Fat Fritz 2

Discussion of anything and everything relating to chess playing software and machines.

Moderators: hgm, Rebel, chrisw

User avatar
jshriver
Posts: 1342
Joined: Wed Mar 08, 2006 9:41 pm
Location: Morgantown, WV, USA

Re: Fat Fritz 2

Post by jshriver »

nio wrote: Sat Feb 13, 2021 1:46 pm So is the download source now exactly the same as the paid one?
The source for the engine should be the same as the paid one, but as mentioned in an earlier post its suggested that the NN that was recently released is an older weaker version compared to the commercial one.
nio
Posts: 6
Joined: Sun Jan 17, 2021 7:27 pm
Full name: Adi Fischet

Re: Fat Fritz 2

Post by nio »

Thanks. Even the one released 2 days ago?
Is that ok with the stockfish lizense?
Gabor Szots
Posts: 1362
Joined: Sat Jul 21, 2018 7:43 am
Location: Szentendre, Hungary
Full name: Gabor Szots

Re: Fat Fritz 2

Post by Gabor Szots »

pohl4711 wrote: Sat Feb 13, 2021 11:45 amI looked into both nets with a HEX-editor and they are definitly different!
How did you do that? The official release has no separate net, it's embedded.
Gabor Szots
CCRL testing group
User avatar
AdminX
Posts: 6339
Joined: Mon Mar 13, 2006 2:34 pm
Location: Acworth, GA

Re: Fat Fritz 2

Post by AdminX »

jshriver wrote: Sat Feb 13, 2021 1:59 pm
nio wrote: Sat Feb 13, 2021 1:46 pm So is the download source now exactly the same as the paid one?
The source for the engine should be the same as the paid one, but as mentioned in an earlier post its suggested that the NN that was recently released is an older weaker version compared to the commercial one.
I have a feeling that sales for FF2 will be dismal, and I wonder if they will break even after marketing cost. :roll:
"Good decisions come from experience, and experience comes from bad decisions."
__________________________________________________________________
Ted Summers
Modern Times
Posts: 3546
Joined: Thu Jun 07, 2012 11:02 pm

Re: Fat Fritz 2

Post by Modern Times »

AdminX wrote: Sat Feb 13, 2021 2:05 pm I have a feeling that sales for FF2 will be dismal, and I wonder if they will break even after marketing cost. :roll:
I agree, although the Fritz brand does have some loyalty. Impossible to know.
User avatar
Graham Banks
Posts: 41416
Joined: Sun Feb 26, 2006 10:52 am
Location: Auckland, NZ

Re: Fat Fritz 2

Post by Graham Banks »

Sylwy wrote: Sat Feb 13, 2021 12:04 pm :lol: This means that CCRL also tested an old version of the 20x512 net! :lol:

Image

FatFritz 2 x64.................3634 (493 games)
Stockfish 12 x64..............3631 (2699 games)
No. We tested the official release version.
gbanksnz at gmail.com
User avatar
Sylwy
Posts: 4465
Joined: Fri Apr 21, 2006 4:19 pm
Location: IASI - the historical capital of MOLDOVA
Full name: SilvianR

Re: Fat Fritz 2

Post by Sylwy »

Graham Banks wrote: Sat Feb 13, 2021 3:21 pm
Sylwy wrote: Sat Feb 13, 2021 12:04 pm :lol: This means that CCRL also tested an old version of the 20x512 net! :lol:

Image

FatFritz 2 x64.................3634 (493 games)
Stockfish 12 x64..............3631 (2699 games)
No. We tested the official release version.
Thanks ! This means that the net in the archive uploaded by Mr. Michael Taktikos is the correct one. My test is evolving similarly to the version tested by CCRL.
nio
Posts: 6
Joined: Sun Jan 17, 2021 7:27 pm
Full name: Adi Fischet

Re: Fat Fritz 2

Post by nio »

MTaktikos wrote: Sat Feb 13, 2021 11:26 am
jshriver wrote: Sat Feb 13, 2021 10:35 am I cloned the code base when this was post and able to compiled under Linux. Actually now I think about it you have a point. Because even if you can compile it, its useless unless you have the weights file
In the meantime, the github link of DanielUranga includes also the weights file.
Although I doubt it is the same weights file offered by Chessbase, I compiled the published code from github and it works:
https://filehorst.de/d/dBDCEnDj
Hi, thanks: Whats the difference between FatFritz2.exe and FatFritz2mycompile.exe.
Whats the version of the included FatFritz2_v1.bin? Is it official or the one from github that some say is older version?

thanks
User avatar
pohl4711
Posts: 2433
Joined: Sat Sep 03, 2011 7:25 am
Location: Berlin, Germany
Full name: Stefan Pohl

Re: Fat Fritz 2

Post by pohl4711 »

Gabor Szots wrote: Sat Feb 13, 2021 2:04 pm
pohl4711 wrote: Sat Feb 13, 2021 11:45 amI looked into both nets with a HEX-editor and they are definitly different!
How did you do that? The official release has no separate net, it's embedded.
There is an updated version of FF2 (called update1) (source code on github), where the net is a separate file. Because the first release with the nnue-net being part of the binaries was a gpl license violation.
This updated version of FF2 can use the commercial net or the weaker net from the github site of FF2.
Last edited by pohl4711 on Sat Feb 13, 2021 4:37 pm, edited 2 times in total.
User avatar
pohl4711
Posts: 2433
Joined: Sat Sep 03, 2011 7:25 am
Location: Berlin, Germany
Full name: Stefan Pohl

Re: Fat Fritz 2

Post by pohl4711 »

Sylwy wrote: Sat Feb 13, 2021 3:41 pm
Graham Banks wrote: Sat Feb 13, 2021 3:21 pm
Sylwy wrote: Sat Feb 13, 2021 12:04 pm :lol: This means that CCRL also tested an old version of the 20x512 net! :lol:

Image

FatFritz 2 x64.................3634 (493 games)
Stockfish 12 x64..............3631 (2699 games)
No. We tested the official release version.
Thanks ! This means that the net in the archive uploaded by Mr. Michael Taktikos is the correct one. My test is evolving similarly to the version tested by CCRL.
No. Only the commercial version of FF2 has the strong FF2 net. The ratinglists (CEGT, CCRL and me (SPCC)) got this version for testing. The net, which can be downloaded on the FF2-github website is weaker. Of course. Otherwise nobody would buy FF2 anymore.