an amazing chart - where will it end ?
Houston: We have lift off ...
Moderators: hgm, Rebel, chrisw
-
- Posts: 4889
- Joined: Thu Mar 09, 2006 6:34 am
- Location: Pen Argyl, Pennsylvania
-
- Posts: 6340
- Joined: Mon Mar 13, 2006 2:34 pm
- Location: Acworth, GA
Re: Houston: We have lift off ...
Mike,
There's no need to fear, cause Underdog is here!
There's no need to fear, cause Underdog is here!
"Good decisions come from experience, and experience comes from bad decisions."
__________________________________________________________________
Ted Summers
__________________________________________________________________
Ted Summers
-
- Posts: 4889
- Joined: Thu Mar 09, 2006 6:34 am
- Location: Pen Argyl, Pennsylvania
-
- Posts: 12540
- Joined: Wed Mar 08, 2006 8:57 pm
- Location: Redmond, WA USA
Re: Houston: We have lift off ...
I see two cat 1 climbs and an HC.
Seems the downhill finish might put some of the sprinters back into it.
Seems the downhill finish might put some of the sprinters back into it.
Taking ideas is not a vice, it is a virtue. We have another word for this. It is called learning.
But sharing ideas is an even greater virtue. We have another word for this. It is called teaching.
But sharing ideas is an even greater virtue. We have another word for this. It is called teaching.
-
- Posts: 10948
- Joined: Wed Jul 26, 2006 10:21 pm
- Full name: Kai Laskos
Re: Houston: We have lift off ...
I don't know why you are so enthusiastic. Runs 20xxx and 30xxx are pretty pathetic, especially considering how much resources they have eaten up. Some folks there have overdone something. Just a quick check with the latest engine (rc4) and one of the latest nets:
TC: 60'' + 1''
So, run 30xxx is still ~150 Elo points below run 10xxx, and barely ~100 Elo points above 6x64 net 9155 (run 9xxx). Taking into account that the games with 6x64 net were 10-12 times faster and taking into account the hardware resources allocated, the whole run 9xxx could have been completed in less than a day. Lame runs, these newest ones. But I still hope that they will improve some 200 real Elo points over current level, although this is not granted at all.
TC: 60'' + 1''
Code: Select all
Rank Name Elo +/- Games Score Draws
SF8 120 68 60 66.7% 43.3%
1 lc0_v19_11261 0 111 20 50.0% 50.0%
2 lc0_v19_31214 -147 128 20 30.0% 40.0%
3 lc0_v19_9155 -241 127 20 20.0% 40.0%
Finished match
-
- Posts: 1142
- Joined: Thu Dec 28, 2017 4:06 pm
- Location: Argentina
Re: Houston: We have lift off ...
Remember that 30xxx nets haven't had considerable LR drops, yet.Laskos wrote: ↑Fri Nov 16, 2018 3:56 pm I don't know why you are so enthusiastic. Runs 20xxx and 30xxx are pretty pathetic, especially considering how much resources they have eaten up. Some folks there have overdone something. Just a quick check with the latest engine (rc4) and one of the latest nets:
TC: 60'' + 1''
So, run 30xxx is still ~150 Elo points below run 10xxx, and barely ~100 Elo points above 6x64 net 9155 (run 9xxx). Taking into account that the games with 6x64 net were 10-12 times faster and taking into account the hardware resources allocated, the whole run 9xxx could have been completed in less than a day. Lame runs, these newest ones. But I still hope that they will improve some 200 real Elo points over current level, although this is not granted at all.Code: Select all
Rank Name Elo +/- Games Score Draws SF8 120 68 60 66.7% 43.3% 1 lc0_v19_11261 0 111 20 50.0% 50.0% 2 lc0_v19_31214 -147 128 20 30.0% 40.0% 3 lc0_v19_9155 -241 127 20 20.0% 40.0% Finished match
Follow my tournament and some Leela gauntlets live at http://twitch.tv/ccls
-
- Posts: 4315
- Joined: Tue Apr 03, 2012 4:28 pm
Re: Houston: We have lift off ...
is that a fact? 6x64 nets are only 100 elo below the best of the larger nets?Laskos wrote: ↑Fri Nov 16, 2018 3:56 pm I don't know why you are so enthusiastic. Runs 20xxx and 30xxx are pretty pathetic, especially considering how much resources they have eaten up. Some folks there have overdone something. Just a quick check with the latest engine (rc4) and one of the latest nets:
TC: 60'' + 1''
So, run 30xxx is still ~150 Elo points below run 10xxx, and barely ~100 Elo points above 6x64 net 9155 (run 9xxx). Taking into account that the games with 6x64 net were 10-12 times faster and taking into account the hardware resources allocated, the whole run 9xxx could have been completed in less than a day. Lame runs, these newest ones. But I still hope that they will improve some 200 real Elo points over current level, although this is not granted at all.Code: Select all
Rank Name Elo +/- Games Score Draws SF8 120 68 60 66.7% 43.3% 1 lc0_v19_11261 0 111 20 50.0% 50.0% 2 lc0_v19_31214 -147 128 20 30.0% 40.0% 3 lc0_v19_9155 -241 127 20 20.0% 40.0% Finished match
-
- Posts: 10948
- Joined: Wed Jul 26, 2006 10:21 pm
- Full name: Kai Laskos
Re: Houston: We have lift off ...
No, 250 Elo points below 10xxx run with large 20x256 net. But these 20xxx and 30xxx runs with large nets run for months with only 100 Elo points better results than small net. 20xxx is IIRC already abandoned after several LR droppings, and I think that by now the computing effort is larger than DeepMind learning effort with their enormous hardware for A0 learning.chrisw wrote: ↑Fri Nov 16, 2018 5:54 pmis that a fact? 6x64 nets are only 100 elo below the best of the larger nets?Laskos wrote: ↑Fri Nov 16, 2018 3:56 pm I don't know why you are so enthusiastic. Runs 20xxx and 30xxx are pretty pathetic, especially considering how much resources they have eaten up. Some folks there have overdone something. Just a quick check with the latest engine (rc4) and one of the latest nets:
TC: 60'' + 1''
So, run 30xxx is still ~150 Elo points below run 10xxx, and barely ~100 Elo points above 6x64 net 9155 (run 9xxx). Taking into account that the games with 6x64 net were 10-12 times faster and taking into account the hardware resources allocated, the whole run 9xxx could have been completed in less than a day. Lame runs, these newest ones. But I still hope that they will improve some 200 real Elo points over current level, although this is not granted at all.Code: Select all
Rank Name Elo +/- Games Score Draws SF8 120 68 60 66.7% 43.3% 1 lc0_v19_11261 0 111 20 50.0% 50.0% 2 lc0_v19_31214 -147 128 20 30.0% 40.0% 3 lc0_v19_9155 -241 127 20 20.0% 40.0% Finished match
The start of this effort with CUDA engine was much more promissing, their initial runs achieving with small resources fast and remarkable results.
-
- Posts: 18748
- Joined: Thu Mar 09, 2006 6:40 pm
- Location: US of Europe, germany
- Full name: Thorsten Czub
Re: Houston: We have lift off ...
Its IMO unimportant. A race for elo. Quantifying instead of qualifying.
What seems like a fairy tale today may be reality tomorrow.
Here we have a fairy tale of the day after tomorrow....
Here we have a fairy tale of the day after tomorrow....
-
- Posts: 3186
- Joined: Sat Feb 16, 2008 7:38 am
- Full name: Peter Martan
Re: Houston: We have lift off ...
Don't want to be too sophisticated, Thorsten, but "switching from quantity to quality", something we know in German even better as Friedrich Engels Dialektik der Natur, is a principal way of AI too, isn't it?
Peter.