Is the Latvian losing?

Discussion of anything and everything relating to chess playing software and machines.

Moderators: hgm, Rebel, chrisw

Werewolf
Posts: 1796
Joined: Thu Sep 18, 2008 10:24 pm

Re: Is the Latvian losing?

Post by Werewolf »

agnolauga wrote: Thu May 28, 2020 12:43 pm
Werewolf wrote: Thu May 28, 2020 11:41 am
agnolauga wrote: Wed May 27, 2020 8:32 pm
Werewolf wrote: Wed May 27, 2020 6:41 pm
agnolauga wrote: Wed May 27, 2020 2:26 pm
Werewolf wrote: Wed May 27, 2020 9:03 am
agnolauga wrote: Tue May 26, 2020 8:50 pm
Werewolf wrote: Tue May 26, 2020 7:49 pm11...Qd7
12.Bd2
12...Qd4
13. O-O-O
13...Nbd7
14. Nf5
14...Bf5

If 15. Qf5 then I'll play 15...o-o-o

If 15. Re1+ then I'll play 15...Be4
15. Qf5 - O-O-O
16. g3
16...Qg4
agnolauga
Posts: 15
Joined: Tue Jan 15, 2019 10:55 pm
Full name: Jose Moreira

Re: Is the Latvian losing?

Post by agnolauga »

17. Bh3
Werewolf
Posts: 1796
Joined: Thu Sep 18, 2008 10:24 pm

Re: Is the Latvian losing?

Post by Werewolf »

17...Qf5 and if 18.Bf5 then 18...Re8
the_real_greco
Posts: 70
Joined: Thu Sep 19, 2019 5:55 am
Full name: Andy!

Re: Is the Latvian losing?

Post by the_real_greco »

The Greco Countergambit, you mean?
Also, there's this historical gem: https://www.chessgames.com/perl/chessgame?gid=1044024
agnolauga
Posts: 15
Joined: Tue Jan 15, 2019 10:55 pm
Full name: Jose Moreira

Re: Is the Latvian losing?

Post by agnolauga »

Werewolf wrote: Thu May 28, 2020 6:23 pm 17...Qf5 and if 18.Bf5 then 18...Re8
19. h4
User avatar
Graham Banks
Posts: 41423
Joined: Sun Feb 26, 2006 10:52 am
Location: Auckland, NZ

Re: Is the Latvian losing?

Post by Graham Banks »

agnolauga wrote: Thu May 28, 2020 10:12 pm
Werewolf wrote: Thu May 28, 2020 6:23 pm 17...Qf5 and if 18.Bf5 then 18...Re8
19. h4
Board position would be good. :wink:
gbanksnz at gmail.com
Werewolf
Posts: 1796
Joined: Thu Sep 18, 2008 10:24 pm

Re: Is the Latvian losing?

Post by Werewolf »

[d]2k1rb1r/pp1n2pp/2p2n2/5B2/7P/2N3P1/PPPB4/2KR3R b - - 0 19

Black (me) to play:


1. e4 e5 2. Nf3 f5 3. Nxe5 Qf6 4. Nc4 fxe4 5. Nc3 Qf7 6. Ne3 d5 7. Nexd5 c6 8.
Ne3 Nf6 9. f3 exf3 10. Qxf3 Be6 11. d4 Qd7 12. Bd2 Qxd4 13. O-O-O Nbd7 14. Nf5
Bxf5 15. Qxf5 O-O-O 16. g3 Qg4 17. Bh3 Qxf5 18. Bxf5 Re8 19. h4
Werewolf
Posts: 1796
Joined: Thu Sep 18, 2008 10:24 pm

Re: Is the Latvian losing?

Post by Werewolf »

19...Bd6
IanO
Posts: 496
Joined: Wed Mar 08, 2006 9:45 pm
Location: Portland, OR

Re: Is the Latvian losing?

Post by IanO »

the_real_greco wrote: Thu May 28, 2020 9:14 pm Also, there's this historical gem: https://www.chessgames.com/perl/chessgame?gid=1044024
Fischer-Pupols is a rough gem, indeed. A teenage future master beats up the 12-year-old future world champ! There are many unpublished picturesque mates and faster attacks on the sidelines, well worth analyzing.
fastgm
Posts: 818
Joined: Mon Aug 19, 2013 6:57 pm

Re: Is the Latvian losing?

Post by fastgm »

1. e4 e5 2. Nf3 f5 3. Nxe5
Stockfish 200521 vs Stockfish 200521 - Every move to depth 50

[pgn][Event "SF200521-SF200521 D50"]
[Site "?"]
[Date "2020.05.29"]
[Round "1"]
[White "Stockfish 200521"]
[Black "Stockfish 200521"]
[Result "1-0"]
[ECO "C40"]
[PlyCount "111"]
[EventDate "2020.??.??"]

{[%evp 0,111,16,28,38,44,123,114,112,108,154,135,135,135,136,69,71,62,75,64,77,
86,96,96,120,94,126,66,71,66,133,131,131,129,133,93,100,124,124,98,155,130,160,
118,225,171,209,199,235,200,211,149,162,152,163,163,169,153,182,175,168,167,
187,191,179,169,177,184,200,179,213,202,210,192,189,177,178,188,172,165,209,
200,195,179,207,191,209,196,193,209,216,214,226,253,244,281,310,303,303,300,
310,310,322,312,327,317,342,336,362,346,347,347,355,347]} 1. e4 {book} e5 {book
} 2. Nf3 {book} f5 {book} 3. Nxe5 {book} Qf6 {[%eval -173,50] 292s} 4. d4 {
[%eval 197,50] 225s} d6 {[%eval -185,50] 148s} 5. Nc4 {[%eval 195,50] 63s} fxe4
{[%eval -177,50] 113s} 6. Nc3 {[%eval 204,50] 197s} Qg6 {[%eval -188,50] 113s}
7. Ne3 {[%eval 203,50] 120s} Nf6 {[%eval -191,50] [%emt 0:00:57]} 8. Be2 {
[%eval 205,50] 87s} c6 {[%eval -173,50] 112s} 9. O-O {[%eval 215,50] 191s} Be7
{[%eval -179,50] 81s} 10. f3 {[%eval 218,50] [%emt 0:00:46]} O-O {[%eval -198,
50] 91s} 11. fxe4 {[%eval 213,50] 69s} Nxe4 {[%eval -200,50] [%emt 0:00:48]}
12. Bd3 {[%eval 203,50] 113s} Rxf1+ {[%eval -200,50] 118s} 13. Qxf1 {[%eval
187,50] 196s} d5 {[%eval -200,50] [%emt 0:00:45]} 14. Qf3 {[%eval 207,50] 116s}
Be6 {[%eval -200,50] 72s} 15. Nxe4 {[%eval 209,50] 185s} dxe4 {[%eval -218,50]
443s} 16. Bxe4 {[%eval 199,50] 70s} Qf6 {[%eval -219,50] 608s} 17. Nf5 {
[%eval 213,50] 195s} Nd7 {[%eval -217,50] 214s} 18. Nxe7+ {[%eval 200,50] 547s}
Qxe7 {[%eval -205,50] 576s} 19. Bd3 {[%eval 219,50] 237s} a6 {[%eval -220,50]
1609s} 20. Bf4 {[%eval 208,50] 293s} Qf6 {[%eval -234,50] 390s} 21. Qe4 {
[%eval 233,50] 96s} Nf8 {[%eval -253,50] 356s} 22. Rf1 {[%eval 254,50] 364s}
Qe7 {[%eval -244,50] 277s} 23. b3 {[%eval 256,50] 366s} Qd7 {[%eval -230,50]
116s} 24. c3 {[%eval 265,50] 442s} Ng6 {[%eval -271,50] 759s} 25. Bg3 {[%eval
275,50] 420s} Re8 {[%eval -254,50] 62s} 26. Qf3 {[%eval 285,50] 375s} Bd5 {
[%eval -278,50] 366s} 27. Qf2 {[%eval 282,50] 289s} Rf8 {[%eval -279,50] 319s}
28. Qe3 {[%eval 283,50] 208s} Re8 {[%eval -272,50] 452s} 29. Qd2 {[%eval 293,
50] 193s} Be4 {[%eval -295,50] 756s} 30. Be2 {[%eval 277,50] 114s} Qd8 {
[%eval -296,50] [%emt 0:00:55]} 31. Re1 {[%eval 296,50] 165s} Bd5 {[%eval -286,
50] [%emt 0:00:21]} 32. h3 {[%eval 281,50] 204s} Bf7 {[%eval -286,50] [%emt 0:
00:21]} 33. Rf1 {[%eval 281,50] [%emt 0:00:21]} Nf8 {[%eval -296,50] 194s} 34.
Bd3 {[%eval 281,50] [%emt 0:00:58]} Be6 {[%eval -306,50] 513s} 35. Re1 {
[%eval 315,50] 541s} Ng6 {[%eval -321,50] 79s} 36. Bc2 {[%eval 315,50] 8.7s}
Bf7 {[%eval -333,50] 311s} 37. Rxe8+ {[%eval 315,50] 1.5s} Qxe8 {[%eval -332,
50] [%emt 0:00:25]} 38. c4 {[%eval 325,50] 106s} Qd7 {[%eval -333,50] 72s} 39.
Be4 {[%eval 370,50] 148s} Nf8 {[%eval -333,50] 8.7s} 40. Bf3 {[%eval 419,50]
398s} Qe8 {[%eval -385,50] 184s} 41. Qd1 {[%eval 424,50] 194s} Nd7 {[%eval
-390,50] [%emt 0:00:51]} 42. d5 {[%eval 482,50] 118s} Nf6 {[%eval -390,50] 3.4s
} 43. dxc6 {[%eval 482,50] 3.7s} bxc6 {[%eval -644,50] 1957s} 44. Qe1 {[%eval
461,50] 2.3s} Qd8 {[%eval -650,50] 314s} 45. Qe3 {[%eval 518,50] [%emt 0:00:34]
} Qc8 {[%eval -661,50] 174s} 46. Qe7 {[%eval 722,50] 1415s} h6 {[%eval -789,50]
5072s} 47. Be5 {[%eval 796,50] 2186s} Nh7 {[%eval -837,50] 3869s} 48. Qc5 {
[%eval 861,50] 2874s} Ng5 {[%eval -854,50] 2553s} 49. Bxc6 {[%eval 888,50]
1093s} Ne4 {[%eval -864,50] 1407s} 50. Qb6 {[%eval 933,50] 2790s} Qf5 {[%eval
-882,50] 1120s} 51. Qc7 {[%eval 958,50] 2384s} Kh7 {[%eval -916,50] 1738s} 52.
Bd4 {[%eval 1009,50] 5856s} Ng5 {[%eval -966,50] 2094s} 53. Qe5 {[%eval 1010,
50] 3841s} Qg6 {[%eval -1018,50] 3188s} 54. Kh2 {[%eval 1106,50] 2269s} Be6 {
[%eval -1147,50] 6759s} 55. c5 {[%eval 1239,50] 7388s} Nf7 {[%eval -1340,50]
19454s} 56. Qf4 {[%eval -1402,50] 5832s} 1-0[/pgn]