Thoughts...

Discussion of anything and everything relating to chess playing software and machines.

Moderator: Ras

User avatar
Rolf
Posts: 6081
Joined: Fri Mar 10, 2006 11:14 pm
Location: Munster, Nuremberg, Princeton

Re: Thoughts...

Post by Rolf »

bob wrote:
Rolf wrote:Thoughts?

I agree with a single idea in your post and that is the fact that commercials like Fritz, Junior, Shredder etc. never were reverse engineered like Rybka. The only reason for that fact is that all the above have money behind them (ChessBase money) while Rybka is such a pain in the ___ of the antique former winner guys that it's blew their minds and made them believe that Rybka must be a cheat (from Fruit) because how otherwise someone could have found something they all had missed for years.

Tiger author Theron once wrote here in CCC that if he would forget about morals and would steal from Fruit then he could achive the same what Rajlich had achieved, but he, Theron, would have morals... When that had appeared I was outraged because of the unproven dirt. It has never been proven since then and Vas never was taken to court for anything.

Again, also then Theron never was interested in Fritz or Junior. So you ask a bit for too much if you claim now that therefore also your I____ should remain alive.

The reason why decent people in the community condemned these clones,

1) Vas is a integer character who never lied or pretended sonmething false

2) The evil of such inventions like Strelka or others is NOT only the clone stuff, it's that then this was published open in public so that more and more the secrets of Vas code became known. NB that the code of Fritz and others never was mistreated this way. You criticise it but the reason is money.

3) The talents who mistreat Rybka all along do not plan to have their own product in championships or tests, the sole purpose is the mistreatment of Rybka and its author. Unfortunately a lot of famous guys in CCC have helped that sort of campaign and I was among a few who criticised that from its beginning.

After 5 years to me it seems as if Rajlich is a saint because he's smart, but others are also smart, but he has the morals, the ethics and the philosophy to take such negative incidents with the patience of a wise monk who doesnt want to let himself be disturbed in pursuing his own path.
A couple of questions. Why do you need to bring Theron's name into the discussion? He has not participated in this thread.
What you did and Zach Wegner, that was science in trying to understand what Rybka did. Such approach is ok for scientists. But what people here continue to do, see Nick but also many others, that is using terms like lying, cheating etc. against Vas and Rybkat. And such isnt ok. Now the one who first started the hate campaign against Vas was Theron. No doubt about it. Therefore I mentioned him. Not to rehash something. If you order that this isnt allowed to mention then this is ok. But why others are allowed to insult Vasik with his Rybka.

It would be a real progress if you could make a statement that what appeared with Rybka1 beta, that was a free version to chosen email friends who registered and asked for it. That was a pilot study so to speak and that is allowed. Later Vasik stated exactly whom he relied on, learned from, also Crafty. Vas wasnt amoral when he learned from Fruit. He didnt take code from Fruit for the chess relevant parts. It was from just technical stuff as I understood - which is done by everybody. When Vas sold his versions, there was nothing from Fruit at all.

BTW nobody else learned from Fruit and made a software as strong as Rybka what proves that Vasik is the best of all.


Why do you want to continue to praise Vas as a victimized saint? There is no doubt that parts of fruit are in Rybka 1. Absolutely no doubt. Whether they remain in R2 and R3 (or even R4) is a guess, but not for R1. And that is certainly something that is not considered reasonable.
What parts do you mean? What do you mean with victimized saint? For me he's a saint because his temper is so calm and controlled and positive. He doesnt insult other people even if they insulted him. That's already something. Victimized means what? He's unfairlay prosecuted with the first insult that he acted without a moral (Theron). He's no victimized something, he's doing quite well and he's not suffering, he's rather ignoring the hate. Other than myself he thinks that he should ignore something that he cannot change. I myself still believe in the possible change in people after they read some good arguments.

Note that nobody ever dared to take Vas to court which proves that he didnt do something wrong. Shouldnt we therefore stop the hate campaign in CCC?
How about contributing positive stuff, or else not contributing at all, so that our moderator email doesn't get choked up with complaints about your posts? You rehash either the rybka/fruit issue, or the deep blue issue, over and over and over. Rybka/Fruit genie is out of the bottle. Time to move on. Deep Blue hasn't existed for 12 years now. Time to move on there as well. Your continual complaints are not going to change either of those situations.
Couldnt we join in agreement over letting undiscussed the many evil deeds overall? My positive science contribution is to point out that DB2 vs Kasparov is not allowed while Vasik apparently is allowed to be insulted as a cheat. But it wasnt a cheat as far as I could understand.

Please do not persecute people who just defend those who are unfairly attacked like Vas if you tolerate that clone creators are writing here like Strelka author Osipov.

You criticise me but isnt he a real threat against our community?

It would be really nice to see that academic seniors like me are treated with respect. I didnt open the Rybka is cheating threads. I came by to give some comments. Because you dont protect the actual champion, you are only protecting your friends of the DB2 IBM team against Kasparov, another human champion. That is the problem.
Last edited by Rolf on Fri Nov 13, 2009 12:00 am, edited 1 time in total.
-Popper and Lakatos are good but I'm stuck on Leibowitz
Osipov Jury
Posts: 186
Joined: Mon Jan 21, 2008 2:07 pm
Location: Russia

Re: Thoughts...

Post by Osipov Jury »

Yes, it's ridiculous, we have:

1.It is easy to prove.
2.It is very difficult and long.

On this subject, easy to talk with a good programmer, but it is difficult to talk about it with a cheerleader.
User avatar
Rolf
Posts: 6081
Joined: Fri Mar 10, 2006 11:14 pm
Location: Munster, Nuremberg, Princeton

Re: Thoughts...

Post by Rolf »

Osipov Jury wrote:
It is very difficult and long. And the main thing - it is incorrect to the author of Rybka.
Jury, hi!

Why?? When you had no qualms in creating Strelka with open code? I dont understand fully your motivation. Isnt there a contradiction in your behavior?
-Popper and Lakatos are good but I'm stuck on Leibowitz
gerold
Posts: 10121
Joined: Thu Mar 09, 2006 12:57 am
Location: van buren,missouri

Re: Thoughts...

Post by gerold »

Osipov Jury wrote:Yes, it's ridiculous, we have:

1.It is easy to prove.
2.It is very difficult and long.

On this subject, easy to talk with a good programmer, but it is difficult to talk about it with a cheerleader.
DO you have any proof that the program is a clone or any proof
that it is not a clone.

Very best to you.

Gerold.
Osipov Jury
Posts: 186
Joined: Mon Jan 21, 2008 2:07 pm
Location: Russia

Re: Thoughts...

Post by Osipov Jury »

gerold wrote: DO you have any proof that the program is a clone or any proof
that it is not a clone.
I have the proof:
1. Ippolit is a clone of Rybka.
2. It is not a clone of Rybka 3, it is a clone of next version of Rybka.
3. It can not be the result of reverse engeneering. It was made from original sources of Rybka.
mjlef
Posts: 1494
Joined: Thu Mar 30, 2006 2:08 pm

Re: Thoughts...

Post by mjlef »

Osipov Jury wrote:
gerold wrote: DO you have any proof that the program is a clone or any proof
that it is not a clone.
I have the proof:
1. Ippolit is a clone of Rybka.
2. It is not a clone of Rybka 3, it is a clone of next version of Rybka.
3. It can not be the result of reverse engeneering. It was made from original sources of Rybka.
wow! Does this mean the sources were:

a. stolen
b. lost or accidently given out by Vas
c. given out on purpose?
d. perhaps released by someone he trusted?

I was assuming it was more or less reverse engineered by people looking at some executable.
Uri Blass
Posts: 10794
Joined: Thu Mar 09, 2006 12:37 am
Location: Tel-Aviv Israel

Re: Thoughts...

Post by Uri Blass »

mjlef wrote:
Osipov Jury wrote:
gerold wrote: DO you have any proof that the program is a clone or any proof
that it is not a clone.
I have the proof:
1. Ippolit is a clone of Rybka.
2. It is not a clone of Rybka 3, it is a clone of next version of Rybka.
3. It can not be the result of reverse engeneering. It was made from original sources of Rybka.
wow! Does this mean the sources were:

a. stolen
b. lost or accidently given out by Vas
c. given out on purpose?
d. perhaps released by someone he trusted?

I was assuming it was more or less reverse engineered by people looking at some executable.
I do not know but if one option out of a,b,c,d is correct then
I guess that it is not c.

Uri
gerold
Posts: 10121
Joined: Thu Mar 09, 2006 12:57 am
Location: van buren,missouri

Re: Thoughts...

Post by gerold »

Osipov Jury wrote:
gerold wrote: DO you have any proof that the program is a clone or any proof
that it is not a clone.
I have the proof:
1. Ippolit is a clone of Rybka.
2. It is not a clone of Rybka 3, it is a clone of next version of Rybka.
3. It can not be the result of reverse engeneering. It was made from original sources of Rybka.
Thank you very much.

Best.

Gerold.
User avatar
slobo
Posts: 2331
Joined: Mon Apr 09, 2007 5:36 pm

Re: Thoughts...

Post by slobo »

Alexander Schmidt wrote:
Rolf wrote:1) Vas is a integer character who never lied.
Then he is quite unique on the world :D

Do you know him very well? Is he liveing in your neighbourhood?
Rolf believe him.
Something religion-like I´d say.

Generaly speaking, it´s difficult to discuss religion with others.
"Well, I´m just a soul whose intentions are good,
Oh Lord, please don´t let me be misunderstood."
Nimzovik
Posts: 1831
Joined: Sat Jan 06, 2007 11:08 pm

Re: Thoughts...

Post by Nimzovik »

My 2Cents: 1) There is sufficient amount of eloquent debate with what seems to me ( an total non programmer) to present legitimate doubt as to whether the unmentionable program is an actual clone. Therefore I have attempted to aquire same with some (see below) success. IF it proves to be a clone in the Moral sense then I shall remove it immediately. Until then.............. :wink: I note that comparing The Rybka 3 engine and using the Unmentionable engine as a kibitzer in Fritz 11 Gui there are variances in the the respective engines evals and responses with equal RAM and time. I also note that It is unstable on my system. I can not get it to perform in the manner that other engines do. It will not function in shootout mode and other issues (crashes, etc) This is frustrating. Several writers here have made many valid points. There is indeed definitely much predjudice and besmirching that is needlessly ( almost) uncivilized I dare say......