how can getting nice results against SF be boring?Guenther wrote:I said 'with relevance and substance'. I mean of course, scientifically and reproducible... this is the most important about what 'we' do.Lyudmil Tsvetkov wrote: you say I never contributed anything, and all my posted positions have alwasy been boring.
(boring is your attitude...)
But this leads to nothing as expected. You are not able to do sth. under such conditions and you don't even know what it means.
it seems to me it is the other way round: losing all the time vs SF is definitely boring.
scientifical, reproducible..., I don't understand what you are talking about.