first results for CEGT 40/20
Code: Select all
Nemo 1.0.1 x64 2874 - Deep Junior 12.5 w32 1CPU 24.0 - 26.0 +16/-18/=16 48.00%
Nemo 1.0.1 x64 2876 - Rybka 2.3.2a w32 1CPU 19.0 - 31.0 +7/-19/=24 38.00%Moderator: Ras
Code: Select all
Nemo 1.0.1 x64 2874 - Deep Junior 12.5 w32 1CPU 24.0 - 26.0 +16/-18/=16 48.00%
Nemo 1.0.1 x64 2876 - Rybka 2.3.2a w32 1CPU 19.0 - 31.0 +7/-19/=24 38.00%
Hello, Lucacs,lucasart wrote:If you decide to go open source, you're more likely to receive relevant feedback!Desperado wrote: Feedbacks are welcome, so we can improve Nemo continually.![]()
up to you
Thanks, Werner.Werner wrote:Hi,
first results for CEGT 40/20WernerCode: Select all
Nemo 1.0.1 x64 2874 - Deep Junior 12.5 w32 1CPU 24.0 - 26.0 +16/-18/=16 48.00% Nemo 1.0.1 x64 2876 - Rybka 2.3.2a w32 1CPU 19.0 - 31.0 +7/-19/=24 38.00%
Thx, Enrico !noctiferus wrote:Summary of STS test results:
( see http://sites.google.com/site/strategictestsuite/ )
Exact moves: 882/1300 class B+
Score: 10011/13000 class A
It seems Nemo has some troubles in finding the best moves in the theme STS8: Advancement of f-g-h pawns.
For comparison with other engines,see
http://sites.google.com/site/strategict ... sts-1---12
These are Swami's old results, but his settings are roughly comparable with mine.
I'm posting more detailed reports on www.open-chess.org , because I don't know how to attach files here (is it possible?)
Code: Select all
Nemo 1.0.1 x64 2937 - Deep Shredder 11 x64 1CPU 28.5 - 21.5 +21/-14/=15 57.00%
Nemo 1.0.1 x64 2881 - Deep Sjeng WC 2008 w32 1CPU 26.5 - 23.5 +17/-14/=19 53.00%
Jawohl !tpetzke wrote:Actually Michael and Sven are really helpful here in explaining ideas, answering questions or even share bits of source to explain an idea. Disclosing the complete source of their engine would not provide much additional value to engine authors, but we would probably find more nemos than we asked for soon.
Thomas...

