} 17. b4 {0.00/30 60s} axb4 {-0.12/23 144s} 18. axb4 {+0.03/30
79s} Bxb4 {-0.13/24 81s} 19. Ba3 {0.00/30 64s} Bxf3 {-0.05/24 209s} 20.
Bxb4 {+0.70/31 89s} Bxg2 {-0.68/28 71s} 21. Bd6 {+0.77/33 89s} Qb6
{-0.72/28 109s} 22. Bc2 {+0.78/32 60s} Bxh3 {-0.57/27 67s} 23. Qxb6
{+0.76/33 108s} Nxb6 {-0.73/27 67s} 24. Ne4 {+0.99/33 166s} Nd7 {-0.83/29
65s} 25. Reb1 {+1.80/31 99s} Ne2+ {-0.65/25 66s} 26. Kh2 {+3.50/28 91s} Bf5
{-0.88/29 62s} 27. Rxb7 {+4.79/31 150s} Nd4 {-1.20/29 62s} 28. Nf6+
{+21.21/32 116s} Nxf6 {0.00/10 0s} 29. exf6 {+30.33/31 76s} Nf3+ {-11.60/29
64s} 30. Kh1 {+M65/38 86s} Ne5 {-21.92/29 70s} (30. .. Bxc2) 31. Bxf5
{+30.35/38 133s} exf5 {-31.10/31 150s} 32. Re7+ {+M47/35 53s} Kf8
{-31.10/10 0.015s} 33. Rea7+ {+M41/37 90s} Kg8 {-M38/33 156s} 34. Ra8
{+M39/37 65s} h6 {-M36/31 52s} 35. Rxd8+ {+M37/35 55s} Kh7 {-M34/10 0s} 36.
Rxh8+ {+M35/35 93s} Kxh8 {-M32/30 51s} 37. Bxe5 {+M31/33 49s} f4 {-M30/29
78s} 38. Ra7 {+M29/29 15s} Kg8 {-M30/27 49s} 39. c5 {+M27/27 6.7s} g4
{-M26/29 48s} 40. Rc7 {+M25/25 1.8s} h5 {-M24/29 47s} 41. Bxf4 {+M23/23
0.98s} Kh7 {-M22/28 46s} 42. Rxc6 {+M21/21 0.28s} Kg6 {-M20/28 46s} 43. Ra6
{+M19/19 0.16s} h4 {-M18/28 105s} 44. c6 {+M17/17 0.25s} g3 {-M16/32 43s}
45. fxg3 {+M15/15 0.016s} Kf5 {-M14/37 43s} 46. c7 {+M13/13 0s} hxg3
{-M12/57 41s} 47. Kg2 {+M11/11 0.015s} Kxf4 {-M10/128 13s} 48. c8=Q {+M9/9
0s} Kg5 {-M8/128 11s} 49. Kxg3 {+M7/7 0s} Kh5 {-M6/128 0.86s} 50. Qg4+
{+M5/5 0s} Kh6 {-M4/10 0s} 51. Qg7+ {+M3/3 0s} Kh5 {-M2/10 0s} 52. Ra5#
{+M1/1 0s, White mates} 1-0
[/pgn]

Throwing 3 pawns for free in exchange for an attack on the uncastled king of black. Materially black is ahead, but DS13 proved that his position and initiative compensated for his lost material. Very nice attack.
very nice game - a quiet move not played was 22.Kh2! delaying the exchange...

[d]3rk2r/1p1n1p1p/1qpBp3/4P1p1/2P2n2/4Q2P/3N1Pb1/RB2R1K1 w k - 2 22

Code: Select all

30	+2.04 	1.24G	1:59.41	Kh2 Rg8 Rg1 f5 exf6 Qxe3 fxe3 Nxf6 c5 g4 exf4 gxh3 Be4 Ng4+ Kg3 Bxe4 Nxe4 h2 Rh1 Nf6+ Kf3 Nxe4 Kxe4 Rg2 Ra3 b6 Kf3 Rd2 Bc7 R2d3+ Rxd3 Rxd3+ Ke4 Rh3 cxb6 Kd7 f5 exf5+ Kd4 Kc8 Rxh2 Rxh2 Bxh2 Kb7 Kc5 h5 Bg3 h4 Bxh4
The idea of 22.Kh2 isn't to delay the exchange, but to:

1. Play Rg1 attacking the bishop which is short of squares, and force ...Bxh3, which kicks the bishop off the h1-a8 diagonal, thus allowing Ne4 without fear of exchange with ....Bxe4 (a knight on e4 is much superior to a bishop there).

2. Play Ne4 and continue attacking the kingside.

Just a note: black cannot play ...Qxe3 because fxe3 wins a piece, so Kh2 also uses this point to buy time for the Rg1 idea.

Generally speaking, the attacking side should not trade queens and this is why some engines might not play Qxb6.

Personally, I'd feel the same and play 22.c5 playing for kingside attack with a clamp on the pawn structure, safer king and more space, but the 22.Kh2 would be too artificial (or sophisticated) for me to play.
Top
whereagles
Posts: 565
Joined: Thu Nov 13, 2014 12:03 pm

Re: Deep Shredder 13 vs. Chiron 4

Post by whereagles »

This is the most beautiful engine game I've ever seen.

The play is suboptimal, but just look at the position after 30... exd2. Unbelievable!! Well done, critter :wink:

[pgn][Event "TCEC - Season 7 - Stage 1a"]
[Site "http://tcec.chessdom.com"]
[Date "2014.09.23"]
[EventDate "2014.09.19"]
[Round "4"]
[Result "0-1"]
[White "Arasan (Computer)"]
[Black "Critter (Computer)"]
[ECO "A34"]
[WhiteElo "?"]
[BlackElo "?"]
[PlyCount "76"]

1. c4 c5 2. Nf3 Nf6 3. Nc3 d5 4. cxd5 Nxd5 5. g3 Nxc3 6. bxc3
g6 7. Bg2 Bg7 8. O-O O-O 9. Qa4 Qb6 10. Qh4 Nc6 11. a4 Bd7
12. Ba3 Qa5 13. Rfb1 b6 14. Bb2 Rad8 15. Qf4 e5 16. Qc4 Be6
17. Qh4 h6 18. d3 Rfe8 19. Nd2 Nd4 20. cxd4 Qxd2 21. dxc5 bxc5
22. Bc6 c4 23. Bxe8 Rxe8 24. Qe4 c3 25. Ba3 Bf5 26. Qd5 c2
27. Re1 e4 28. Qb5 Re6 29. Bb4 e3 30. Bxd2 exd2 31. Qb4 Rxe2
32. Rxe2 d1=Q+ 33. Rxd1 cxd1=Q+ 34. Re1 Qxd3 35. Qb8+ Kh7
36. Qxa7 Qd5 37. Qe3 Bc3 38. g4 Bxe1 0-1

[/pgn]
Top
BrendanJNorman
Posts: 2526
Joined: Mon Feb 08, 2016 12:43 am
Full name: Brendan J Norman

Re: Deep Shredder 13 vs. Chiron 4

Post by BrendanJNorman »

whereagles wrote:This is the most beautiful engine game I've ever seen.

The play is suboptimal, but just look at the position after 30... exd2. Unbelievable!! Well done, critter :wink:

[pgn][Event "TCEC - Season 7 - Stage 1a"]
[Site "http://tcec.chessdom.com"]
[Date "2014.09.23"]
[EventDate "2014.09.19"]
[Round "4"]
[Result "0-1"]
[White "Arasan (Computer)"]
[Black "Critter (Computer)"]
[ECO "A34"]
[WhiteElo "?"]
[BlackElo "?"]
[PlyCount "76"]

1. c4 c5 2. Nf3 Nf6 3. Nc3 d5 4. cxd5 Nxd5 5. g3 Nxc3 6. bxc3
g6 7. Bg2 Bg7 8. O-O O-O 9. Qa4 Qb6 10. Qh4 Nc6 11. a4 Bd7
12. Ba3 Qa5 13. Rfb1 b6 14. Bb2 Rad8 15. Qf4 e5 16. Qc4 Be6
17. Qh4 h6 18. d3 Rfe8 19. Nd2 Nd4 20. cxd4 Qxd2 21. dxc5 bxc5
22. Bc6 c4 23. Bxe8 Rxe8 24. Qe4 c3 25. Ba3 Bf5 26. Qd5 c2
27. Re1 e4 28. Qb5 Re6 29. Bb4 e3 30. Bxd2 exd2 31. Qb4 Rxe2
32. Rxe2 d1=Q+ 33. Rxd1 cxd1=Q+ 34. Re1 Qxd3 35. Qb8+ Kh7
36. Qxa7 Qd5 37. Qe3 Bc3 38. g4 Bxe1 0-1

[/pgn]
Absolutely beautiful.

I must say that such beautiful pawn play is a regular feature of Critter's wins. Really a shame that such a brilliant engine is discontinued.
Top
User avatar
MikeB
Posts: 4889
Joined: Thu Mar 09, 2006 6:34 am
Location: Pen Argyl, Pennsylvania

Re: Deep Shredder 13 vs. Chiron 4

Post by MikeB »

BrendanJNorman wrote:
MikeB wrote:
MikeGL wrote: ...

Did you see that quiet 36...Ra7! move of black? It forces and completes the fencing/trapping of the Na4. after 36...Ra7! the N of white has nowhere to go and will be recaptured within a few more moves. Haven't seen that kind of depth and accuracy in any GM games.

Anyway, here's how Deep Shredder shows of its gambit skills against Chiron 4, the Italy's number 1 engine rated 3100+ in an Alekhines Defence. This is a Brilliant game by DS13 too.

[pgn]
[Event "?"]
[Site "?"]
[Round "1"]
[White "Deep Shredder 13"]
[Black "Chiron 4"]
[Result "1-0"]
[Variation "Balogh Variation"]
[TimeControl "3600+15"]
[Termination "normal"]
[PlyCount "103"]
[WhiteType "human"]
[BlackType "human"]

1. e4 {book} Nf6 {book} 2. e5 {book} Nd5 {book} 3. d4 {book} d6 {book} 4.
Bc4 {book} c6 {book} 5. Qe2 {book} dxe5 {book} 6. dxe5 {book} Bf5 {book} 7.
Nf3 {book} e6 {book} 8. O-O {book} Nd7 {book} 9. a3 {+0.09/27 111s} Bg4
{-0.23/25 197s} 10. Re1 {+0.01/31 123s} Qc7 {+0.08/25 94s} 11. Nbd2
{0.00/32 85s} Be7 {+0.10/25 92s} 12. Ba2 {-0.01/32 159s} Rd8 {+0.21/25 90s}
13. h3 {0.00/30 80s} Bh5 {+0.09/25 88s} 14. Bb1 {0.00/33 68s} a5 {+0.18/26
155s} 15. c4 {-0.02/29 97s} Nf4 {+0.17/27 83s} 16. Qe3 {0.00/30 63s} g5
{+0.17/24 82s} 17. b4 {0.00/30 60s} axb4 {-0.12/23 144s} 18. axb4 {+0.03/30
79s} Bxb4 {-0.13/24 81s} 19. Ba3 {0.00/30 64s} Bxf3 {-0.05/24 209s} 20.
Bxb4 {+0.70/31 89s} Bxg2 {-0.68/28 71s} 21. Bd6 {+0.77/33 89s} Qb6
{-0.72/28 109s} 22. Bc2 {+0.78/32 60s} Bxh3 {-0.57/27 67s} 23. Qxb6
{+0.76/33 108s} Nxb6 {-0.73/27 67s} 24. Ne4 {+0.99/33 166s} Nd7 {-0.83/29
65s} 25. Reb1 {+1.80/31 99s} Ne2+ {-0.65/25 66s} 26. Kh2 {+3.50/28 91s} Bf5
{-0.88/29 62s} 27. Rxb7 {+4.79/31 150s} Nd4 {-1.20/29 62s} 28. Nf6+
{+21.21/32 116s} Nxf6 {0.00/10 0s} 29. exf6 {+30.33/31 76s} Nf3+ {-11.60/29
64s} 30. Kh1 {+M65/38 86s} Ne5 {-21.92/29 70s} (30. .. Bxc2) 31. Bxf5
{+30.35/38 133s} exf5 {-31.10/31 150s} 32. Re7+ {+M47/35 53s} Kf8
{-31.10/10 0.015s} 33. Rea7+ {+M41/37 90s} Kg8 {-M38/33 156s} 34. Ra8
{+M39/37 65s} h6 {-M36/31 52s} 35. Rxd8+ {+M37/35 55s} Kh7 {-M34/10 0s} 36.
Rxh8+ {+M35/35 93s} Kxh8 {-M32/30 51s} 37. Bxe5 {+M31/33 49s} f4 {-M30/29
78s} 38. Ra7 {+M29/29 15s} Kg8 {-M30/27 49s} 39. c5 {+M27/27 6.7s} g4
{-M26/29 48s} 40. Rc7 {+M25/25 1.8s} h5 {-M24/29 47s} 41. Bxf4 {+M23/23
0.98s} Kh7 {-M22/28 46s} 42. Rxc6 {+M21/21 0.28s} Kg6 {-M20/28 46s} 43. Ra6
{+M19/19 0.16s} h4 {-M18/28 105s} 44. c6 {+M17/17 0.25s} g3 {-M16/32 43s}
45. fxg3 {+M15/15 0.016s} Kf5 {-M14/37 43s} 46. c7 {+M13/13 0s} hxg3
{-M12/57 41s} 47. Kg2 {+M11/11 0.015s} Kxf4 {-M10/128 13s} 48. c8=Q {+M9/9
0s} Kg5 {-M8/128 11s} 49. Kxg3 {+M7/7 0s} Kh5 {-M6/128 0.86s} 50. Qg4+
{+M5/5 0s} Kh6 {-M4/10 0s} 51. Qg7+ {+M3/3 0s} Kh5 {-M2/10 0s} 52. Ra5#
{+M1/1 0s, White mates} 1-0
[/pgn]

Throwing 3 pawns for free in exchange for an attack on the uncastled king of black. Materially black is ahead, but DS13 proved that his position and initiative compensated for his lost material. Very nice attack.
very nice game - a quiet move not played was 22.Kh2! delaying the exchange...

[d]3rk2r/1p1n1p1p/1qpBp3/4P1p1/2P2n2/4Q2P/3N1Pb1/RB2R1K1 w k - 2 22

Code: Select all

30	+2.04 	1.24G	1:59.41	Kh2 Rg8 Rg1 f5 exf6 Qxe3 fxe3 Nxf6 c5 g4 exf4 gxh3 Be4 Ng4+ Kg3 Bxe4 Nxe4 h2 Rh1 Nf6+ Kf3 Nxe4 Kxe4 Rg2 Ra3 b6 Kf3 Rd2 Bc7 R2d3+ Rxd3 Rxd3+ Ke4 Rh3 cxb6 Kd7 f5 exf5+ Kd4 Kc8 Rxh2 Rxh2 Bxh2 Kb7 Kc5 h5 Bg3 h4 Bxh4
The idea of 22.Kh2 isn't to delay the exchange, but to:

1. Play Rg1 attacking the bishop which is short of squares, and force ...Bxh3, which kicks the bishop off the h1-a8 diagonal, thus allowing Ne4 without fear of exchange with ....Bxe4 (a knight on e4 is much superior to a bishop there).

2. Play Ne4 and continue attacking the kingside.

Just a note: black cannot play ...Qxe3 because fxe3 wins a piece, so Kh2 also uses this point to buy time for the Rg1 idea.

Generally speaking, the attacking side should not trade queens and this is why some engines might not play Qxb6.

Personally, I'd feel the same and play 22.c5 playing for kingside attack with a clamp on the pawn structure, safer king and more space, but the 22.Kh2 would be too artificial (or sophisticated) for me to play.
haha - well that is what I meant - but I was too lazy to spell it all out - thanks
Top
User avatar
AdminX
Posts: 6340
Joined: Mon Mar 13, 2006 2:34 pm
Location: Acworth, GA

Re: Rare beautiful games of the top engines

Post by AdminX »

A complicated Sicilian Taimanov between Hiarcs and Wasp


[pgn][Event "5 Minutes/Game"]
[Site "june, HAKIN94LIFE"]
[Date "2017.06.02"]
[Round "1.1"]
[White "Deep HIARCS 14 WCSC [2]"]
[Black "Wasp 2.01 [2]"]
[Result "0-1"]
[ECO "B47"]
[Annotator "CB14 Komodo Assisted Analysis"]
[PlyCount "168"]
[EventDate "2017.??.??"]

1. e4 {book 0s} c5 {book 0s} 2. Nf3 {book 0s} e6 {book 0s} 3. d4 {book 0s} cxd4
{book 0s} 4. Nxd4 {book 0s} Nc6 {book 0s} 5. Nc3 {book 0s} Qc7 {book 0s} 6.
Ndb5 {book 0s} Qb8 {book 0s} 7. Be3 {book 0s} a6 {0.33/20 15} 8. Bb6 {book 0s
(Nd4). B47: Sicilian: Taimanov: 5 Nc3 Qc7 6 f4, 6 g3 and 6 Be2} axb5 {-0.14/20
9} 9. Nxb5 {book 0s LiveBook: 84 Games} Ra4 {0.00/20 14} (9... Bb4+ 10. c3 Ba5
11. Nc7+ Qxc7 12. Bxc7 Bxc7 13. Qg4 g6 14. Bb5 Nge7 15. Qe2 d5 16. O-O O-O 17.
Rfd1 dxe4 18. Qxe4 {1/2-1/2 (34) Popov,I (2632)-Gagunashvili,M (2601) Denizli
2013}) 10. Nc7+ {0.35/19 15 The position is equal.} Ke7 {-0.06/21 0} 11. c4 {
0.35/19 10 (Bc5+). White has compensation.} Ra5 {-0.12/20 9} 12. c5 {0.28/18 0}
f6 $1 {-0.21/20 9} 13. b4 {0.46/17 3 (Bxa5)} Ra3 {-0.14/21 9 (Ra7)} 14. Nb5 {
0.50/18 14} Qa8 $1 {-0.05/21 0} (14... Qe5 $2 15. Qd6+ Qxd6 16. cxd6+ Kf7 17.
Nxa3 $18) 15. Nd6 $146 {0.60/17 14 (Qd2)} ({Predecessor:} 15. Qc1 Rxa2 16. Rxa2
Qxa2 {0-1 (55) Ferreira,L (1815)-Munoz,L (1801) ICCF email 2010}) 15... Nxb4 {
-0.85/18 10 (g6)} 16. Bb5 {0.01/18 25} Nh6 {-0.86/21 0 (g6)} 17. Qd2 {-0.46/27
12} (17. e5 $1 $14 {0.36/27}) 17... Nc6 $15 {-0.86/21 0} 18. O-O {-0.34/17 5
(Qb2)} Qb8 {0.08/26 9 (Nf7)} (18... Nf7 $15 {-0.61/25}) 19. Bd3 {-0.95/28 16
(Rad1)} (19. Qb2 $11 {0.08/26} Ra8 20. f4) 19... Nf7 $17 {-1.22/18 9} 20. Nb5
$1 {-0.86/18 0} Ra6 {-1.20/19 8} 21. f4 {-0.85/18 0} g6 {-1.13/18 8 (Rxb6)} 22.
Nc7 {-0.68/16 6 (Kh1)} Ra4 {-1.13/19 8} 23. Qc2 {-0.64/16 0 (Qd1)} Ra3 {
0.00/24 7 (Rd4)} (23... Rd4 $15 {-0.61/26} 24. Nb5 Rb4) 24. Bc4 $11 {-0.64/16
5 (Rab1)} Bg7 {-1.12/18 7 (Bh6). Black wants to play ...f5.} 25. Rad1 {-0.63/
16 7 (Nb5)} f5 {-1.10/17 7 White must now prevent ...Re3.} 26. Nb5 {-0.96/23 2
(e5)} (26. Bb3 $1 $11 {-0.06/24}) 26... Ra6 {0.40/28 6} (26... Qa8 $17 {
-0.96/23}) 27. exf5 {-0.59/17 8 (Bb3)} gxf5 {-1.16/18 6 (Rxb6)} 28. Bc7 {
-0.77/17 8} Qa8 $1 {-1.30/18 0} ({But not} 28... Nd4 $2 29. Qd2 (29. Bxb8 $2
Nxc2 30. Rf3 Ra4 $19) 29... Qa8 30. Nxd4 Bxd4+ 31. Qxd4 $18) 29. Nd6 {-1.35/25
5 (Rfe1)} (29. Bd6+ $11 {0.00/25} Nxd6 30. cxd6+ Kf8 31. Bxe6 $1 dxe6 32. d7)
29... Nxd6 $1 $17 {-1.10/17 6} 30. Bxd6+ {-1.10/17 0} Ke8 {-1.04/19 5} 31. Qf2
{-2.22/26 0 (Rfe1)} (31. Rfe1 $17 {-1.41/24 is a better defense.} Nd4 32. Qf2
Rxd6 33. cxd6) 31... Bf6 $19 {-1.63/19 5} 32. Bxa6 {-1.40/16 0} Qxa6 {-1.60/19
5 (bxa6)} 33. Rd2 {-1.46/18 5} Rg8 {-1.61/19 0 (Qc4)} 34. Qf3 {-1.37/17 5} Rg4
{-1.68/19 0} 35. Rb1 {-1.96/27 4 (h3)} (35. h3 $17 {-1.38/27} Rh4 36. Rb1)
35... Kf7 {-1.71/17 5} 36. Kh1 {-1.54/17 0 (Qd3)} Qa4 {-1.67/17 6 (Na5)} 37.
Qh3 {-1.52/15 4 (Qd1)} Kg7 {-1.65/18 6} 38. Qh5 {-1.53/17 0 (Qd3)} Qe4 {
-1.77/19 4} 39. Rf1 {-1.57/19 0 (Rbd1)} Kh8 {-1.31/29 4 (Rg6)} ({Better is}
39... Rg6 $19 {-1.89/28} 40. Qf3 Qa4) 40. Qf7 $17 {-1.21/16 4 (Qh3)} Bc3 {
-0.56/29 3 (Bd4)} (40... Bd4 $17 {-1.55/30} 41. a3 Rg7 42. Qf8+ Rg8) 41. Bf8 $1
$15 {-0.96/18 12 (a3)} Qc4 $1 {-1.56/17 3 [#]} 42. Rdf2 {-0.81/28 0 (Rg1)} (42.
Rf3 $11 {-0.23/32 remains equal.} Nb4 43. h3) 42... Bd4 {0.00/37 3 (Rg8)} (
42... Rg8 $1 $17 {-0.81/28 ...b6! is the strong threat.} 43. Rg1 Qd4) 43. Rf3
$11 {-0.46/17 3 (Rd1). Threatens to win with Rg1!} Qe2 {-1.25/16 4} 44. R3f2 $1
{0.00/19 0} Qc4 {-1.22/17 4} (44... Bxf2 45. Bg7+) 45. Rf3 {0.00/20 0 [#]
aiming for Rg1!} b5 {-1.36/17 2 (Qe2)} 46. Re1 $1 {-0.19/16 2 (Rg1). White
wants to mate with Rh3.} e5 {-0.25/18 8} 47. Qf6+ {-0.72/32 0} (47. Qe8 $1 $11
{0.00/30 keeps the balance.} e4 48. Rg3 Rxg3 49. hxg3) 47... Kg8 $17 {-0.26/18
2} 48. Bd6 {-0.19/19 0} Qf7 {-0.36/18 2} 49. fxe5 {-0.22/19 0} Qxf6 {-0.20/18 2
} 50. exf6 {-0.22/19 0} Kf7 $1 {-0.34/18 2} 51. Rxf5 {-0.36/18 0} Rg6 {-0.50/
17 1 (Bxf6)} 52. Rh5 {-0.57/17 8 (Be7)} h6 {-0.53/16 2} ({Reject} 52... Rxf6
53. Rxh7+ Kg6 54. Rh4 $11) 53. Bg3 {-0.61/17 0 (Re4)} Rxf6 {-0.77/18 2} ({
Of course not} 53... Kxf6 54. Re8 Na7 55. Rd5 $11) 54. Bh4 {-0.60/18 0} Re6 {
-0.77/17 1} 55. Rf5+ {-0.57/18 1 (Rxe6)} Kg6 {-0.83/19 1 (Kg7)} 56. Rd5 {
-0.52/17 1} Be3 {-0.78/18 0} 57. Rd3 {-0.64/19 2} Bd4 $36 {-0.81/19 0 Black is
pushing.} 58. Rg3+ {-0.57/19 2} Kh5 {-0.78/20 0 (Kh7)} (58... Kh7 {is
interesting.} 59. Rxe6 dxe6 60. a3 Bg7 61. Rd3 Nd4) 59. Rh3 {-0.57/19 2} Rxe1+
{-0.72/20 0} 60. Bxe1+ {-0.78/18 0} Kg6 {-0.85/19 1} 61. Rg3+ {-0.79/19 0} Kf5
{-0.82/20 1} 62. Rf3+ {-1.35/29 0 (Bf2)} ({White should try} 62. Bd2 {-0.74/29}
) 62... Ke4 {-0.93/20 1} 63. Bf2 {-2.43/31 0} (63. Bd2 $17 {-1.18/28 was
necessary.}) 63... Bxf2 {-1.25/31 2 (b4)} (63... Ne5 $1 $19 {-2.43/31} 64. Rf6
Bxf2 65. Rxf2 Bb7) 64. Rxf2 {-1.06/20 2} Kd4 {-1.00/20 0} 65. Rf6 {-2.42/30 2
(Rf8)} (65. g4 $17 {-0.96/28}) 65... Kxc5 $19 {-1.00/19 1} 66. Rxh6 {-0.90/19 0
} d5 {-1.04/18 1} 67. Kg1 {-1.07/18 1} d4 {-1.06/16 0} 68. h4 $2 {-9.22/31 4
(Kf2)} (68. Kf2 $17 {-1.43/27}) 68... d3 {-1.23/16 1 (Ne5)} 69. Kf2 {-2.06/21 6
} Ne5 $1 {-1.47/19 0 Hoping for ...Ng4+.} 70. Rh8 {-2.06/20 1} Be6 $2 {0.00/27
0 (Bf5)} (70... Bf5 $1 $19 {-6.75/29} 71. Rf8 Bg6) 71. Ke3 $2 {-8.44/24 2 (Re8)
} (71. Re8 $11 {0.00/27} Kd6 72. Rd8+ Kc5 73. a3) 71... Bxa2 $2 {-0.40/27 1} ({
Black should play} 71... Kb4 $1 $19 {-8.44/24} 72. Kd2 Bf5 73. a3+ Kb3) 72. Re8
$1 $15 {-1.19/18 0} Kd6 {-1.60/16 0 Strongly threatening ...Bb1.} 73. Rd8+ $2 {
-3.19/35 0 (Rb8)} (73. Rb8 $1 $15 {-0.40/27}) 73... Ke7 $1 $19 {-1.65/16 1
(Ke6)} 74. Rd4 {-1.18/17 1} Bg8 $1 {-1.67/17 0 (Bf7). And now ...Bh7 would win.
} 75. Kd2 $2 {-250.00/40 3 (Kf2)} (75. Rb4 $17 {-0.82/29}) 75... Bh7 {-1.49/17
1} 76. Kc3 {-1.18/18 2 (h5)} Nc4 {-2.27/18 1 (Ke6)} 77. g4 {-0.60/17 1 (Kb4)}
d2 {-2.11/18 1 (Ke6). Black mates.} 78. h5 {-1.71/17 1} Kf6 {-2.53/19 0} 79.
Rd5 {-1.97/17 3} Ke6 {-3.23/19 0 (Bg8)} 80. Rd4 {-1.75/16 0} Ke5 {-3.17/19 0
(Bg8)} 81. Rd8 {-2.17/17 1 (h6)} Bg8 $1 {-3.69/17 0 (Kf4)} 82. Kc2 {-4.28/17 6}
(82. Rxg8 d1=Q) 82... b4 {-3.80/20 0 (Be6)} 83. Rxg8 {-9.44/16 8 (Rxd2)} b3+ $1
{-7.89/16 0} 84. Kd1 {-9.81/17 0} (84. Kxb3 d1=Q+) 84... Kd4 $1 {-8.19/16 0}
0-1

[/pgn]

Code: Select all


[Event "5 Minutes/Game"]
[Site "june, HAKIN94LIFE"]
[Date "2017.06.02"]
[Round "1.1"]
[White "Deep HIARCS 14 WCSC [2]"]
[Black "Wasp 2.01 [2]"]
[Result "0-1"]
[ECO "B47"]
[Annotator "CB14 Komodo Assisted Analysis"]
[PlyCount "168"]
[EventDate "2017.??.??"]

1. e4 {book 0s} c5 {book 0s} 2. Nf3 {book 0s} e6 {book 0s} 3. d4 {book 0s} cxd4
{book 0s} 4. Nxd4 {book 0s} Nc6 {book 0s} 5. Nc3 {book 0s} Qc7 {book 0s} 6.
Ndb5 {book 0s} Qb8 {book 0s} 7. Be3 {book 0s} a6 {0.33/20 15} 8. Bb6 {book 0s 
(Nd4). B47: Sicilian: Taimanov: 5 Nc3 Qc7 6 f4, 6 g3 and 6 Be2} axb5 {-0.14/20
9} 9. Nxb5 {book 0s LiveBook: 84 Games} Ra4 {0.00/20 14} (9... Bb4+ 10. c3 Ba5
11. Nc7+ Qxc7 12. Bxc7 Bxc7 13. Qg4 g6 14. Bb5 Nge7 15. Qe2 d5 16. O-O O-O 17.
Rfd1 dxe4 18. Qxe4 {1/2-1/2 (34) Popov,I (2632)-Gagunashvili,M (2601) Denizli
2013}) 10. Nc7+ {0.35/19 15 The position is equal.} Ke7 {-0.06/21 0} 11. c4 {
0.35/19 10 (Bc5+). White has compensation.} Ra5 {-0.12/20 9} 12. c5 {0.28/18 0}
f6 $1 {-0.21/20 9} 13. b4 {0.46/17 3 (Bxa5)} Ra3 {-0.14/21 9 (Ra7)} 14. Nb5 {
0.50/18 14} Qa8 $1 {-0.05/21 0} (14... Qe5 $2 15. Qd6+ Qxd6 16. cxd6+ Kf7 17.
Nxa3 $18) 15. Nd6 $146 {0.60/17 14 (Qd2)} ({Predecessor:} 15. Qc1 Rxa2 16. Rxa2
Qxa2 {0-1 (55) Ferreira,L (1815)-Munoz,L (1801) ICCF email 2010}) 15... Nxb4 {
-0.85/18 10 (g6)} 16. Bb5 {0.01/18 25} Nh6 {-0.86/21 0 (g6)} 17. Qd2 {-0.46/27
12} (17. e5 $1 $14 {0.36/27}) 17... Nc6 $15 {-0.86/21 0} 18. O-O {-0.34/17 5 
(Qb2)} Qb8 {0.08/26 9 (Nf7)} (18... Nf7 $15 {-0.61/25}) 19. Bd3 {-0.95/28 16 
(Rad1)} (19. Qb2 $11 {0.08/26} Ra8 20. f4) 19... Nf7 $17 {-1.22/18 9} 20. Nb5
$1 {-0.86/18 0} Ra6 {-1.20/19 8} 21. f4 {-0.85/18 0} g6 {-1.13/18 8 (Rxb6)} 22.
Nc7 {-0.68/16 6 (Kh1)} Ra4 {-1.13/19 8} 23. Qc2 {-0.64/16 0 (Qd1)} Ra3 {
0.00/24 7 (Rd4)} (23... Rd4 $15 {-0.61/26} 24. Nb5 Rb4) 24. Bc4 $11 {-0.64/16
5 (Rab1)} Bg7 {-1.12/18 7 (Bh6). Black wants to play ...f5.} 25. Rad1 {-0.63/
16 7 (Nb5)} f5 {-1.10/17 7 White must now prevent ...Re3.} 26. Nb5 {-0.96/23 2
(e5)} (26. Bb3 $1 $11 {-0.06/24}) 26... Ra6 {0.40/28 6} (26... Qa8 $17 {
-0.96/23}) 27. exf5 {-0.59/17 8 (Bb3)} gxf5 {-1.16/18 6 (Rxb6)} 28. Bc7 {
-0.77/17 8} Qa8 $1 {-1.30/18 0} ({But not} 28... Nd4 $2 29. Qd2 (29. Bxb8 $2
Nxc2 30. Rf3 Ra4 $19) 29... Qa8 30. Nxd4 Bxd4+ 31. Qxd4 $18) 29. Nd6 {-1.35/25
5 (Rfe1)} (29. Bd6+ $11 {0.00/25} Nxd6 30. cxd6+ Kf8 31. Bxe6 $1 dxe6 32. d7)
29... Nxd6 $1 $17 {-1.10/17 6} 30. Bxd6+ {-1.10/17 0} Ke8 {-1.04/19 5} 31. Qf2
{-2.22/26 0 (Rfe1)} (31. Rfe1 $17 {-1.41/24 is a better defense.} Nd4 32. Qf2
Rxd6 33. cxd6) 31... Bf6 $19 {-1.63/19 5} 32. Bxa6 {-1.40/16 0} Qxa6 {-1.60/19
5 (bxa6)} 33. Rd2 {-1.46/18 5} Rg8 {-1.61/19 0 (Qc4)} 34. Qf3 {-1.37/17 5} Rg4
{-1.68/19 0} 35. Rb1 {-1.96/27 4 (h3)} (35. h3 $17 {-1.38/27} Rh4 36. Rb1)
35... Kf7 {-1.71/17 5} 36. Kh1 {-1.54/17 0 (Qd3)} Qa4 {-1.67/17 6 (Na5)} 37.
Qh3 {-1.52/15 4 (Qd1)} Kg7 {-1.65/18 6} 38. Qh5 {-1.53/17 0 (Qd3)} Qe4 {
-1.77/19 4} 39. Rf1 {-1.57/19 0 (Rbd1)} Kh8 {-1.31/29 4 (Rg6)} ({Better is} 
39... Rg6 $19 {-1.89/28} 40. Qf3 Qa4) 40. Qf7 $17 {-1.21/16 4 (Qh3)} Bc3 {
-0.56/29 3 (Bd4)} (40... Bd4 $17 {-1.55/30} 41. a3 Rg7 42. Qf8+ Rg8) 41. Bf8 $1
$15 {-0.96/18 12 (a3)} Qc4 $1 {-1.56/17 3 [#]} 42. Rdf2 {-0.81/28 0 (Rg1)} (42.
Rf3 $11 {-0.23/32 remains equal.} Nb4 43. h3) 42... Bd4 {0.00/37 3 (Rg8)} (
42... Rg8 $1 $17 {-0.81/28 ...b6! is the strong threat.} 43. Rg1 Qd4) 43. Rf3
$11 {-0.46/17 3 (Rd1). Threatens to win with Rg1!} Qe2 {-1.25/16 4} 44. R3f2 $1
{0.00/19 0} Qc4 {-1.22/17 4} (44... Bxf2 45. Bg7+) 45. Rf3 {0.00/20 0 [#]
aiming for Rg1!} b5 {-1.36/17 2 (Qe2)} 46. Re1 $1 {-0.19/16 2 (Rg1). White
wants to mate with Rh3.} e5 {-0.25/18 8} 47. Qf6+ {-0.72/32 0} (47. Qe8 $1 $11
{0.00/30 keeps the balance.} e4 48. Rg3 Rxg3 49. hxg3) 47... Kg8 $17 {-0.26/18
2} 48. Bd6 {-0.19/19 0} Qf7 {-0.36/18 2} 49. fxe5 {-0.22/19 0} Qxf6 {-0.20/18 2
} 50. exf6 {-0.22/19 0} Kf7 $1 {-0.34/18 2} 51. Rxf5 {-0.36/18 0} Rg6 {-0.50/
17 1 (Bxf6)} 52. Rh5 {-0.57/17 8 (Be7)} h6 {-0.53/16 2} ({Reject} 52... Rxf6
53. Rxh7+ Kg6 54. Rh4 $11) 53. Bg3 {-0.61/17 0 (Re4)} Rxf6 {-0.77/18 2} ({
Of course not} 53... Kxf6 54. Re8 Na7 55. Rd5 $11) 54. Bh4 {-0.60/18 0} Re6 {
-0.77/17 1} 55. Rf5+ {-0.57/18 1 (Rxe6)} Kg6 {-0.83/19 1 (Kg7)} 56. Rd5 {
-0.52/17 1} Be3 {-0.78/18 0} 57. Rd3 {-0.64/19 2} Bd4 $36 {-0.81/19 0 Black is
pushing.} 58. Rg3+ {-0.57/19 2} Kh5 {-0.78/20 0 (Kh7)} (58... Kh7 {is
interesting.} 59. Rxe6 dxe6 60. a3 Bg7 61. Rd3 Nd4) 59. Rh3 {-0.57/19 2} Rxe1+
{-0.72/20 0} 60. Bxe1+ {-0.78/18 0} Kg6 {-0.85/19 1} 61. Rg3+ {-0.79/19 0} Kf5
{-0.82/20 1} 62. Rf3+ {-1.35/29 0 (Bf2)} ({White should try} 62. Bd2 {-0.74/29}
) 62... Ke4 {-0.93/20 1} 63. Bf2 {-2.43/31 0} (63. Bd2 $17 {-1.18/28 was
necessary.}) 63... Bxf2 {-1.25/31 2 (b4)} (63... Ne5 $1 $19 {-2.43/31} 64. Rf6
Bxf2 65. Rxf2 Bb7) 64. Rxf2 {-1.06/20 2} Kd4 {-1.00/20 0} 65. Rf6 {-2.42/30 2 
(Rf8)} (65. g4 $17 {-0.96/28}) 65... Kxc5 $19 {-1.00/19 1} 66. Rxh6 {-0.90/19 0
} d5 {-1.04/18 1} 67. Kg1 {-1.07/18 1} d4 {-1.06/16 0} 68. h4 $2 {-9.22/31 4 
(Kf2)} (68. Kf2 $17 {-1.43/27}) 68... d3 {-1.23/16 1 (Ne5)} 69. Kf2 {-2.06/21 6
} Ne5 $1 {-1.47/19 0 Hoping for ...Ng4+.} 70. Rh8 {-2.06/20 1} Be6 $2 {0.00/27
0 (Bf5)} (70... Bf5 $1 $19 {-6.75/29} 71. Rf8 Bg6) 71. Ke3 $2 {-8.44/24 2 (Re8)
} (71. Re8 $11 {0.00/27} Kd6 72. Rd8+ Kc5 73. a3) 71... Bxa2 $2 {-0.40/27 1} ({
Black should play} 71... Kb4 $1 $19 {-8.44/24} 72. Kd2 Bf5 73. a3+ Kb3) 72. Re8
$1 $15 {-1.19/18 0} Kd6 {-1.60/16 0 Strongly threatening ...Bb1.} 73. Rd8+ $2 {
-3.19/35 0 (Rb8)} (73. Rb8 $1 $15 {-0.40/27}) 73... Ke7 $1 $19 {-1.65/16 1 
(Ke6)} 74. Rd4 {-1.18/17 1} Bg8 $1 {-1.67/17 0 (Bf7). And now ...Bh7 would win.
} 75. Kd2 $2 {-250.00/40 3 (Kf2)} (75. Rb4 $17 {-0.82/29}) 75... Bh7 {-1.49/17
1} 76. Kc3 {-1.18/18 2 (h5)} Nc4 {-2.27/18 1 (Ke6)} 77. g4 {-0.60/17 1 (Kb4)}
d2 {-2.11/18 1 (Ke6). Black mates.} 78. h5 {-1.71/17 1} Kf6 {-2.53/19 0} 79.
Rd5 {-1.97/17 3} Ke6 {-3.23/19 0 (Bg8)} 80. Rd4 {-1.75/16 0} Ke5 {-3.17/19 0 
(Bg8)} 81. Rd8 {-2.17/17 1 (h6)} Bg8 $1 {-3.69/17 0 (Kf4)} 82. Kc2 {-4.28/17 6}
(82. Rxg8 d1=Q) 82... b4 {-3.80/20 0 (Be6)} 83. Rxg8 {-9.44/16 8 (Rxd2)} b3+ $1
{-7.89/16 0} 84. Kd1 {-9.81/17 0} (84. Kxb3 d1=Q+) 84... Kd4 $1 {-8.19/16 0}
0-1
"Good decisions come from experience, and experience comes from bad decisions."
__________________________________________________________________
Ted Summers
Top

Return to “Computer Chess Club: General Topics”