hi ALL
actually I am playing a match between Houdini 6.03 pext, Stockfish 180218 Bmi2 and Komodo 2016.00 Bmi2.
Time for a game is 45 min + 10sec., 75rounds/225 games
Engines use 15 cpu, full set of Syzygy tablebases, hashtables 8192MB
ponder is ON
Shredder GUI, small 5mvs book
Games are running on a E5-2697A v4 machine (two 16 core cpu on board).
Fist games can be reviewed here
http://www.clemens-keck.de/ReplayZone/quovadis.htm
crosstable
http://www.clemens-keck.de/ReplayZone/QuoVadis.html
live view, update frequenzy 30 sec
http://www.clemens-keck.de/screen/
regards, Clemens Keck
Quo Vadis Houdini, Stockfish, Komodo
Moderators: hgm, Rebel, chrisw
-
- Posts: 782
- Joined: Tue Dec 01, 2009 11:10 am
Re: Quo Vadis Houdini, Stockfish, Komodo
Hi All
tournament is still running.
Standings after 122 games:
since round 39.2 I use the feobos c3 book. Am curious about the games.
All files updated and live view too.
regards, C.K.
tournament is still running.
Standings after 122 games:
Code: Select all
1 Stockfish 180218 64 BMI2 t15 43.5 / 82
2 Komodo 2016.00 64-bit t15 41.0 / 81
3 Houdini 6.03 Pro x64-pext t15 37.5 / 81
All files updated and live view too.
regards, C.K.
-
- Posts: 1737
- Joined: Sun Dec 13, 2009 6:09 pm
Re: Quo Vadis Houdini, Stockfish, Komodo
Thanks for this interesting tournament.
Contempt is default for everyone?
Contempt is default for everyone?
-
- Posts: 782
- Joined: Tue Dec 01, 2009 11:10 am
Re: Quo Vadis Houdini, Stockfish, Komodo
Hi,
Komodo contempt is 0.
All others contempt is default.
regards, C.K.
Komodo contempt is 0.
All others contempt is default.
regards, C.K.
-
- Posts: 3293
- Joined: Wed Mar 08, 2006 8:15 pm
Re: Quo Vadis Houdini, Stockfish, Komodo
In this and YLCET tournament Komodo is now beating Houdini. But TCEC is different so far with older 2012.00 version.
Jouni
-
- Posts: 2821
- Joined: Fri Sep 25, 2015 9:38 pm
- Location: Sortland, Norway
Re: Quo Vadis Houdini, Stockfish, Komodo
Clemens Keck: Mark Lefler said in tcec chat that PB=enabled on dual xeon system is not necessarily worse off than PB=off. What is your impression with ponder enabled so far?
-
- Posts: 782
- Joined: Tue Dec 01, 2009 11:10 am
Re: Quo Vadis Houdini, Stockfish, Komodo
ponder off is very entertaining
You can see and compare the engines calculation.
15 cores is really enough for a good performance, and ponder on tournaments are seldom.
Komodo does well so far, seems to be improved.
C.K.
You can see and compare the engines calculation.
15 cores is really enough for a good performance, and ponder on tournaments are seldom.
Komodo does well so far, seems to be improved.
C.K.
-
- Posts: 2821
- Joined: Fri Sep 25, 2015 9:38 pm
- Location: Sortland, Norway
Re: Quo Vadis Houdini, Stockfish, Komodo
From Houdini manual:
The objectively highest level of play is achieved without contempt, i.e. Contempt value 0.
A contempt value of 2 will typically reduce the draw rate in a match by about 4%.
So for tournament matches against K and SF, C=0 is better choise against default.
H with C=0 might perform better in same ongoing match i suppose.
The objectively highest level of play is achieved without contempt, i.e. Contempt value 0.
A contempt value of 2 will typically reduce the draw rate in a match by about 4%.
So for tournament matches against K and SF, C=0 is better choise against default.
H with C=0 might perform better in same ongoing match i suppose.
-
- Posts: 782
- Joined: Tue Dec 01, 2009 11:10 am
Re: Quo Vadis Houdini, Stockfish, Komodo
Thank you ! This is quite intresting, and I will consider this new tournaments.
C.K.
C.K.
Nordlandia wrote:From Houdini manual:
The objectively highest level of play is achieved without contempt, i.e. Contempt value 0.
A contempt value of 2 will typically reduce the draw rate in a match by about 4%.
So for tournament matches against K and SF, C=0 is better choise against default.
H with C=0 might perform better in same ongoing match i suppose.