1.g4 opening is losing?

Discussion of anything and everything relating to chess playing software and machines.

Moderators: hgm, Rebel, chrisw

Hai
Posts: 598
Joined: Sun Aug 04, 2013 1:19 pm

Re: 1.g4 opening is losing?

Post by Hai »

fastgm wrote: Wed Feb 05, 2020 6:34 pm Here is a game, Stockfish 11 vs Stockfish 11, default settings, every move till depth 50, 1.g4 d5

[pgn][Event "Match - 1.g4 d5 - Stockfish 11 depth 50"]
[Site "FastGM"]
[Date "2020.01.22"]
[Round ""]
[White "Stockfish 11"]
[Black "Stockfish 11"]
[Result "0-1"]
[ECO "A00"]
[Opening "Grob's attack"]
[PlyCount "174"]
[TimeControl "inf"]

1. g4 {book} d5 {book} 2. g5 {-0.93/50 26812s} e5 {+1.68/50 23962s}
3. Bg2 {-1.00/50 12146s} Nc6 {+1.72/50 6973s} 4. d4 {-1.01/50 6076s}
exd4 {+1.60/50 2872s} 5. Nf3 {-1.09/50 7516s} Bc5 {+1.48/50 6526s}
6. Nbd2 {-0.93/50 6235s} Bb6 {+1.53/50 8610s} 7. Nb3 {-1.13/50 8374s}
Nge7 {+1.71/50 5848s} 8. a4 {-1.16/50 5853s} Na5 {+1.43/50 4947s}
9. Nfxd4 {-1.18/50 6581s} c5 {+1.34/50 5300s} 10. Nf3 {-1.20/50 6389s}
Nxb3 {+1.56/50 9386s} 11. cxb3 {-1.39/50 6856s} O-O {+1.68/50 9839s}
12. h4 {-1.46/50 6754s} Nc6 {+1.71/50 9540s} 13. h5 {-1.58/50 5159s}
Bg4 {+1.94/50 2612s} 14. Rh4 {-1.26/50 5800s} Qd7 {+1.85/50 4209s}
15. Nh2 {-1.37/50 7797s} Be6 {+2.12/50 5459s} 16. Bf4 {-1.60/50 11925s}
Rae8 {+2.01/50 10981s} 17. Kf1 {-1.61/50 4894s} Bd8 {+1.94/50 5155s}
18. Nf3 {-1.75/50 2569s} Bf5 {+2.28/50 16987s} 19. Kg1 {-1.79/50 8266s}
f6 {+2.08/50 4760s} 20. g6 {-1.96/50 5603s} hxg6 {+2.47/50 3769s}
21. hxg6 {-1.96/50 2189s} Bxg6 {+2.46/50 3628s} 22. Ne1 {-2.06/50 1266s}
Be4 {+2.84/50 2861s} 23. Bd6 {-1.92/50 665s} f5 {+3.04/50 2598s}
24. Bxf8 {-2.93/50 2629s} Bxh4 {+3.40/50 3118s} 25. Bxc5 {-3.21/50 2185s}
d4 {+3.40/50 2095s} 26. a5 {-3.23/50 1572s} Re6 {+3.79/50 2342s}
27. b4 {-3.43/50 595s} Rg6 {+3.96/50 1778s} 28. f3 {-3.08/50 2018s}
Bxe1 {+4.02/50 2011s} 29. fxe4 {-3.55/50 856s} fxe4 {+4.40/50 710s}
30. Qxe1 {-3.83/50 529s} Qg4 {+4.67/50 555s} 31. Qf1 {-3.89/50 277s}
Rf6 {+4.78/50 423s} 32. Qc1 {-4.35/50 1117s} Qg3 {+4.82/50 879s}
33. Ra3 {-3.88/50 1005s} e3 {+4.90/50 675s} 34. Rxe3 {-4.44/50 384s}
dxe3 {+4.84/50 382s} 35. Qxe3 {-4.62/50 292s} Qe1+ {+5.14/50 2626s}
36. Kh2 {-4.62/50 245s} Rh6+ {+5.57/50 3483s} 37. Bh3 {-4.62/50 371s}
Qh4 {+5.58/50 2195s} 38. Qb3+ {-4.73/50 572s} Kh8 {+5.58/50 266s}
39. Qf3 {-4.73/50 37s} Nd4 {+5.69/50 543s} 40. Bxd4 {-4.73/50 78s}
Qxd4 {+5.70/50 603s} 41. Qf8+ {-4.73/50 127s} Kh7 {+5.82/50 478s}
42. Qf5+ {-5.38/50 1909s} g6 {+5.99/50 1457s} 43. Qf7+ {-6.07/50 3975s}
Qg7 {+6.46/50 2030s} 44. Qf4 {-6.30/50 1708s} Qe7 {+6.58/50 365s}
45. Kg3 {-7.08/50 4676s} Rh5 {+6.58/50 85s} 46. Bg4 {-7.41/50 5499s}
Rb5 {+6.58/50 94s} 47. Qd2 {-7.61/50 3531s} Rxb4 {+7.36/50 2288s}
48. Bf3 {-7.70/50 3718s} Rb5 {+7.36/50 94s} 49. Kf2 {-8.51/50 14269s}
Qc5+ {+8.39/50 4964s} 50. Kf1 {-8.51/50 272s} Rxa5 {+9.64/50 13489s}
51. Qd7+ {-8.74/50 6257s} Kh6 {+10.79/50 17088s} 52. Qh3+ {-10.49/50 37164s}
Kg5 {+11.83/50 19151s} 53. Kg2 {-10.62/50 12291s} Qd4 {+15.51/50 70063s}
54. b3 {-18.75/50 279436s} Re5 {+19.25/50 53109s} 55. Qh7 {-19.81/50 84162s}
b5 {+50.69/50 84708s} 56. Qh1 {-47.55/50 94552s} a5 {+50.69/50 1999s}
57. Kg3 {-58.46/50 10153s} Re3 {+50.69/50 350s} 58. Kg2 {-58.78/50 775s}
a4 {+52.60/50 834s} 59. bxa4 {-147.92/50 4199s} bxa4 {+59.50/50 1035s}
60. Qb1 {-147.92/50 2966s} Re5 {+147.92/50 2239s} 61. Qc1+ {-M62/50 497s}
Kf6 {+M61/50 2010s} 62. Kf1 {-M58/50 308s} Kg7 {+M59/50 137s}
63. Qc7+ {-M54/50 130s} Kh6 {+M55/50 113s} 64. Qb8 {-M52/50 231s}
Qa1+ {+M53/50 176s} 65. Kf2 {-M50/50 20s} Rf5 {+M51/50 74s}
66. Qh2+ {-M48/50 34s} Kg7 {+M49/50 52s} 67. Qc7+ {-M46/50 79s}
Rf7 {+M47/50 50s} 68. Qc4 {-M44/50 59s} a3 {+M45/50 87s} 69. Kg2 {-M42/50 60s}
Qe5 {+M43/50 27s} 70. Qa2 {-M40/50 45s} Qg5+ {+M41/50 4.7s}
71. Kf2 {-M36/50 41s} Qc5+ {+M39/50 14s} 72. Kg2 {-M36/50 24s}
Rf5 {+M37/50 7.8s} 73. Qa1+ {-M34/50 9.5s} Kh7 {+M35/50 2.7s}
74. Qh1+ {-M32/50 5.6s} Kg8 {+M27/50 23s} 75. Kh3 {-M30/50 6.6s}
Qe3 {+M25/50 2.4s} 76. Qd1 {-M24/50 7.8s} Rh5+ {+M23/50 0.77s}
77. Kg2 {-M22/50 0.36s} Rg5+ {+M21/50 0.42s} 78. Kh3 {-M20/50 2.0s}
Qf4 {+M19/50 1.7s} 79. Qd8+ {-M18/50 0.22s} Kg7 {+M17/50 0.20s}
80. Qe7+ {-M16/50 0.22s} Kh6 {+M15/50 0.18s} 81. Qxg5+ {-M14/50 0.14s}
Qxg5 {+M13/50 0.26s} 82. Bd5 {-M12/50 0.24s} Qxd5 {+M11/50 0.26s}
83. e4 {-M10/50 0.41s} Qxe4 {+M9/50 0.48s} 84. Kg3 {-M8/50 0.12s}
a2 {+M7/50 0.12s} 85. Kf2 {-M6/50 0.010s} a1=Q {+M5/50 0.009s}
86. Kg3 {-M4/50 0.003s} Qg1+ {+M3/50 0.003s} 87. Kh3 {-M2/50 0.001s}
Qgg2# {+M1/50 0.003s, Black mates} 0-1[/pgn]
2.g5 is a blunder.
It's the third best move.
2. Bg2 is at least 0.15 better.
fastgm
Posts: 818
Joined: Mon Aug 19, 2013 6:57 pm

Re: 1.g4 opening is losing?

Post by fastgm »

Here another game with 10 cores and 16 GB Hash, Stockfish 11 vs Stockfish 11, contempt=0, each move till depth 50

[pgn][Event "Match - 1.g4 d5 - Stockfish 11 depth 50"]
[Site "FastGM"]
[Date "2020.02.03"]
[Round ""]
[White "Stockfish 11"]
[Black "Stockfish 11"]
[Result "0-1"]
[ECO "A00"]
[Opening "Grob's attack"]
[PlyCount "206"]
[TimeControl "inf"]

1. g4 {book} d5 {book} 2. e3 {-1.34/50 15148s} e5 {+1.29/50 7366s}
3. d4 {-1.44/50 12897s} exd4 {+1.46/50 3867s} 4. exd4 {-1.54/50 1454s}
Qe7+ {+1.47/50 2006s} 5. Be3 {-1.39/50 991s} Qe4 {+1.44/50 4122s}
6. Nf3 {-1.44/50 1805s} Bxg4 {+1.53/50 1443s} 7. Nbd2 {-1.38/50 1460s}
Qf5 {+1.53/50 1635s} 8. h3 {-1.47/50 4590s} Bh5 {+1.56/50 2761s}
9. Bd3 {-1.46/50 1770s} Qd7 {+1.40/50 2098s} 10. c3 {-1.63/50 1840s}
Nc6 {+1.57/50 1370s} 11. Qc2 {-1.53/50 4403s} Nge7 {+1.64/50 2539s}
12. O-O-O {-1.40/50 3467s} O-O-O {+1.58/50 3650s} 13. Rde1 {-1.63/50 3746s}
Bg6 {+1.48/50 967s} 14. Nb3 {-1.61/50 3513s} Bxd3 {+1.64/50 4183s}
15. Qxd3 {-1.53/50 1486s} Qf5 {+1.74/50 2149s} 16. Qd1 {-1.74/50 689s}
Ng6 {+1.66/50 1774s} 17. Reg1 {-1.65/50 1625s} Bd6 {+1.80/50 1626s}
18. Rg5 {-1.71/50 1322s} Qe6 {+1.57/50 1667s} 19. h4 {-1.62/50 3519s}
h5 {+1.69/50 5975s} 20. Ne1 {-1.76/50 3312s} Be7 {+1.70/50 2535s}
21. Rgg1 {-1.62/50 2155s} b6 {+1.69/50 5488s} 22. Bg5 {-1.76/50 3225s}
Bf6 {+1.53/50 4900s} 23. Kb1 {-1.55/50 2213s} Bxg5 {+1.83/50 1297s}
24. Rxg5 {-1.70/50 2184s} Nge7 {+1.69/50 1035s} 25. Nc2 {-1.72/50 253s}
g6 {+1.65/50 545s} 26. Ne3 {-1.95/50 451s} Ng8 {+1.72/50 290s}
27. Nc1 {-1.72/50 6060s} Nf6 {+1.71/50 84s} 28. Nd3 {-1.72/50 13s}
Ne4 {+1.96/50 2358s} 29. Rg2 {-1.72/50 4.5s} Rhe8 {+1.79/50 180s}
30. Re1 {-1.72/50 9.6s} Qf6 {+1.70/50 193s} 31. Rh2 {-1.72/50 299s}
Kb7 {+1.70/50 77s} 32. Rh3 {-1.72/50 40s} Ne7 {+1.69/50 73s}
33. a3 {-1.72/50 164s} c6 {+1.69/50 93s} 34. Ka2 {-1.72/50 43s}
Nd6 {+1.69/50 46s} 35. Ne5 {-1.72/50 128s} Nef5 {+1.72/50 624s}
36. Rf3 {-1.72/50 69s} Re6 {+1.72/50 81s} 37. Rf4 {-1.78/50 666s}
Nxe3 {+1.72/50 432s} 38. fxe3 {-1.78/50 142s} Qe7 {+1.72/50 7.0s}
39. Rg1 {-1.78/50 50s} Rf6 {+1.72/50 14s} 40. Rxf6 {-1.78/50 19s}
Qxf6 {+1.72/50 38s} 41. Rf1 {-1.78/50 39s} Qe6 {+1.72/50 78s}
42. Qf3 {-1.78/50 32s} Nf5 {+1.72/50 43s} 43. Qf4 {-1.78/50 44s}
Rc8 {+1.72/50 152s} 44. b3 {-1.78/50 42s} Re8 {+1.72/50 74s}
45. Rf2 {-1.78/50 90s} Re7 {+1.72/50 100s} 46. a4 {-1.78/50 65s}
Rc7 {+1.72/50 222s} 47. Kb2 {-1.90/50 1058s} Qe7 {+1.72/50 114s}
48. Qh2 {-2.02/50 996s} Qxh4 {+2.48/50 345s} 49. Qxh4 {-2.60/50 176s}
Nxh4 {+2.71/50 313s} 50. Nxf7 {-2.60/50 22s} Nf5 {+2.71/50 22s}
51. Ne5 {-2.60/50 57s} Nxe3 {+2.71/50 32s} 52. Rf3 {-2.60/50 17s}
Ng2 {+2.71/50 35s} 53. Nxg6 {-2.60/50 40s} h4 {+2.71/50 12s}
54. Nf8 {-2.60/50 37s} Re7 {+2.71/50 14s} 55. b4 {-2.60/50 18s}
Re2+ {+2.71/50 39s} 56. Kc1 {-2.60/50 14s} Nf4 {+2.71/50 8.6s}
57. Rxf4 {-2.60/50 2.4s} h3 {+2.71/50 0.46s} 58. Rf7+ {-2.60/50 14s}
Ka8 {+2.71/50 0.72s} 59. Rh7 {-2.60/50 3.0s} h2 {+2.71/50 4.7s}
60. Ng6 {-2.60/50 2.4s} Re1+ {+2.71/50 0.70s} 61. Kc2 {-2.60/50 1.5s}
h1=Q {+2.71/50 4.7s} 62. Rxh1 {-2.60/50 0.89s} Rxh1 {+2.71/50 0.38s}
63. Ne7 {-2.60/50 2.7s} Kb7 {+2.71/50 1.4s} 64. b5 {-2.60/50 0.29s}
cxb5 {+2.71/50 0.77s} 65. axb5 {-2.60/50 0.24s} Rh5 {+2.71/50 0.54s}
66. Ng6 {-2.60/50 0.89s} Kc7 {+2.71/50 0.25s} 67. Nf4 {-2.60/50 0.91s}
Rh2+ {+2.71/50 0.91s} 68. Kb3 {-7.09/50 18s} Kd6 {+2.71/50 0.19s}
69. Nd3 {-14.20/50 243s} Rh3 {+2.71/50 0.39s} 70. Nb4 {-16.50/50 195s}
Ke6 {+5.51/50 14s} 71. Nc6 {-66.18/50 1379s} Rh7 {+55.26/50 224s}
72. Nb4 {-147.92/50 350s} Rd7 {+147.92/50 77s} 73. Nd3 {-147.92/50 111s}
Kf5 {+147.92/50 55s} 74. Nb4 {-147.92/50 226s} Ke4 {+147.92/50 55s}
75. Nc6 {-147.92/50 34s} Ke3 {+147.92/50 94s} 76. Ne5 {-147.92/50 101s}
Rg7 {+147.92/50 128s} 77. Kb2 {-147.92/50 262s} Kd2 {+147.92/50 295s}
78. Nf3+ {-147.92/50 142s} Kd1 {+148.94/50 118s} 79. Ne5 {-148.95/50 176s}
Rg2+ {+148.96/50 37s} 80. Kb3 {-148.96/50 246s} Rg3 {+149.02/50 37s}
81. Nc6 {-149.02/50 87s} Kd2 {+149.03/50 12s} 82. Kb2 {-149.03/50 34s}
Rxc3 {+149.04/50 2.7s} 83. Ne7 {-149.04/50 27s} Rc4 {+M41/50 35s}
84. Nxd5 {-M40/50 23s} Rxd4 {+M39/50 0.022s} 85. Nc7 {-M38/50 0.056s}
Rb4+ {+M37/50 0.034s} 86. Ka3 {-M36/50 0.14s} Rc4 {+M35/50 0.036s}
87. Nd5 {-M34/50 0.073s} Rc5 {+M33/50 0.033s} 88. Nb4 {-M32/50 0.081s}
Rxb5 {+M31/50 0.031s} 89. Ka4 {-M30/50 1.5s} a6 {+M29/50 0.017s}
90. Nxa6 {-M28/50 0.063s} Ra5+ {+M27/50 0.039s} 91. Kb4 {-M26/50 0.28s}
Rxa6 {+M25/50 0.022s} 92. Kb5 {-M24/50 0.14s} Ra1 {+M23/50 0.038s}
93. Kc6 {-M22/50 0.17s} Rc1+ {+M21/50 0.35s} 94. Kb5 {-M20/50 0.081s}
Rc8 {+M19/50 0.050s} 95. Ka6 {-M18/50 0.084s} Rc4 {+M17/50 0.088s}
96. Kb7 {-M16/50 0.027s} Kc3 {+M15/50 0.050s} 97. Ka7 {-M14/50 0.068s}
Kb4 {+M13/50 0.083s} 98. Kxb6 {-M12/50 0.014s} Rc1 {+M11/50 0.017s}
99. Ka6 {-M10/50 0.011s} Kc5 {+M9/50 0.010s} 100. Kb7 {-M8/50 0.006s}
Kb5 {+M7/50 0.005s} 101. Ka7 {-M6/50 0.004s} Kc6 {+M5/50 0.004s}
102. Kb8 {-M4/50 0.003s} Ra1 {+M3/50 0.003s} 103. Kc8 {-M2/50 0.002s}
Ra8# {+M1/50 0.006s, Black mates} 0-1[/pgn]
Hai
Posts: 598
Joined: Sun Aug 04, 2013 1:19 pm

Re: 1.g4 opening is losing?

Post by Hai »

fastgm wrote: Wed Feb 05, 2020 9:37 pm Here another game with 10 cores and 16 GB Hash, Stockfish 11 vs Stockfish 11, contempt=0, each move till depth 50

[pgn][Event "Match - 1.g4 d5 - Stockfish 11 depth 50"]
[Site "FastGM"]
[Date "2020.02.03"]
[Round ""]
[White "Stockfish 11"]
[Black "Stockfish 11"]
[Result "0-1"]
[ECO "A00"]
[Opening "Grob's attack"]
[PlyCount "206"]
[TimeControl "inf"]

1. g4 {book} d5 {book} 2. e3 {-1.34/50 15148s} e5 {+1.29/50 7366s}
3. d4 {-1.44/50 12897s} exd4 {+1.46/50 3867s} 4. exd4 {-1.54/50 1454s}
Qe7+ {+1.47/50 2006s} 5. Be3 {-1.39/50 991s} Qe4 {+1.44/50 4122s}
6. Nf3 {-1.44/50 1805s} Bxg4 {+1.53/50 1443s} 7. Nbd2 {-1.38/50 1460s}
Qf5 {+1.53/50 1635s} 8. h3 {-1.47/50 4590s} Bh5 {+1.56/50 2761s}
9. Bd3 {-1.46/50 1770s} Qd7 {+1.40/50 2098s} 10. c3 {-1.63/50 1840s}
Nc6 {+1.57/50 1370s} 11. Qc2 {-1.53/50 4403s} Nge7 {+1.64/50 2539s}
12. O-O-O {-1.40/50 3467s} O-O-O {+1.58/50 3650s} 13. Rde1 {-1.63/50 3746s}
Bg6 {+1.48/50 967s} 14. Nb3 {-1.61/50 3513s} Bxd3 {+1.64/50 4183s}
15. Qxd3 {-1.53/50 1486s} Qf5 {+1.74/50 2149s} 16. Qd1 {-1.74/50 689s}
Ng6 {+1.66/50 1774s} 17. Reg1 {-1.65/50 1625s} Bd6 {+1.80/50 1626s}
18. Rg5 {-1.71/50 1322s} Qe6 {+1.57/50 1667s} 19. h4 {-1.62/50 3519s}
h5 {+1.69/50 5975s} 20. Ne1 {-1.76/50 3312s} Be7 {+1.70/50 2535s}
21. Rgg1 {-1.62/50 2155s} b6 {+1.69/50 5488s} 22. Bg5 {-1.76/50 3225s}
Bf6 {+1.53/50 4900s} 23. Kb1 {-1.55/50 2213s} Bxg5 {+1.83/50 1297s}
24. Rxg5 {-1.70/50 2184s} Nge7 {+1.69/50 1035s} 25. Nc2 {-1.72/50 253s}
g6 {+1.65/50 545s} 26. Ne3 {-1.95/50 451s} Ng8 {+1.72/50 290s}
27. Nc1 {-1.72/50 6060s} Nf6 {+1.71/50 84s} 28. Nd3 {-1.72/50 13s}
Ne4 {+1.96/50 2358s} 29. Rg2 {-1.72/50 4.5s} Rhe8 {+1.79/50 180s}
30. Re1 {-1.72/50 9.6s} Qf6 {+1.70/50 193s} 31. Rh2 {-1.72/50 299s}
Kb7 {+1.70/50 77s} 32. Rh3 {-1.72/50 40s} Ne7 {+1.69/50 73s}
33. a3 {-1.72/50 164s} c6 {+1.69/50 93s} 34. Ka2 {-1.72/50 43s}
Nd6 {+1.69/50 46s} 35. Ne5 {-1.72/50 128s} Nef5 {+1.72/50 624s}
36. Rf3 {-1.72/50 69s} Re6 {+1.72/50 81s} 37. Rf4 {-1.78/50 666s}
Nxe3 {+1.72/50 432s} 38. fxe3 {-1.78/50 142s} Qe7 {+1.72/50 7.0s}
39. Rg1 {-1.78/50 50s} Rf6 {+1.72/50 14s} 40. Rxf6 {-1.78/50 19s}
Qxf6 {+1.72/50 38s} 41. Rf1 {-1.78/50 39s} Qe6 {+1.72/50 78s}
42. Qf3 {-1.78/50 32s} Nf5 {+1.72/50 43s} 43. Qf4 {-1.78/50 44s}
Rc8 {+1.72/50 152s} 44. b3 {-1.78/50 42s} Re8 {+1.72/50 74s}
45. Rf2 {-1.78/50 90s} Re7 {+1.72/50 100s} 46. a4 {-1.78/50 65s}
Rc7 {+1.72/50 222s} 47. Kb2 {-1.90/50 1058s} Qe7 {+1.72/50 114s}
48. Qh2 {-2.02/50 996s} Qxh4 {+2.48/50 345s} 49. Qxh4 {-2.60/50 176s}
Nxh4 {+2.71/50 313s} 50. Nxf7 {-2.60/50 22s} Nf5 {+2.71/50 22s}
51. Ne5 {-2.60/50 57s} Nxe3 {+2.71/50 32s} 52. Rf3 {-2.60/50 17s}
Ng2 {+2.71/50 35s} 53. Nxg6 {-2.60/50 40s} h4 {+2.71/50 12s}
54. Nf8 {-2.60/50 37s} Re7 {+2.71/50 14s} 55. b4 {-2.60/50 18s}
Re2+ {+2.71/50 39s} 56. Kc1 {-2.60/50 14s} Nf4 {+2.71/50 8.6s}
57. Rxf4 {-2.60/50 2.4s} h3 {+2.71/50 0.46s} 58. Rf7+ {-2.60/50 14s}
Ka8 {+2.71/50 0.72s} 59. Rh7 {-2.60/50 3.0s} h2 {+2.71/50 4.7s}
60. Ng6 {-2.60/50 2.4s} Re1+ {+2.71/50 0.70s} 61. Kc2 {-2.60/50 1.5s}
h1=Q {+2.71/50 4.7s} 62. Rxh1 {-2.60/50 0.89s} Rxh1 {+2.71/50 0.38s}
63. Ne7 {-2.60/50 2.7s} Kb7 {+2.71/50 1.4s} 64. b5 {-2.60/50 0.29s}
cxb5 {+2.71/50 0.77s} 65. axb5 {-2.60/50 0.24s} Rh5 {+2.71/50 0.54s}
66. Ng6 {-2.60/50 0.89s} Kc7 {+2.71/50 0.25s} 67. Nf4 {-2.60/50 0.91s}
Rh2+ {+2.71/50 0.91s} 68. Kb3 {-7.09/50 18s} Kd6 {+2.71/50 0.19s}
69. Nd3 {-14.20/50 243s} Rh3 {+2.71/50 0.39s} 70. Nb4 {-16.50/50 195s}
Ke6 {+5.51/50 14s} 71. Nc6 {-66.18/50 1379s} Rh7 {+55.26/50 224s}
72. Nb4 {-147.92/50 350s} Rd7 {+147.92/50 77s} 73. Nd3 {-147.92/50 111s}
Kf5 {+147.92/50 55s} 74. Nb4 {-147.92/50 226s} Ke4 {+147.92/50 55s}
75. Nc6 {-147.92/50 34s} Ke3 {+147.92/50 94s} 76. Ne5 {-147.92/50 101s}
Rg7 {+147.92/50 128s} 77. Kb2 {-147.92/50 262s} Kd2 {+147.92/50 295s}
78. Nf3+ {-147.92/50 142s} Kd1 {+148.94/50 118s} 79. Ne5 {-148.95/50 176s}
Rg2+ {+148.96/50 37s} 80. Kb3 {-148.96/50 246s} Rg3 {+149.02/50 37s}
81. Nc6 {-149.02/50 87s} Kd2 {+149.03/50 12s} 82. Kb2 {-149.03/50 34s}
Rxc3 {+149.04/50 2.7s} 83. Ne7 {-149.04/50 27s} Rc4 {+M41/50 35s}
84. Nxd5 {-M40/50 23s} Rxd4 {+M39/50 0.022s} 85. Nc7 {-M38/50 0.056s}
Rb4+ {+M37/50 0.034s} 86. Ka3 {-M36/50 0.14s} Rc4 {+M35/50 0.036s}
87. Nd5 {-M34/50 0.073s} Rc5 {+M33/50 0.033s} 88. Nb4 {-M32/50 0.081s}
Rxb5 {+M31/50 0.031s} 89. Ka4 {-M30/50 1.5s} a6 {+M29/50 0.017s}
90. Nxa6 {-M28/50 0.063s} Ra5+ {+M27/50 0.039s} 91. Kb4 {-M26/50 0.28s}
Rxa6 {+M25/50 0.022s} 92. Kb5 {-M24/50 0.14s} Ra1 {+M23/50 0.038s}
93. Kc6 {-M22/50 0.17s} Rc1+ {+M21/50 0.35s} 94. Kb5 {-M20/50 0.081s}
Rc8 {+M19/50 0.050s} 95. Ka6 {-M18/50 0.084s} Rc4 {+M17/50 0.088s}
96. Kb7 {-M16/50 0.027s} Kc3 {+M15/50 0.050s} 97. Ka7 {-M14/50 0.068s}
Kb4 {+M13/50 0.083s} 98. Kxb6 {-M12/50 0.014s} Rc1 {+M11/50 0.017s}
99. Ka6 {-M10/50 0.011s} Kc5 {+M9/50 0.010s} 100. Kb7 {-M8/50 0.006s}
Kb5 {+M7/50 0.005s} 101. Ka7 {-M6/50 0.004s} Kc6 {+M5/50 0.004s}
102. Kb8 {-M4/50 0.003s} Ra1 {+M3/50 0.003s} 103. Kc8 {-M2/50 0.002s}
Ra8# {+M1/50 0.006s, Black mates} 0-1[/pgn]
2.e3 is the fourth best move.
2.Bg2 is at least 0.27 better for black.
zullil
Posts: 6442
Joined: Tue Jan 09, 2007 12:31 am
Location: PA USA
Full name: Louis Zulli

Re: 1.g4 opening is losing?

Post by zullil »

Hai wrote: Wed Feb 05, 2020 10:44 pm
2.e3 is the fourth best move.
2.Bg2 is at least 0.27 better for black.
It seems silly to me to assert that a certain move is best. According to what/whom?

My guess is that all these moves are equally good; they all draw with perfect play. What exactly does "best" even mean?
Alayan
Posts: 550
Joined: Tue Nov 19, 2019 8:48 pm
Full name: Alayan Feh

Re: 1.g4 opening is losing?

Post by Alayan »

Hai wrote: Wed Feb 05, 2020 10:44 pm 2.e3 is the fourth best move.
2.Bg2 is at least 0.27 better for black.
You don't know this.
User avatar
Graham Banks
Posts: 41415
Joined: Sun Feb 26, 2006 10:52 am
Location: Auckland, NZ

Re: 1.g4 opening is losing?

Post by Graham Banks »

zullil wrote: Wed Feb 05, 2020 10:50 pm
Hai wrote: Wed Feb 05, 2020 10:44 pm
2.e3 is the fourth best move.
2.Bg2 is at least 0.27 better for black.
It seems silly to me to assert that a certain move is best. According to what/whom?

My guess is that all these moves are equally good; they all draw with perfect play. What exactly does "best" even mean?
1.g4 is a lost move for white in my opinion. No draw with perfect play.
gbanksnz at gmail.com
User avatar
Ovyron
Posts: 4556
Joined: Tue Jul 03, 2007 4:30 am

Re: 1.g4 opening is losing?

Post by Ovyron »

You can make any 2nd move by white better than the others by just pounding the others' scores until they're worse.
Graham Banks wrote: Wed Feb 05, 2020 10:53 pm1.g4 is a lost move for white in my opinion. No draw with perfect play.
After 4 months of analyzing these positions I'm about to be converted to that opinion.
zullil
Posts: 6442
Joined: Tue Jan 09, 2007 12:31 am
Location: PA USA
Full name: Louis Zulli

Re: 1.g4 opening is losing?

Post by zullil »

Graham Banks wrote: Wed Feb 05, 2020 10:53 pm
zullil wrote: Wed Feb 05, 2020 10:50 pm
Hai wrote: Wed Feb 05, 2020 10:44 pm
2.e3 is the fourth best move.
2.Bg2 is at least 0.27 better for black.
It seems silly to me to assert that a certain move is best. According to what/whom?

My guess is that all these moves are equally good; they all draw with perfect play. What exactly does "best" even mean?
1.g4 is a lost move for white in my opinion. No draw with perfect play.
I don't think either of us will know for sure. At least, not in this life. :D
Spliffjiffer
Posts: 416
Joined: Thu Aug 02, 2012 7:48 pm
Location: Germany

Re: 1.g4 opening is losing?

Post by Spliffjiffer »

every single seconds we are obsessed with the determinism of the evaluation of our days...is it so difficult to understand that a 200 elo more efficient partner will beat the devil out of you when u trust on an entity that is currently unbeatable ?...what is it about to be much better than you... does this make any sense to u noobs ??...are such deterministic people able to get a truth at all in our current world of explanations ?...get rdy for the new explanation imo,...determinism was ardy yesterday peers !
Wahrheiten sind Illusionen von denen wir aber vergessen haben dass sie welche sind.
mmt
Posts: 343
Joined: Sun Aug 25, 2019 8:33 am
Full name: .

Re: 1.g4 opening is losing?

Post by mmt »

Too many possibilities to prove it but what could be feasible is to test all white responses within let's say 0.2 pawns off the main SF and LC0 line (more lines closer to the root) down to >3.0 eval at decent time controls. This would pretty strongly suggest that it's lost. You could start at just 0.1 and 2.0 and make it a distributed project. Same with some other opening lines. You could also try to get an actual estimate of the likelihood that 1. g4 is lost with perfect play but that's for another post.