I agree with Sam's assessment of that position.BubbaTough wrote:I don't have a board in front of me, but here is what I had on the ...a5 and then ....a4 idea (boy, its getting to be a pain to scroll back in the thread to quote myself):Christopher Conkie wrote:17. Bc5 gets 17.......Ra5!! and we have equalised (or are even in front).Graham Banks wrote:15......a5; 16.Rfd1, a4; 17.Bc5 could still be troublesome if you look further at it.Christopher Conkie wrote: I doubt it will play Rfd1 if we play a5. I could be wrong but I do doubt it highly. If (and it is a big if) we got Rfd1 then a4 straight away.
Most likely is that we get Bc5 however.
Christopher
Christopher
If memory serves, the b pawn looked pretty annoying in this position (after axb axb). If Chris and folks can find a way to get ....a5, ....a4 to work without some preliminary work I am all for it. I couldn't find it.15...a5 16. Bd3 g6 17. Qg4 and I am not sure what to do for black here. 17...a4 is met with 18 b4, but I don't see much better.
-Sam
CCC Practice Game
Moderator: Ras
-
- Posts: 44323
- Joined: Sun Feb 26, 2006 10:52 am
- Location: Auckland, NZ
Re: How to beat the TASC R30 (1993)
gbanksnz at gmail.com
-
- Posts: 638
- Joined: Thu Aug 30, 2007 8:23 pm
- Location: San Juan, Puerto Rico
Re: How to beat the TASC R30 (1993)
Sam if 17...a4 18 b4 runs into 18...axb4 e.p. Rxb4 (there is no white pawn in a3) and Rxa2 we recover the pawn in a good position.BubbaTough wrote:If memory serves, the b pawn looked pretty annoying in this position (after axb axb). If Chris and folks can find a way to get ....a5, ....a4 to work without some preliminary work I am all for it. I couldn't find it.15...a5 16. Bd3 g6 17. Qg4 and I am not sure what to do for black here. 17...a4 is met with 18 b4, but I don't see much better.
-Sam
-
- Posts: 6074
- Joined: Sat Apr 01, 2006 9:34 pm
- Location: Scotland
Lousy
http://www.talkchess.com/forum/viewtopi ... 79&t=28922Graham Banks wrote:I agree with Sam's assessment of that position.BubbaTough wrote:I don't have a board in front of me, but here is what I had on the ...a5 and then ....a4 idea (boy, its getting to be a pain to scroll back in the thread to quote myself):Christopher Conkie wrote:17. Bc5 gets 17.......Ra5!! and we have equalised (or are even in front).Graham Banks wrote:15......a5; 16.Rfd1, a4; 17.Bc5 could still be troublesome if you look further at it.Christopher Conkie wrote: I doubt it will play Rfd1 if we play a5. I could be wrong but I do doubt it highly. If (and it is a big if) we got Rfd1 then a4 straight away.
Most likely is that we get Bc5 however.
Christopher
Christopher
If memory serves, the b pawn looked pretty annoying in this position (after axb axb). If Chris and folks can find a way to get ....a5, ....a4 to work without some preliminary work I am all for it. I couldn't find it.15...a5 16. Bd3 g6 17. Qg4 and I am not sure what to do for black here. 17...a4 is met with 18 b4, but I don't see much better.
-Sam
Perhaps you also did not see this?
I told Steve to make separate threads for each move.
Imagine if the game goes 100 moves.
Anyway......Bc5 is very good for us in that line.
Christopher
-
- Posts: 44323
- Joined: Sun Feb 26, 2006 10:52 am
- Location: Auckland, NZ
Re: How to beat the TASC R30 (1993)
17.....a4; 18.b4, ab; 19.ab is okay Tano-Urayoan.tano-urayoan wrote:Sam if 17...a4 18 b4 runs into 18...axb4 e.p. Rxb4 (there is no white pawn in a3) and Rxa2 we recover the pawn in a good position.BubbaTough wrote:If memory serves, the b pawn looked pretty annoying in this position (after axb axb). If Chris and folks can find a way to get ....a5, ....a4 to work without some preliminary work I am all for it. I couldn't find it.15...a5 16. Bd3 g6 17. Qg4 and I am not sure what to do for black here. 17...a4 is met with 18 b4, but I don't see much better.
-Sam
gbanksnz at gmail.com
-
- Posts: 638
- Joined: Thu Aug 30, 2007 8:23 pm
- Location: San Juan, Puerto Rico
Re: How to beat the TASC R30 (1993)
[d] r2q1rk1/p2p2pp/2b1pb2/7Q/8/4B3/PPP1BPPP/1R3RK1 bGraham Banks wrote:17.....a4; 18.b4, ab; 19.ab is okay Tano-Urayoan.
Ok this is the position if 15...a5 16.Bd3 g6 17.Qg4 a 4 18. b4 axb4 e.p. 19. Rxb4 Rxa2.
There is no way for white to play axb4 after black played axb4. White could only recapture with it is rook in b1
-
- Posts: 44323
- Joined: Sun Feb 26, 2006 10:52 am
- Location: Auckland, NZ
Re: Lousy
Yes I saw that, but Sam is talking Bd3 rather than Rfd1.Christopher Conkie wrote: http://www.talkchess.com/forum/viewtopi ... 79&t=28922
Perhaps you also did not see this?
Anyway......Bc5 is very good for us in that line.
Christopher
15.....a5; 16.Bd3, g6; 17.Qg4, a4; 18.b4 is his line.
gbanksnz at gmail.com
-
- Posts: 6074
- Joined: Sat Apr 01, 2006 9:34 pm
- Location: Scotland
Re: How to beat the TASC R30 (1993)
OK for who? Us? Yes it is because we then play Qe7. If then b4 we play Ra4!Graham Banks wrote:17.....a4; 18.b4, ab; 19.ab is okay Tano-Urayoan.tano-urayoan wrote:Sam if 17...a4 18 b4 runs into 18...axb4 e.p. Rxb4 (there is no white pawn in a3) and Rxa2 we recover the pawn in a good position.BubbaTough wrote:If memory serves, the b pawn looked pretty annoying in this position (after axb axb). If Chris and folks can find a way to get ....a5, ....a4 to work without some preliminary work I am all for it. I couldn't find it.15...a5 16. Bd3 g6 17. Qg4 and I am not sure what to do for black here. 17...a4 is met with 18 b4, but I don't see much better.
-Sam
Christopher
-
- Posts: 44323
- Joined: Sun Feb 26, 2006 10:52 am
- Location: Auckland, NZ
Re: How to beat the TASC R30 (1993)
The en passant capture is made on b3, so the White a-pawn can recapture. I'm thinking that you're misunderstanding the en passant rule.tano-urayoan wrote:[d] r2q1rk1/p2p2pp/2b1pb2/7Q/8/4B3/PPP1BPPP/1R3RK1 bGraham Banks wrote:17.....a4; 18.b4, ab; 19.ab is okay Tano-Urayoan.
Ok this is the position if 15...a5 16.Bd3 g6 17.Qg4 a 4 18. b4 axb4 e.p. 19. Rxb4 Rxa2.
There is no way for white to play axb4 after black played axb4. White could only recapture with it is rook in b1
gbanksnz at gmail.com
-
- Posts: 6074
- Joined: Sat Apr 01, 2006 9:34 pm
- Location: Scotland
Re: Lousy
http://www.talkchess.com/forum/viewtopi ... 99&t=28922Graham Banks wrote:Yes I saw that, but Sam is talking Bd3 rather than Rfd1.Christopher Conkie wrote: http://www.talkchess.com/forum/viewtopi ... 79&t=28922
Perhaps you also did not see this?
Anyway......Bc5 is very good for us in that line.
Christopher
15.....a5; 16.Bd3, g6; 17.Qg4, a4; 18.b4 is his line.
Roll on move 17.

Christopher
-
- Posts: 638
- Joined: Thu Aug 30, 2007 8:23 pm
- Location: San Juan, Puerto Rico
Re: How to beat the TASC R30 (1993)
yeah my fault, just playing out in the mind.