Test conditions:
-TC=4'+2"
-Hash=256 MB
-GUI: Fritz 17 x64
-Books: Fritz17.ctg for both engines
-default settings for both engines
-1 thread-CPU=Intel i5-7400-3GHz (Kaby Lake)
-OS: Windows 10 Home
-TBS: 6-men Syzygy bases linked to Fritz17 GUI.
Deep Sjeng c't 2010 has 2926 Elo points (CCRL Blitz).
Expected rating for Seer 1.2.1_x64_skylake is around 3004 Elo points (CCRL Blitz). +145 Elo points face to Seer 1.1_x64_skylake.
Seer 1.1 x64 has 2859 Elo points (CCRL Blitz).
Congratulations !
My test for Seer 1.2.1_x64_skylake
Moderators: hgm, Rebel, chrisw
-
- Posts: 4466
- Joined: Fri Apr 21, 2006 4:19 pm
- Location: IASI - the historical capital of MOLDOVA
- Full name: SilvianR
-
- Posts: 530
- Joined: Sun Sep 06, 2020 4:40 am
- Full name: Connor McMonigle
Re: My test for Seer 1.2.1_x64_skylake
That's fantastic news. It would seem I succeeded in finally surpassing Deep Sjeng. Some other testers are reporting somewhat higher elo for 1.2.1 so it's possible Deep Sjeng might just be a tough nut to crack for Seer . As always, thanks for testing! The next release will hopefully be substantially faster.
-
- Posts: 4466
- Joined: Fri Apr 21, 2006 4:19 pm
- Location: IASI - the historical capital of MOLDOVA
- Full name: SilvianR
Re: My test for Seer 1.2.1_x64_skylake
1.-YES ! Congratulations, again !connor_mcmonigle wrote: ↑Fri Nov 20, 2020 9:46 pm 1.- It would seem I succeeded in finally surpassing Deep Sjeng.
2.-it's possible Deep Sjeng might just be a tough nut to crack for Seer .
2.-Deep Sjeng c't 2010 is my favourite engine on 32-bit. Very balanced.
Next week I'll post here my test (in the same conditions) for the buggy Seer 1.2 version. I don't know why..... but seems stronger.
-
- Posts: 530
- Joined: Sun Sep 06, 2020 4:40 am
- Full name: Connor McMonigle
Re: My test for Seer 1.2.1_x64_skylake
Hmm. I would blame it on small sample size If you add the results from this match to your 1.2 match, you'll probably end up with even better estimate of 1.2.1's strength as the only change with 1.2.1 is the ability to find the shortest path to mate. The circumstances under which 1.2 wouldn't mate the opponent were rare anyways. In testing, the improvement gained only ~5 elo over thousands of games.Sylwy wrote: ↑Fri Nov 20, 2020 10:08 pm1.-YES ! Congratulations, again !connor_mcmonigle wrote: ↑Fri Nov 20, 2020 9:46 pm 1.- It would seem I succeeded in finally surpassing Deep Sjeng.
2.-it's possible Deep Sjeng might just be a tough nut to crack for Seer .
2.-Deep Sjeng c't 2010 is my favourite engine on 32-bit. Very balanced.
Next week I'll post here my test (in the same conditions) for the buggy Seer 1.2 version. I don't know why..... but seems stronger.
-
- Posts: 95
- Joined: Wed Mar 28, 2018 10:16 am
Re: My test for Seer 1.2.1_x64_skylake
Hallo Connor
have included our engine in tournament with a lot of opponents
results will come next week
http://computer-chess.org/doku.php?id=c ... ments:face
Best Gerhard
have included our engine in tournament with a lot of opponents
results will come next week
http://computer-chess.org/doku.php?id=c ... ments:face
Best Gerhard
http://faceblitz.feste-ip.net:56132 (server sometimes sleeps - try later )
-
- Posts: 530
- Joined: Sun Sep 06, 2020 4:40 am
- Full name: Connor McMonigle
Re: My test for Seer 1.2.1_x64_skylake
Thanks!gerhard wrote: ↑Sat Nov 21, 2020 12:13 pm Hallo Connor
have included our engine in tournament with a lot of opponents
results will come next week
http://computer-chess.org/doku.php?id=c ... ments:face
Best Gerhard
-
- Posts: 4466
- Joined: Fri Apr 21, 2006 4:19 pm
- Location: IASI - the historical capital of MOLDOVA
- Full name: SilvianR
-
- Posts: 530
- Joined: Sun Sep 06, 2020 4:40 am
- Full name: Connor McMonigle