Discussion of chess software programming and technical issues.
Moderator: Ras
Nordlandia
Posts: 2838 Joined: Fri Sep 25, 2015 9:38 pm
Location: Sortland, Norway
Post
by Nordlandia » Wed Apr 04, 2018 11:43 pm
Normal distribution graph based on 20 games in 5+5 format.
Data
Code: Select all
00:14:02
00:18:24
00:18:02
00:15:46
00:10:04
00:16:22
00:08:18
00:20:38
00:20:49
00:14:54
00:18:30
00:23:08
00:14:16
00:14:25
00:19:58
00:16:10
00:15:11
00:17:29
00:13:50
00:14:12
Code: Select all
43.5
56
52.5
45
28
48.5
22
69
70.5
46.5
57.5
82
40
44.5
65.5
48.5
46
55
40.5
42.5
Nordlandia
Posts: 2838 Joined: Fri Sep 25, 2015 9:38 pm
Location: Sortland, Norway
Post
by Nordlandia » Thu Apr 05, 2018 12:00 am
Houdini used contempt -4 and surprisingly tied Stockfish dev.
Code: Select all
5+5 Q9650 | 3-Core | Probing 5-men 2018
12345678901234567890
1 stockfish_18040400_x64 ½½½½½½½½0½½½½½1½½½½½ 10.0/20 100.00
2 Houdini 6 ½½½½½½½½1½½½½½0½½½½½ 10.0/20 100.00
Dann Corbit
Posts: 12870 Joined: Wed Mar 08, 2006 8:57 pm
Location: Redmond, WA USA
Post
by Dann Corbit » Thu Apr 05, 2018 12:12 am
Nordlandia wrote: Houdini used contempt -4 and surprisingly tied Stockfish dev.
Code: Select all
5+5 Q9650 | 3-Core | Probing 5-men 2018
12345678901234567890
1 stockfish_18040400_x64 ½½½½½½½½0½½½½½1½½½½½ 10.0/20 100.00
2 Houdini 6 ½½½½½½½½1½½½½½0½½½½½ 10.0/20 100.00
I do not think that you can tell a lot from 100 games.
I think you can tell very little indeed from 20 games.
Almost every outcome is unsurprising in a sample that small.
Taking ideas is not a vice, it is a virtue. We have another word for this. It is called learning.
But sharing ideas is an even greater virtue. We have another word for this. It is called teaching.