Who else finds g5??

Discussion of anything and everything relating to chess playing software and machines.

Moderator: Ras

bob
Posts: 20943
Joined: Mon Feb 27, 2006 7:30 pm
Location: Birmingham, AL

Re: Who else finds g5??

Post by bob »

AdminX wrote:Correction:

[d]7k/8/8/1p6/p5N1/r4p2/1K6/8 b - - 0 51

Black played the strong and simple 51. ... Ra2!! 52. kxa2 and it was over for white as the following position shows.

[d]7k/8/8/1p6/p5N1/5p2/K7/8 b - - 0 52
I studied this just a bit with crafty, nothing involved. Much better than Ra2+ is b4 which is a mate in 15 or less. It likes b4 with a huge score from the beginning and finds a mate in 15 in under 30 seconds. Deeper search might find something somewhat shorter.
Terry McCracken
Posts: 16465
Joined: Wed Aug 01, 2007 4:16 am
Location: Canada

Re: Who else finds g5??

Post by Terry McCracken »

bob wrote:
AdminX wrote:Correction:

[d]7k/8/8/1p6/p5N1/r4p2/1K6/8 b - - 0 51

Black played the strong and simple 51. ... Ra2!! 52. kxa2 and it was over for white as the following position shows.

[d]7k/8/8/1p6/p5N1/5p2/K7/8 b - - 0 52
I studied this just a bit with crafty, nothing involved. Much better than Ra2+ is b4 which is a mate in 15 or less. It likes b4 with a huge score from the beginning and finds a mate in 15 in under 30 seconds. Deeper search might find something somewhat shorter.
The point is the move was humanlike in a spooky sort of way.
bob
Posts: 20943
Joined: Mon Feb 27, 2006 7:30 pm
Location: Birmingham, AL

Re: Who else finds g5??

Post by bob »

Terry McCracken wrote:
bob wrote:
AdminX wrote:Correction:

[d]7k/8/8/1p6/p5N1/r4p2/1K6/8 b - - 0 51

Black played the strong and simple 51. ... Ra2!! 52. kxa2 and it was over for white as the following position shows.

[d]7k/8/8/1p6/p5N1/5p2/K7/8 b - - 0 52
I studied this just a bit with crafty, nothing involved. Much better than Ra2+ is b4 which is a mate in 15 or less. It likes b4 with a huge score from the beginning and finds a mate in 15 in under 30 seconds. Deeper search might find something somewhat shorter.
The point is the move was humanlike in a spooky sort of way.
what would worry me is that b4 has such a huge eval, Ra2 would have to have an equally huge eval or else the program went for a poor choice. Ra2 will ultimately lead to mate, but given a minute Crafty never saw anything near the eval of b4 after a few seconds...
Terry McCracken
Posts: 16465
Joined: Wed Aug 01, 2007 4:16 am
Location: Canada

Re: Who else finds g5??

Post by Terry McCracken »

bob wrote:
Terry McCracken wrote:
bob wrote:
AdminX wrote:Correction:

[d]7k/8/8/1p6/p5N1/r4p2/1K6/8 b - - 0 51

Black played the strong and simple 51. ... Ra2!! 52. kxa2 and it was over for white as the following position shows.

[d]7k/8/8/1p6/p5N1/5p2/K7/8 b - - 0 52
I studied this just a bit with crafty, nothing involved. Much better than Ra2+ is b4 which is a mate in 15 or less. It likes b4 with a huge score from the beginning and finds a mate in 15 in under 30 seconds. Deeper search might find something somewhat shorter.
The point is the move was humanlike in a spooky sort of way.
what would worry me is that b4 has such a huge eval, Ra2 would have to have an equally huge eval or else the program went for a poor choice. Ra2 will ultimately lead to mate, but given a minute Crafty never saw anything near the eval of b4 after a few seconds...
I checked, there's nothing wrong with the eval. My guess is time, inter alia, may have been the issue and the program had a hiccup so to speak.

This is your area; maybe you can find the cause?
dlunow

Re: Who else finds g5??

Post by dlunow »

51. Rb3 is also #13
Terry McCracken
Posts: 16465
Joined: Wed Aug 01, 2007 4:16 am
Location: Canada

Re: Who else finds g5??

Post by Terry McCracken »

Terry McCracken wrote:
bob wrote:
Terry McCracken wrote:
bob wrote:
AdminX wrote:Correction:

[d]7k/8/8/1p6/p5N1/r4p2/1K6/8 b - - 0 51

Black played the strong and simple 51. ... Ra2!! 52. kxa2 and it was over for white as the following position shows.

[d]7k/8/8/1p6/p5N1/5p2/K7/8 b - - 0 52
I studied this just a bit with crafty, nothing involved. Much better than Ra2+ is b4 which is a mate in 15 or less. It likes b4 with a huge score from the beginning and finds a mate in 15 in under 30 seconds. Deeper search might find something somewhat shorter.
The point is the move was humanlike in a spooky sort of way.
what would worry me is that b4 has such a huge eval, Ra2 would have to have an equally huge eval or else the program went for a poor choice. Ra2 will ultimately lead to mate, but given a minute Crafty never saw anything near the eval of b4 after a few seconds...
I checked, there's nothing wrong with the eval. My guess is time, inter alia, may have been the issue and the program had a hiccup so to speak.

This is your area; maybe you can find the cause?
I wondering if was an EGTB problem?
rightrook
Posts: 1452
Joined: Wed Mar 08, 2006 8:45 pm

Re: Who else finds g5??

Post by rightrook »

You are right..!!

Hiarcs 11.2 finds it right away....
but Junior 10 does not find it.... :o

regards

Robert