the forum got tired of my constant evaluation posts.Frank Quisinsky wrote:Hi Lyudmil,
but good ...
Give the programmers the material ... you do that in the past (good).
So long we have ideas and material to make it better so long all is fully OK.
Best
Frank
having good eval/search is a good start, but the most difficult thing is how to tune your parameters. if an engine has 2 terms, it can gain 2 elo by tuning them, if it has 5 terms, it can gain 5 elo, with 100 terms - 100 elo, with 500 - 500 elo. so, good to have more terms, but very difficult to tune.
currently I have eval at least twice better ( but not necessarily longer) than anything I have posted here in the past, and it gets improving with every new game I see, but we will see what comes out of it.
at some point, certainly though, sooner or later, I will provide the community with a refined evaluation update, unless by that time chess has been solved or SF breaks the 5000 elo mark.
