laoliveirajr wrote:Thank you Graham,
for a great tournament!
Normally the Capivara will best in the tournaments with smaller time control, but in this 40/40 the Capivara had the amazing performance.
Thanks for testing the Capivara chess engine.
You are a great motivator for those programmers who have less time and resources.
Best wishes
Lourenço
Just a thought- you get into some stronger competition, you are going to have to give it some hash to use- it is basically running on empty.
But congrats here-
george
Thank you George,
I made a small fix (I changed 3 characters in the code!).
CapivaraLK009a01a and CapivaraLK009a02a versions were recompiled,
and are re-published now at: vivaxadrez.wikispaces.com/Capivara
13.02.2013 - Capivara_LK_0.09a02a - UCi - 32-bit & 64-bit - Re-Builded in 16.05.2013 ( Compilada a partir do MS Visual Studio 2010. Você precisará usar a "Visual C runtime libraries" ... )
13.02.2013 - Capivara_LK_0.09a01a- UCi -32-bit & 64-bit - Re-Builded in 16.05.2013 ( Compilada a partir do MS Visual Studio 2010. Você precisará usar a "Visual Cruntime libraries" ... )
laoliveirajr wrote:Thank you Graham,
for a great tournament!
Normally the Capivara will best in the tournaments with smaller time control, but in this 40/40 the Capivara had the amazing performance.
Thanks for testing the Capivara chess engine.
You are a great motivator for those programmers who have less time and resources.
Best wishes
Lourenço
Just a thought- you get into some stronger competition, you are going to have to give it some hash to use- it is basically running on empty.
But congrats here-
george
Thank you George,
I made a small fix (I changed 3 characters in the code!).
CapivaraLK009a01a and CapivaraLK009a02a versions were recompiled,
and are re-published now at: vivaxadrez.wikispaces.com/Capivara
13.02.2013 - Capivara_LK_0.09a02a - UCi - 32-bit & 64-bit - Re-Builded in 16.05.2013 ( Compilada a partir do MS Visual Studio 2010. Você precisará usar a "Visual C runtime libraries" ... )
13.02.2013 - Capivara_LK_0.09a01a- UCi -32-bit & 64-bit - Re-Builded in 16.05.2013 ( Compilada a partir do MS Visual Studio 2010. Você precisará usar a "Visual Cruntime libraries" ... )
You are good to go now, my friend! Opponents of Capivara beware! Appreciate you taking care of the fix. Now I can test it!
All I am waiting on now is to be sure which of these 2 you prefer I use.
I had another thought- they just inexplicably enter my mind every now and then. No idea where in hell they come from. Not to be confused with revelations.
Would you like to tell me if you prefer I use "a01a" or "a02a", or would you like me to find out for you which is the stronger of the 2? It won't take 1000 games- trust me.
laoliveirajr wrote:I'm still in my work ...
In a few hours, when I get home, I will make a new re-build these two versions, and I will republish them.
Why?? There doesn't seem to be a problem, and they work great. (If it aint broke- don't fix it)
george
Yes, I corrected the problem of hash ...
But when I compiled, some codes had already in "b01a" and "b02a" versions ... ... ... what was published there not be a re-build, so I have to return some files to the oldest code, to do the rebuild ...
(What was published yesterday (dawn today) should be labeled as "b01a" and "b02 a")
laoliveirajr wrote:I'm still in my work ...
In a few hours, when I get home, I will make a new re-build these two versions, and I will republish them.
Why?? There doesn't seem to be a problem, and they work great. (If it aint broke- don't fix it)
george
Yes, I corrected the problem of hash ...
But when I compiled, some codes had already in "b01a" and "b02a" versions ... ... ... what was published there not be a re-build, so I have to return some files to the oldest code, to do the rebuild ...
(What was published yesterday (dawn today) should be labeled as "b01a" and "b02 a")
I just saw what was wrong, after to have it published, but I had no time to fix it (I slept less than four hours before coming to work ...)
laoliveirajr wrote:I'm still in my work ...
In a few hours, when I get home, I will make a new re-build these two versions, and I will republish them.
Why?? There doesn't seem to be a problem, and they work great. (If it aint broke- don't fix it)
george
Yes, I corrected the problem of hash ...
But when I compiled, some codes had already in "b01a" and "b02a" versions ... ... ... what was published there not be a re-build, so I have to return some files to the oldest code, to do the rebuild ...
(What was published yesterday (dawn today) should be labeled as "b01a" and "b02 a")
Done !!!
I made a one more small fix today.
CapivaraLK009a01a and CapivaraLK009a02a versions were recompiled,
and are re-published now at: vivaxadrez.wikispaces.com/Capivara
13.02.2013 - Capivara_LK_0.09a02a - UCi - 32-bit & 64-bit - 2nd Re-Builded in 16.05.2013 ( Compilada a partir do MS Visual Studio 2010. Você precisará usar a "Visual C runtime libraries" ... )
13.02.2013 - Capivara_LK_0.09a01a- UCi -32-bit & 64-bit - 2nd Re-Builded in 16.05.2013 ( Compilada a partir do MS Visual Studio 2010. Você precisará usar a "Visual Cruntime libraries" ... )
