Guenther wrote: ↑Mon Feb 22, 2021 7:16 pm
towforce wrote: ↑Mon Feb 22, 2021 3:58 pm
pohl4711 wrote: ↑Mon Feb 22, 2021 2:50 pmTotally wrong Imagination. I always paid for the commercial engines in my ratinglist. Only exception was Fat Fritz 2, I got a free testversion from Albert Silver. But otherwise, I would have bought it, because I think the concept of the Fat Fritz 2 net is interesting.
I bought Houdini from version 2 on. And I am a Komodo Subscriber since years. I bought Fritz 16, Fritz 17 and Fat Fritz 1.
Because, I am deciding, what I am interested in and what I am testing. And nobody can and will tell me, what I am allowed to test. Thats why I am paying for engines: The only way to stay really free and independent as a tester is the willingness to pay for commercial engines. I am tester and not a judge. If anybody doesnt like my testwork - no problem. Just do not visit my website. But nobody will tell me, what I am allowed to test. For a tester, independence and transparency are the most important virtues. Not pretending being a judge, like so many others here on talkchess and in the computerchess community do.
If anyone believes, a software is illegal: go to court and win. Case closed. Everything else is trashtalk (best case) or a witch hunt (worst case). And thats not my business. Ending this is the change, the community badly needs. My 2 cents.
Spirited and classy. The test community fights back!
No. FatFritz2 testers obviously are a different brand and need to defend FatFritz2 by all means - not surprising.
(and they are always non-programmers too, a coincidence?)
In some ways, coding and testing require a somewhat different mentality.
If I was a tester, I would test FF2: it seems to be overhyped and immoral, and you obviously disapprove of it, but there is public interest in its playing strength, so absolutely I would test it.
IMO, there are too many programs on test lists now, so I would offer multiple filters on a test list that I produced. Not sure how I would classify FF2 - maybe something like "celebrity fork".
I could easily reel off several examples of a brand name reselling the products of an unknown brand (I'm wearing one on my wrist right now - a fitness tracker made by Huami but sold under the Xiaomi brand name. Huami also make Amazon's "Amazfit" trackers) - though usually, of course, both parties benefit. It is possible that Stockfish could one day benefit: in the unlikely event of the "Chessbase" brand outlasting the "Stockfish" brand, products like FF2 would remind people of Stockfish's existence, and the important role it's playing at the present time.
Does anyone understand what witch hunting has to do with the facts about FF2?
(and the lies in the beginning and the marketing scam, which goes down to pieces now slowly)
Probably he still believes in a witchhunt vs. Houdini too?
The sentence 'I am a tester not a judge' leaves some bitter aftertaste, it is quite analogue to a lot of horrible wrongdoings in mankind.
Writing is the antidote to confusion.
It's not "how smart you are", it's "how are you smart".
Your brain doesn't work the way you want, so train it!