New chess engine - DoubleCheck 1.0 (Lucas Braesch)

Discussion of anything and everything relating to chess playing software and machines.

Moderator: Ras

tmokonen
Posts: 1362
Joined: Sun Mar 12, 2006 6:46 pm
Location: Kelowna
Full name: Tony Mokonen

Re: New chess engine - DoubleCheck 1.0 (Lucas Braesch)

Post by tmokonen »

Lucas, I made some (probably slow) compiles of your program for Windows. Do you mind if I share these with the world?
User avatar
Graham Banks
Posts: 44541
Joined: Sun Feb 26, 2006 10:52 am
Location: Auckland, NZ

Re: New chess engine - DoubleCheck 1.0 (Lucas Braesch)

Post by Graham Banks »

tmokonen wrote:Lucas, I made some (probably slow) compiles of your program for Windows. Do you mind if I share these with the world?
Hopefully Lucas will agree. I wouldn't mind a 32-bit Windows compile. 8-)
gbanksnz at gmail.com
lucasart
Posts: 3241
Joined: Mon May 31, 2010 1:29 pm
Full name: lucasart

Re: New chess engine - DoubleCheck 1.0 (Lucas Braesch)

Post by lucasart »

tmokonen wrote:Lucas, I made some (probably slow) compiles of your program for Windows. Do you mind if I share these with the world?
I don't mind at all. Sharing is GOOD, sharing is NOT piracy, sharing has nothing to do with attacking a ship and killing everyone abord ;) That's what the GNU GPL is all about!

However, don't forget to include the source code and the license agreement along with the windows compile (that's how the GNU GPL protects free software from becoming evil proprietary software)

Anyway, it's all explained in the last section of my readme.txt, as well as in the preambule of the copying.txt file (GNU GPL v3)

Thank you
lucasart
Posts: 3241
Joined: Mon May 31, 2010 1:29 pm
Full name: lucasart

Re: New chess engine - DoubleCheck 1.0 (Lucas Braesch)

Post by lucasart »

Graham Banks wrote:
tmokonen wrote:Lucas, I made some (probably slow) compiles of your program for Windows. Do you mind if I share these with the world?
Hopefully Lucas will agree. I wouldn't mind a 32-bit Windows compile. 8-)
Actually 32 bit compatibility requires some rewriting of a few bitboard functions (regardless of windows or posix plateform). It's not a lot of work, but I can't be bothered for now. Maybe one day, if I feel in the mood for 32 bit code...?
lucasart
Posts: 3241
Joined: Mon May 31, 2010 1:29 pm
Full name: lucasart

Re: New chess engine - DoubleCheck 1.0 (Lucas Braesch)

Post by lucasart »

tmokonen wrote:I was looking at your compile, assuming it was a Windows one because the file name ended in .exe. Silly me.
Actually you can't be blamed for that! An *.exe file should always be a Windows executable. It is quite silly to name a Linux executable with a .exe extension at the end (although it works and linux doesn't care about file extensions).
I think the renaming was done by Leo before he put it on the WBEC site. I send him an email so he can correct it. It is confusing indeed ;)
tmokonen
Posts: 1362
Joined: Sun Mar 12, 2006 6:46 pm
Location: Kelowna
Full name: Tony Mokonen

Re: New chess engine - DoubleCheck 1.0 (Lucas Braesch)

Post by tmokonen »

lucasart wrote:
tmokonen wrote:Lucas, I made some (probably slow) compiles of your program for Windows. Do you mind if I share these with the world?
I don't mind at all. Sharing is GOOD, sharing is NOT piracy, sharing has nothing to do with attacking a ship and killing everyone abord ;) That's what the GNU GPL is all about!

However, don't forget to include the source code and the license agreement along with the windows compile (that's how the GNU GPL protects free software from becoming evil proprietary software)

Anyway, it's all explained in the last section of my readme.txt, as well as in the preambule of the copying.txt file (GNU GPL v3)

Thank you
Thank you. I had to add a couple of publicly available header files for inttypes.h and stdbool.h, because the compiler I used was not C99 compatible. Both of these header files appear to be GPL compliant, and I included them in the package. I didn't do any PGO or too many advanced command line compilation options, so I'm sure someone brighter than me can make a faster compile if they so wish.

I placed the compiles here:

http://www3.telus.net/tmokonen/DoubleCh ... indows.rar

I've had a few people tell me that they had trouble downloading from my personal web space, so I have an alternate download location here if the above link doesn't work:

http://www.megaupload.com/?d=4WUQM4Z6
lucasart
Posts: 3241
Joined: Mon May 31, 2010 1:29 pm
Full name: lucasart

Re: New chess engine - DoubleCheck 1.0 (Lucas Braesch)

Post by lucasart »

tmokonen wrote:
lucasart wrote:
tmokonen wrote:Lucas, I made some (probably slow) compiles of your program for Windows. Do you mind if I share these with the world?
I don't mind at all. Sharing is GOOD, sharing is NOT piracy, sharing has nothing to do with attacking a ship and killing everyone abord ;) That's what the GNU GPL is all about!

However, don't forget to include the source code and the license agreement along with the windows compile (that's how the GNU GPL protects free software from becoming evil proprietary software)

Anyway, it's all explained in the last section of my readme.txt, as well as in the preambule of the copying.txt file (GNU GPL v3)

Thank you
Thank you. I had to add a couple of publicly available header files for inttypes.h and stdbool.h, because the compiler I used was not C99 compatible. Both of these header files appear to be GPL compliant, and I included them in the package. I didn't do any PGO or too many advanced command line compilation options, so I'm sure someone brighter than me can make a faster compile if they so wish.

I placed the compiles here:

http://www3.telus.net/tmokonen/DoubleCh ... indows.rar

I've had a few people tell me that they had trouble downloading from my personal web space, so I have an alternate download location here if the above link doesn't work:

http://www.megaupload.com/?d=4WUQM4Z6
Thank you!
I think this will be useful to a lot of people, since most use Windows.
User avatar
Graham Banks
Posts: 44541
Joined: Sun Feb 26, 2006 10:52 am
Location: Auckland, NZ

Re: New chess engine - DoubleCheck 1.0 (Lucas Braesch)

Post by Graham Banks »

lucasart wrote:
tmokonen wrote:I was looking at your compile, assuming it was a Windows one because the file name ended in .exe. Silly me.
Actually you can't be blamed for that! An *.exe file should always be a Windows executable. It is quite silly to name a Linux executable with a .exe extension at the end (although it works and linux doesn't care about file extensions).
I think the renaming was done by Leo before he put it on the WBEC site. I send him an email so he can correct it. It is confusing indeed ;)
Hi Lucas,

I can't speak for Leo, but I saved the attachment that you emailed me and put it straight onto the CCRL public forum for others to get. I did nothing at all to the name of the file.

Cheers,
Graham.
gbanksnz at gmail.com
User avatar
Le Fou numerique
Posts: 859
Joined: Wed Apr 05, 2006 9:58 pm
Location: Elsass

Re: New chess engine - DoubleCheck 1.0 (Lucas Braesch)

Post by Le Fou numerique »

Hi,

A logo (?)

Image

Regards,
Patrick
User avatar
Graham Banks
Posts: 44541
Joined: Sun Feb 26, 2006 10:52 am
Location: Auckland, NZ

Re: New chess engine - DoubleCheck 1.0 (Lucas Braesch)

Post by Graham Banks »

Le Fou numerique wrote:Hi,

A logo (?)

Image

Regards,
Patrick
Here's another:

Image
gbanksnz at gmail.com