Graham Banks wrote:
Thrust Of The Spike 4CPU
Moderator: Ras
-
Vinvin
- Posts: 5312
- Joined: Thu Mar 09, 2006 9:40 am
- Full name: Vincent Lejeune
Re: Statistics
So, 1.g4 seems very bad for white !?
-
Graham Banks
- Posts: 45248
- Joined: Sun Feb 26, 2006 10:52 am
- Location: Auckland, NZ
Re: Statistics
A lot worse than I expected, that's for sure!Vinvin wrote:So, 1.g4 seems very bad for white !?
Graham Banks wrote:
gbanksnz at gmail.com
-
jdart
- Posts: 4420
- Joined: Fri Mar 10, 2006 5:23 am
- Location: http://www.arasanchess.org
Re: Statistics
Does the tournament shed light on what is the best defense for Black?
I noticed the unusual line 1. g4 d5 2. Bg2 Nc6 (or 1. g4 Nc6 2. Bg2 d5) seemed to be quite ok.
--Jon
I noticed the unusual line 1. g4 d5 2. Bg2 Nc6 (or 1. g4 Nc6 2. Bg2 d5) seemed to be quite ok.
--Jon
-
Graham Banks
- Posts: 45248
- Joined: Sun Feb 26, 2006 10:52 am
- Location: Auckland, NZ
Re: Statistics
I've not experimented yet with trying to build an openings tree from the pgn, although Albert did explain how to do so.jdart wrote:Does the tournament shed light on what is the best defense for Black?
I noticed the unusual line 1. g4 d5 2. Bg2 Nc6 (or 1. g4 Nc6 2. Bg2 d5) seemed to be quite ok.
--Jon
I got the impression that White has little success against 1.g4 d5 2.Bg2 Bxg4 though.
gbanksnz at gmail.com
-
drbob
- Posts: 18
- Joined: Tue Oct 30, 2012 7:29 am
Re: Statistics
Pretty exciting stuff, Graham. It was fun following along. Thanks for the herculean effort.
Robert
Robert
drbob
-
Graham Banks
- Posts: 45248
- Joined: Sun Feb 26, 2006 10:52 am
- Location: Auckland, NZ
Re: Statistics
You're welcome Robert. Glad you enjoyed it.drbob wrote:Pretty exciting stuff, Graham. It was fun following along. Thanks for the herculean effort.
Robert
gbanksnz at gmail.com
