Fabien's open letter to the community

Discussion of anything and everything relating to chess playing software and machines.

Moderators: hgm, Harvey Williamson, bob

Forum rules
This textbox is used to restore diagrams posted with the [d] tag before the upgrade.
User avatar
geots
Posts: 4790
Joined: Fri Mar 10, 2006 11:42 pm

Re: Fabien's open letter to the community

Post by geots » Thu Feb 03, 2011 3:49 am

bob wrote:
geots wrote:
SzG wrote:I am lost in this avalanche of post so I must ask someone to enlighten me: if all Fabien saw was his own code and the Strelka code, how is he to know what was the way Rybka was made? He has only the same two source codes at his disposal which have been there for studying for more than 3 years.
So what is new here that makes some posters think Rybka is illegal?

I would imagine much to Bob's dismay, Rybka is here to stay. All I see is an interesting direction to an old worn out argument :roll:
Not _my_ dismay. Fabiens. To answer the question you replied to without answering anything, several have worked to disassemble Rybka 1 beta. That has been compared to fruit, and that's the current topic of the day. Strelka is, for the moment, irrelevant. It might turn out to be an illegal copy of an illegal copy, who knows what that would mean.


Hi Bob- I"ll go along with you on that. You made perfect sense. Good answer. You got me there.


All the Best

User avatar
geots
Posts: 4790
Joined: Fri Mar 10, 2006 11:42 pm

Re: Fabien's open letter to the community

Post by geots » Thu Feb 03, 2011 4:25 am

Christopher Conkie wrote:
F. Bluemers wrote:
Christopher Conkie wrote:
F. Bluemers wrote: Another post that doesn't help Fabien a ...,but after 63 pages of ... why not me too :lol:
Exactly......if you cant beat the crap.....join in but tread carefully.

My thoughts entirely.

How are you btw Fonzy?

:)
I'm fine but unfortunatly I picked up Dirt again,just could not resist...
:D
Nothing wrong with getting ones hands dirty once in a while......

:)



Dirts ok, but stay away from any pigs. You'll both get muddy, but the pig likes it :lol:


Hang in there

User avatar
geots
Posts: 4790
Joined: Fri Mar 10, 2006 11:42 pm

Re: Fabien's open letter to the community

Post by geots » Thu Feb 03, 2011 4:54 am

Graham Banks wrote:
bob wrote:
Sven Schüle wrote:
bob wrote:
Xann wrote:
bob wrote:Just for the record, to eliminate this specific argument, when Zach, CT, I and others looked at the fruit/rybka1 question, we did _not_ involve Strelka. Strelka was the thing that exposed the issue, but we directly compared fruit to rybka, so the strelka issue could not be raised again...
What happened then?

Fabien.
We found _lots_ of similarities. Zach created a web page that went into great detail with the analysis. There are some obvious differences between Fruit and Rybka, but there are a _ton_ of similarities. Too many to be pure luck.
But these similarities are not a proof of code copying.

Sven
If you look at my previous comments, "similarity" is "identical code". The entire program was not copied. But large chunks were. That _is_ proof of code copying...

Since large chunks were copied, but not everything, I chose to not say "identical" to be accurate. But they are _very_ similar. Moreso when you factor out the bitboard changes...
Just one question Bob. What happens if this case is tried by the FSF (and I hope it is because we all want to see the matter resolved with some finality), and Vas is cleared?

Cheers,
Graham.

Dont even have to say I've missed talking to you. That goes without saying.

Be safe, Graham

User avatar
geots
Posts: 4790
Joined: Fri Mar 10, 2006 11:42 pm

Re: On principle CCRL will be removing all Rybka programs...

Post by geots » Thu Feb 03, 2011 5:41 am

How long did it take you to dream up this train wreck :roll:

User avatar
mhull
Posts: 11297
Joined: Wed Mar 08, 2006 8:02 pm
Location: Dallas, Texas
Full name: Matthew Hull

Re: Fabien's open letter to the community

Post by mhull » Thu Feb 03, 2011 6:29 am

Graham Banks wrote:Just one question Bob. What happens if this case is tried by the FSF (and I hope it is because we all want to see the matter resolved with some finality), and Vas is cleared?
Just one question Graham. Why did you censor the ippo/robbo progs on a mere accusation, but don't censor Rybka on a mere accusation?
Matthew Hull

User avatar
geots
Posts: 4790
Joined: Fri Mar 10, 2006 11:42 pm

Re: On principle CCRL will be removing all Rybka programs...

Post by geots » Thu Feb 03, 2011 7:16 am

I have a real hard time believing you are speaking for CCRL. I know most of the testers-been there, done that. I cant believe they sent you to come over here and give the news. That is not their style. And another point:
Did they hire you to run CCRL

playjunior
Posts: 338
Joined: Thu Jun 21, 2007 10:53 pm

Re: Fabien's open letter to the community

Post by playjunior » Thu Feb 03, 2011 11:37 am

bob wrote:
Milos wrote:
bob wrote:I have also seen where those public machines have been broken into, and files copied (including 100Ks of credit card numbers). IMAP won't help you one bit there...
It's rather simple.
Take all your programs zip it in a file (I seriously doubt there would be more than 100MB size in total) and encrypt with like AES256 and then send it to yourself on IMAP account (divide a file if necessary and test everything if it works).

I really don't see how that is unreliably or breakable or hackable (unless you lose the key, but that's another issue)...
The issue is, "where is that file stored?" If it is on my office box, I have complete control, and my office machine has never been broken into. If it is on gmail, there is no guarantee of any such protection for privacy, which is a requirement for my email account due to FIRPA, HIPA and such. So gmail is out. And the machine in my office is the same machine where the program copies exist.

BTW, each version of Crafty is maybe a meg. There are thousands of intermediate versions, or gigabytes of data...
Bob if you have encrypted it properly why would you care if you lose control?

I have 2.5 GB of mails on Gmail, which is 33% of allowed free limit in the moment. Not a single mail lost or deleted for like 5 years. All attachments there etc.
We're not suggesting you migrate your mail to "public" places, but for backup it's perfect. My initial point was that today its much easier to do it, because, em, in 1995 you couldn't have 7.5 GB free mailbox with 25MB attachments.

rodolfoleoni
Posts: 263
Joined: Mon Nov 29, 2010 8:16 pm

Re: Fabien's open letter to the community

Post by rodolfoleoni » Thu Feb 03, 2011 1:19 pm

Lots of posts, I just cannot read all of them. But I noticed Mr. Letouzey "disappeared" from discussion. What if he'll do nothing about all that stuff?
Rodolfo (The Baron Team)

SzG
Posts: 2454
Joined: Fri Mar 10, 2006 6:20 am
Location: Szentendre, Hungary
Full name: Gabor Szots

Re: Fabien's open letter to the community

Post by SzG » Thu Feb 03, 2011 1:26 pm

rodolfoleoni wrote:I noticed Mr. Letouzey "disappeared" from discussion. What if he'll do nothing about all that stuff?
Then those who urged him to do something will be disappointed.
Gabor Szots

CCRL testing group

User avatar
JuLieN
Posts: 2945
Joined: Mon May 05, 2008 10:16 am
Location: Nantes (France)
Contact:

Re: Fabien's open letter to the community

Post by JuLieN » Thu Feb 03, 2011 1:28 pm

rodolfoleoni wrote:Lots of posts, I just cannot read all of them. But I noticed Mr. Letouzey "disappeared" from discussion. What if he'll do nothing about all that stuff?
Fabien noticed that all he said/wrote was used and deformed by everyone to make him say whatever pleased each camp. So now he favors private talks. But rest assure than in the end, when he's managed to gather enough informations to build a solid opinion he'll make a public statement . :)
"The only good bug is a dead bug." (Don Dailey)
Image [Blog: http://tinyurl.com/predateur ] [Facebook: http://tinyurl.com/fbpredateur ] [MacEngines: http://tinyurl.com/macengines ]

Post Reply