Fabien's open letter to the community

Discussion of anything and everything relating to chess playing software and machines.

Moderators: hgm, Harvey Williamson, bob

Forum rules
This textbox is used to restore diagrams posted with the [d] tag before the upgrade.
Xann
Posts: 125
Joined: Sat Jan 22, 2011 6:14 pm
Location: Lille, France

Re: ......Any answer to this Mr Wael??

Post by Xann » Tue Jan 25, 2011 3:29 pm

Dr.Wael Deeb wrote:And one more thing....Fabien didn't ask me to show where Vasik said so,so stop twisting the facts....
I asked for a link, but testimony by others would be useful for me.

Are we talking about the same thing: "Vasik said he contacted Fabien about xxx and Fabien answered it was OK for him"?
Who else remembers this? What was "xxx"?

Fabien.

User avatar
Dr.Wael Deeb
Posts: 9635
Joined: Wed Mar 08, 2006 7:44 pm
Location: Amman,Jordan

Re: ......Any answer to this Mr Wael??

Post by Dr.Wael Deeb » Tue Jan 25, 2011 3:41 pm

Xann wrote:
Dr.Wael Deeb wrote:And one more thing....Fabien didn't ask me to show where Vasik said so,so stop twisting the facts....
I asked for a link, but testimony by others would be useful for me.

Are we talking about the same thing: "Vasik said he contacted Fabien about xxx and Fabien answered it was OK for him"?
Who else remembers this? What was "xxx"?

Fabien.
I'll try my best to find at least one link to confirm this....

Unfortunately,I don't have the habbit to keep records of statements posted through the computer chess fora and now I regret it....

But I am sure that Vasik said this,I read it with my own eyes....I hope other people can help....

As a physician I am used to remember my patients verbal statements and keep them for the evaluation of their condition....so I'm pretty sure Vasik did say so and that's why he's keeping radio silence....one of the reasons at least....
Dr.D
_No one can hit as hard as life.But it ain’t about how hard you can hit.It’s about how hard you can get hit and keep moving forward.How much you can take and keep moving forward….

Uri Blass
Posts: 8036
Joined: Wed Mar 08, 2006 11:37 pm
Location: Tel-Aviv Israel

Re: ......Any answer to this Mr Wael??

Post by Uri Blass » Tue Jan 25, 2011 3:42 pm

Xann wrote:
Dr.Wael Deeb wrote:And one more thing....Fabien didn't ask me to show where Vasik said so,so stop twisting the facts....
I asked for a link, but testimony by others would be useful for me.

Are we talking about the same thing: "Vasik said he contacted Fabien about xxx and Fabien answered it was OK for him"?
Who else remembers this? What was "xxx"?

Fabien.
I do not remember that Vas said that he contacted you.

Xann
Posts: 125
Joined: Sat Jan 22, 2011 6:14 pm
Location: Lille, France

Re: Fabien's open letter to the community

Post by Xann » Tue Jan 25, 2011 3:48 pm

Gian-Carlo Pascutto wrote:You could say I "Fruited" the computer go people in 2008 :-P
Noooooo, what have you done?
This was way too early.

Here's the right way.
You wait some 15 years to see who's well established at the top.
Say Zen 42 vs. Erica 38
Then you go to world champs with a couple of mates and let the two champions fight for 3rd place.
Make sure they write down your name correctly too, because they've never heard of you.

BTW I sometimes chat with ajahuang on KGS.
Remi Coulom lives in the same city as me, too.

Fabien.

Robert Flesher
Posts: 1205
Joined: Tue Aug 18, 2009 1:06 am

Re: ......Any answer to this Mr Wael??

Post by Robert Flesher » Tue Jan 25, 2011 3:52 pm

Xann wrote:
Dr.Wael Deeb wrote:And one more thing....Fabien didn't ask me to show where Vasik said so,so stop twisting the facts....
I asked for a link, but testimony by others would be useful for me.

Are we talking about the same thing: "Vasik said he contacted Fabien about xxx and Fabien answered it was OK for him"?
Who else remembers this? What was "xxx"?

Fabien.
This is not what you directly asked for Fabien, but after 5 years gone maybe there is some useful info here.

Fruit GPL chess engine controversy
Rybka has been accused of being based on Fruit, but Rajlich has denied this categorically.[40] Further allegations of violating the GPL have been brought forward by chess programmer Zach Wegner based on a new decompilation effort and a one year study of the Rybka 1.0 executable.[41] Vas has since declined to respond to these allegations.[42]

[edit] Strelka controversyIn May 2007, a new chess engine called Strelka appeared on the scene, claimed to be written by Yuri Osipov. Soon, there were allegations that Strelka was a clone of Rybka 1.0 beta, in the sense that it was a reverse-engineered and slightly modified version of Rybka.[43] Several players found Strelka to yield identical analysis to Rybka in a variety of different situations, even having the same bugs and weaknesses in some cases. Osipov, however, stated repeatedly on discussion boards that Strelka was based on Fruit, not Rybka, and that any similarities was either because Rybka also was based on Fruit, or because he had tuned the evaluation function to be as close to Rybka as possible.[44][45]

With the release of Strelka 2.0 beta, source code was included. Rajlich stated that the source made it "obvious" that Strelka 2.0 beta was indeed a Rybka 1.0 beta clone, although not without some improvements in certain areas. On basis of this, he claimed the source as his own and intended to re-release it under his own name,[46] although he later decided not to do so. He also made allegations that "Yuri Osipov" was a pen name.

However, according to Victor Zakharov (Convekta company) in his review for Arena chess website, he said "I consider that Yuri Osipov (Ivanovich) is real name. He didn't hide it. However I can't state this with 100% assurance." And he also has some contact with Yuri Osipov for development of mobile platforms chess program.[47]

[edit] IPPOLIT controversyIPPOLIT, RobboLito, Igorrit, IvanHoe, FireBird and Fire are a series of strong open source chess programs, originally developed by a team of anonymous programmers who call themselves the Decembrists, after the Decembrist revolt.[48][49]

The chess engine IPPOLIT was released in October 2009 with its source code. Vasik Rajlich has stated[50] that IPPOLIT is a decompiled version of Rybka, and that the people involved kept him informed of their progress via email.[51] Currently there is only circumstantial evidence for this claim. No legal charges have been filed against any of the engines in the IPPOLIT series.[citation needed] Circumstantial evidence for the claim by Vasik Rajlich is provided by the fact that the source of IPPOLIT[52] resembles the output of a decompiler and furthermore the playing style of IPPOLIT and its derivatives is close to that of Rybka 3.[53] Finally some people have expressed doubts that a super strong chess engine like IPPOLIT could simply appear out of nowhere.[54]


source :

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rybka

Xann
Posts: 125
Joined: Sat Jan 22, 2011 6:14 pm
Location: Lille, France

Re: Fabien's open letter to the community

Post by Xann » Tue Jan 25, 2011 4:03 pm

hgm wrote:That is really funny, because it would mean WinBoard will be distributed with GNU Chess after all. Because now I am distributing it with Fruit 2.1! :lol:

I hope for sure that they will distribute it with a Polyglot version that is compatible with the new XBoard protocol, and not one that would break all the functions for setting the engine options from the XBoard menus.

Who do I contact about this?
Not so fast.
I have some questions to ask first.

Could you create a thread in the programming forum?

Thanks,

Fabien.

bob
Posts: 20346
Joined: Mon Feb 27, 2006 6:30 pm
Location: Birmingham, AL

Re: Fabien's open letter to the community

Post by bob » Tue Jan 25, 2011 4:24 pm

Xann wrote:
bob wrote:Of course, this is nothing new to those of us that looked and listened in the first place...
Bob,

We never really met, so, nice to meet you!
I am sorry that many people apparently did not listen to you.

Fabien.
Me too. But if someone believes something strong enough, _nothing_ will alter their opinion. Basic human nature. We have now reached a totally insane point in computer chess where we have dozens of strong programs, claiming to not be derivative works.

bob
Posts: 20346
Joined: Mon Feb 27, 2006 6:30 pm
Location: Birmingham, AL

Re: Fabien's open letter to the community

Post by bob » Tue Jan 25, 2011 4:26 pm

Dr.Wael Deeb wrote:
Graham Banks wrote:
M ANSARI wrote:Somehow I feel I understand the post differently than others. It seems like Fabien is "asking" about several allegations and wants to be up to date on what the allegations are ... nothing I read says anything about confirming anything..........
This is also how I see it at this stage.
Fabien is asking for further information and will then need time to study what is required before he can make some definitive statements on the issue.
I think it's great that Fabien has chosen to get involved and I sincerely hope that Vas will have his say too (if required).
Vasik will remain silent like a butt as he always do....
The good thing is that the whole chess community will finally recognize him as a fat liar....
Dr.D
I would not be so sure. I am certain that some will now claim that Fabien is "in on the conspiracy" as well... This is an unwinable argument for some.

bob
Posts: 20346
Joined: Mon Feb 27, 2006 6:30 pm
Location: Birmingham, AL

Re: Solution

Post by bob » Tue Jan 25, 2011 4:28 pm

stevenaaus wrote:Hmmm... Please stop bickering about things that will (in all likelihood) never be resolved.

The only positive actions are to cease the whole blame game, and accept Houdini and at least one Ippolit engine as valid engines for testing.
So derivative works are OK??? Do you think Matt Reilly would be OK with someone selling a new book "area 52" that is a 99% copy of his bestseller?

User avatar
hgm
Posts: 22316
Joined: Fri Mar 10, 2006 9:06 am
Location: Amsterdam
Full name: H G Muller
Contact:

Re: Solution

Post by hgm » Tue Jan 25, 2011 4:57 pm

Well, it is clear that there are quite a few people that are monomanic about nclusion of Houdini in the CCRL testing.

"Rybka a derivative of Fruit? Then you must test Houdini!"
"Stockfish surpasses Rybka? Then you must test Houdini!"
"Your neigbor's dog crapped at your doorstep? Then you must test Houdini!"

Etc, etc.

Post Reply