For ZACH WEGNER

Discussion of anything and everything relating to chess playing software and machines.

Moderator: Ras

User avatar
Zach Wegner
Posts: 1922
Joined: Thu Mar 09, 2006 12:51 am
Location: Earth

Re: For ZACH WEGNER

Post by Zach Wegner »

geots wrote:That was never the point, Ryan.
Then what is it George?

I'm still expecting a PM or an email with all of this... well, I'm not exactly sure what it is. But I am waiting...
swami
Posts: 6659
Joined: Thu Mar 09, 2006 4:21 am

Re: For ZACH WEGNER

Post by swami »

geots wrote:
swami wrote:
geots wrote:
swami wrote:
Terry McCracken wrote:Zack you're a brilliantly talented young man, you needn't concern yourself over empty rhetoric.

Terry
I agree, Zach has released the pretty decent open source program, and has been reasonable so far.

he doesn't deserve empty threats from some people who claim "imaginary" or "so-called anonymous" friend-programmers told them about his code offline. It's just pure utter nonsense.
I assure you they are not "imaginary"- about as far as you can get from that. Personally- i dont see anything wrong with: You attack my friend with foolish crap- prepare to be attacked yourself.
First: I don't know who these people are.

Second: How can I attack them If I don't know their names? or without knowing if it is true? It's not an attack.

Swami- you missed my point. I was referring to the attack on Vas when i made the above statement about "attack- be attacked"
Hi George,

Sorry for misunderstanding, but I don't see any attack on Vas's character although I have not read all of the posts, What I read so far are concerning the similarities of 2 engines, Mods have agreed to post the sticky notice "discussion is fine, libel not", so they must surely allow these discussion about similarities in code, no?
User avatar
geots
Posts: 4790
Joined: Sat Mar 11, 2006 12:42 am

Re: For ZACH WEGNER

Post by geots »

swami wrote:
geots wrote:
swami wrote:
geots wrote:
swami wrote:
Terry McCracken wrote:Zack you're a brilliantly talented young man, you needn't concern yourself over empty rhetoric.

Terry
I agree, Zach has released the pretty decent open source program, and has been reasonable so far.

he doesn't deserve empty threats from some people who claim "imaginary" or "so-called anonymous" friend-programmers told them about his code offline. It's just pure utter nonsense.
I assure you they are not "imaginary"- about as far as you can get from that. Personally- i dont see anything wrong with: You attack my friend with foolish crap- prepare to be attacked yourself.
First: I don't know who these people are.

Second: How can I attack them If I don't know their names? or without knowing if it is true? It's not an attack.

Swami- you missed my point. I was referring to the attack on Vas when i made the above statement about "attack- be attacked"
Hi George,

Sorry for misunderstanding, but I don't see any attack on Vas's character although I have not read all of the posts, What I read so far are concerning the similarities of 2 engines, Mods have agreed to post the sticky notice "discussion is fine, libel not", so they must surely allow these discussion about similarities in code, no?

Swami, that is far from the issue as i see it. It has been stated more than once that the evidence is not fully there yet, but still being worked on. And it has gone so far as to have been said by Zach that it could go either way , IHO. Swami- it just doesnt work that way. FIRST- present your evidence- ALL you have. That is the starting point. Then you go from there. If the evidence is not ready, you dont drag someones commercial program thru the mud for 6 days while preparing this "so called " evidence.
User avatar
geots
Posts: 4790
Joined: Sat Mar 11, 2006 12:42 am

Re: For ZACH WEGNER

Post by geots »

Zach Wegner wrote:
geots wrote:That was never the point, Ryan.
Then what is it George?

I'm still expecting a PM or an email with all of this... well, I'm not exactly sure what it is. But I am waiting...
Hell you got me all hung up here. Im still trying to absorb your last mail and how im supposed to apologize to myself. :lol:
bob
Posts: 20943
Joined: Mon Feb 27, 2006 7:30 pm
Location: Birmingham, AL

Re: For ZACH WEGNER

Post by bob »

geots wrote:
Zach Wegner wrote:And by the way, I invite EVERYONE, especially programmers, to look through my code. It's easily visible online, no need to download anything: http://zct.cvs.sourceforge.net/zct/zct/
I promise you that you do not want to hear what they told me on a public forum.
I'm pretty sure we don't want to hear anything they have to say on any forum. But not for the reason you are implying...

Sic 'em on my code next, that ought to be good for a laugh, once the "professionals" figure out what I do and how, which might keep 'em busy for a while.
bob
Posts: 20943
Joined: Mon Feb 27, 2006 7:30 pm
Location: Birmingham, AL

Re: For ZACH WEGNER

Post by bob »

Zach Wegner wrote:
geots wrote:That was never the point, Ryan.
Then what is it George?

I'm still expecting a PM or an email with all of this... well, I'm not exactly sure what it is. But I am waiting...
Zach:

First rule of message boards, "do not feed the trolls". I know we all get sucked into it, but if you stop feeding them, they die and don't bother anyone any more...
User avatar
geots
Posts: 4790
Joined: Sat Mar 11, 2006 12:42 am

Re: For ZACH WEGNER

Post by geots »

bob wrote:
Zach Wegner wrote:
geots wrote:That was never the point, Ryan.
Then what is it George?

I'm still expecting a PM or an email with all of this... well, I'm not exactly sure what it is. But I am waiting...
Zach:

First rule of message boards, "do not feed the trolls". I know we all get sucked into it, but if you stop feeding them, they die and don't bother anyone any more...
I wasnt going to really bring this up, but since you are calling me a "troll"- i think i have the right to say that you are the one person on this forum i have absolutley zero use for- will never have any use for- and thank God you feel the same way.
User avatar
geots
Posts: 4790
Joined: Sat Mar 11, 2006 12:42 am

Re: For ZACH WEGNER

Post by geots »

bob wrote:
geots wrote:
Zach Wegner wrote:And by the way, I invite EVERYONE, especially programmers, to look through my code. It's easily visible online, no need to download anything: http://zct.cvs.sourceforge.net/zct/zct/
I promise you that you do not want to hear what they told me on a public forum.
I'm pretty sure we don't want to hear anything they have to say on any forum. But not for the reason you are implying...

Sic 'em on my code next, that ought to be good for a laugh, once the "professionals" figure out what I do and how, which might keep 'em busy for a while.

Rybka- 30 Crafty- 0 Exactly who would care about your code :lol: :lol:
Ryan Benitez
Posts: 719
Joined: Thu Mar 09, 2006 1:21 am
Location: Portland Oregon

Re: For ZACH WEGNER

Post by Ryan Benitez »

geots wrote:
bob wrote:
geots wrote:
Zach Wegner wrote:And by the way, I invite EVERYONE, especially programmers, to look through my code. It's easily visible online, no need to download anything: http://zct.cvs.sourceforge.net/zct/zct/
I promise you that you do not want to hear what they told me on a public forum.
I'm pretty sure we don't want to hear anything they have to say on any forum. But not for the reason you are implying...

Sic 'em on my code next, that ought to be good for a laugh, once the "professionals" figure out what I do and how, which might keep 'em busy for a while.
Rybka- 30 Crafty- 0 Exactly who would care about your code :lol: :lol:
Almost every programmer including the one who wrote the program you are comparing it to has studied Crafty. I am not 100% sure what Prof. Hyatts goal is with Crafty but the reality is that it is used as a learning tool for most programmers in computer chess.
User avatar
Zach Wegner
Posts: 1922
Joined: Thu Mar 09, 2006 12:51 am
Location: Earth

Re: For ZACH WEGNER

Post by Zach Wegner »

geots wrote:Hell you got me all hung up here. Im still trying to absorb your last mail and how im supposed to apologize to myself. :lol:
Hmph. Still waiting George.