Hi Ferdinand,
I can try it out in the night.
Only minutes at home ...
Very interesting, Looks again good!
Later ...
Best
Frank
I need a new tool ... maybe for Ferdinand / Norm!?
Moderator: Ras
-
Frank Quisinsky
- Posts: 7516
- Joined: Wed Nov 18, 2009 7:16 pm
- Location: Gutweiler, Germany
- Full name: Frank Quisinsky
-
Ferdy
- Posts: 4856
- Joined: Sun Aug 10, 2008 3:15 pm
- Location: Philippines
Re: Online with description on my news page.
New version, this one needs pgn-extract-17-14.exe or pgn-extract-17-19.exe. You can enter by player too, to get all data of all engines that start at S, use S*, could be Senpai, Stockfish, Smarthink, Spark.
Download:
http://www.mediafire.com/download/vybde ... ryv2.4.rar
Download:
http://www.mediafire.com/download/vybde ... ryv2.4.rar
-
jpqy
- Posts: 556
- Joined: Thu Apr 24, 2008 9:31 am
- Location: Belgium
Re: Online with description on my news page.
Hi Ferdinand,
I tried your last version..at the moment i can only let it works with using Full name off a engine..so just using K or Komodo is not enough and doesn't work for me..
I tried first with player name K
Then Komodo
gives me 0 games..when using full name then i get data output!
PNGS v2.4 (Player number of games summary)
Enter pgn filename? i3M380.pgn
Enter minimum moves? 20
Enter maximum moves? 50
Enter player names option (all, indi)? indi
1. Enter player name (stop to exit)? Komodo
2. Enter player name (stop to exit)? stop
Enter game end results (all, mate, mate_and_draw)? all
Filtering player names ...
Creating player data ...
Total filtered games: 0
output: i3M380_player_numgames_summary.txt
time: 1.25s
Done!!
press enter key to exit
I tried your last version..at the moment i can only let it works with using Full name off a engine..so just using K or Komodo is not enough and doesn't work for me..
I tried first with player name K
Then Komodo
gives me 0 games..when using full name then i get data output!
PNGS v2.4 (Player number of games summary)
Enter pgn filename? i3M380.pgn
Enter minimum moves? 20
Enter maximum moves? 50
Enter player names option (all, indi)? indi
1. Enter player name (stop to exit)? Komodo
2. Enter player name (stop to exit)? stop
Enter game end results (all, mate, mate_and_draw)? all
Filtering player names ...
Creating player data ...
Total filtered games: 0
output: i3M380_player_numgames_summary.txt
time: 1.25s
Done!!
press enter key to exit
-
Ferdy
- Posts: 4856
- Joined: Sun Aug 10, 2008 3:15 pm
- Location: Philippines
Re: Online with description on my news page.
Use K* to extract all engines that start in letter K, S* to get Stockfish, Senpai, Spark for example.jpqy wrote:Hi Ferdinand,
I tried your last version..at the moment i can only let it works with using Full name off a engine..so just using K or Komodo is not enough and doesn't work for me..
I tried first with player name K
Then Komodo
gives me 0 games..when using full name then i get data output!
PNGS v2.4 (Player number of games summary)
Enter pgn filename? i3M380.pgn
Enter minimum moves? 20
Enter maximum moves? 50
Enter player names option (all, indi)? indi
1. Enter player name (stop to exit)? Komodo
2. Enter player name (stop to exit)? stop
Enter game end results (all, mate, mate_and_draw)? all
Filtering player names ...
Creating player data ...
Total filtered games: 0
output: i3M380_player_numgames_summary.txt
time: 1.25s
Done!!
press enter key to exit
Here is an example from my other previous post.
Code: Select all
PNGS v2.4 (Player number of games summary)
Enter pgn filename? fcp-rating-list-60950.pgn
Enter minimum moves? 20
Enter maximum moves? 50
Enter player names option [all, indi]? indi
1. Enter player name [stop to exit]? Stoc*
2. Enter player name [stop to exit]? Komo*
3. Enter player name [stop to exit]? Han*
4. Enter player name [stop to exit]? stop
Enter game end results [all, mate, mate_and_draw]? mate_and_draw -
jpqy
- Posts: 556
- Joined: Thu Apr 24, 2008 9:31 am
- Location: Belgium
Re: Online with description on my news page.
Yes..now it works perfect
I need to use K* in place off k*
So i have Stockfishes who are named with : stockfish or Stockfish or starting with SF or sf
Then i can't get them together in one time?!
Is this a challenge or i asking too much or you just like it and want more
It's already great..is to see how far you want or can go with your tool..
Best regards,
JP.
I need to use K* in place off k*
So i have Stockfishes who are named with : stockfish or Stockfish or starting with SF or sf
Then i can't get them together in one time?!
Is this a challenge or i asking too much or you just like it and want more
It's already great..is to see how far you want or can go with your tool..
Best regards,
JP.
-
Ferdy
- Posts: 4856
- Joined: Sun Aug 10, 2008 3:15 pm
- Location: Philippines
Re: Online with description on my news page.
You can get them in one time, just usejpqy wrote:Yes..now it works perfect
I need to use K* in place off k*
So i have Stockfishes who are named with : stockfish or Stockfish or starting with SF or sf
Then i can't get them together in one time?!
Is this a challenge or i asking too much or you just like it and want more
It's already great..is to see how far you want or can go with your tool..
Best regards,
JP.
indi, then K*, then k*, then sto*, then St*, then SF* then sf*.
-
Frank Quisinsky
- Posts: 7516
- Joined: Wed Nov 18, 2009 7:16 pm
- Location: Gutweiler, Germany
- Full name: Frank Quisinsky
Re: Small mistake and an other criteria for output file
Hi Ferdinand,
I added some infos in my News 158.
I think you have a small error in your new version.
If I start version 2.4
- move 20-49
- won games only
If I am looking in your statistic output file ... I missed for selection C and D
the first three places. Summary started with place 4:
Selection C and D
Have a look here ...
All is wonderful again but one wish I have here ...
Summary in selection "B" should be sorted with other criteria.
Have a look in my News 158 ... and the Spark 1.0 x64 results.
With such stats Spark should be under the TOP-10 with won / lost games and move number 30-49!
Easy I think ...
Engine with most "all wins in %" should be on the first position in summary in selection "B". So it's more easy to see here most important information for people which like opening book analyzes (very important for myself).
Best
Frank
PS: I like it so much ... a dream for myself what you do here!
Sorry for my late answer: Can't work on my page (webhosting Company is working on FTP Server), and a lot of private work these days. Hope up to end of this week only, means my private work.
I added some infos in my News 158.
I think you have a small error in your new version.
If I start version 2.4
- move 20-49
- won games only
If I am looking in your statistic output file ... I missed for selection C and D
the first three places. Summary started with place 4:
Selection C and D
Have a look here ...
Code: Select all
C. FAST WHITE WINS BY MOVES AVERAGE:
Filter: 20 to 49 moves, mate games
4. Quazar 0.4 x64
CATEGORIES MOVE_AVE GAMES TOTAL GAME_RATE
white won 38 2 49 4.1%
5. Hannibal 1.5 x64
CATEGORIES MOVE_AVE GAMES TOTAL GAME_RATE
white won 39 3 56 5.4%
Code: Select all
D. FAST BLACK WINS BY MOVES AVERAGE:
Filter: 20 to 49 moves, mate games
4. Hannibal 1.5 x64
CATEGORIES MOVE_AVE GAMES TOTAL GAME_RATE
black won 31 1 75 1.3%
5. EXchess 7.51b x64
CATEGORIES MOVE_AVE GAMES TOTAL GAME_RATE
black won 38 3 43 7.0%
Summary in selection "B" should be sorted with other criteria.
Have a look in my News 158 ... and the Spark 1.0 x64 results.
With such stats Spark should be under the TOP-10 with won / lost games and move number 30-49!
Easy I think ...
Engine with most "all wins in %" should be on the first position in summary in selection "B". So it's more easy to see here most important information for people which like opening book analyzes (very important for myself).
Best
Frank
PS: I like it so much ... a dream for myself what you do here!
Sorry for my late answer: Can't work on my page (webhosting Company is working on FTP Server), and a lot of private work these days. Hope up to end of this week only, means my private work.
-
Ferdy
- Posts: 4856
- Joined: Sun Aug 10, 2008 3:15 pm
- Location: Philippines
Re: Small mistake and an other criteria for output file
This is indeed a bug. It is the starting rank number, engine is fine. This is will be fixed in V3.0, to be released just a couple of hours from now.Frank Quisinsky wrote:Hi Ferdinand,
I added some infos in my News 158.
I think you have a small error in your new version.
If I start version 2.4
- move 20-49
- won games only
If I am looking in your statistic output file ... I missed for selection C and D
the first three places. Summary started with place 4:
Selection C and D
Have a look here ...
Code: Select all
C. FAST WHITE WINS BY MOVES AVERAGE: Filter: 20 to 49 moves, mate games 4. Quazar 0.4 x64 CATEGORIES MOVE_AVE GAMES TOTAL GAME_RATE white won 38 2 49 4.1% 5. Hannibal 1.5 x64 CATEGORIES MOVE_AVE GAMES TOTAL GAME_RATE white won 39 3 56 5.4%Code: Select all
D. FAST BLACK WINS BY MOVES AVERAGE: Filter: 20 to 49 moves, mate games 4. Hannibal 1.5 x64 CATEGORIES MOVE_AVE GAMES TOTAL GAME_RATE black won 31 1 75 1.3% 5. EXchess 7.51b x64 CATEGORIES MOVE_AVE GAMES TOTAL GAME_RATE black won 38 3 43 7.0%
The purpose of section B is comparison with same engine name like the following.Frank Quisinsky wrote: All is wonderful again but one wish I have here ...
Summary in selection "B" should be sorted with other criteria.
Have a look in my News 158 ... and the Spark 1.0 x64 results.
With such stats Spark should be under the TOP-10 with won / lost games and move number 30-49!
Code: Select all
Game database: fcp-rating-list-60950.pgn
Filter: 20 to 49 moves, mate games
Total filtered games: 4298Code: Select all
B. MOVES AVERAGE AND RESULTS (sorted by player):
Filter: 20 to 49 moves, mate games
1. Andscacs 0.64 POP x64 (7+, 54=, 38-) 34.3%
CATEGORIES MOVE_AVE GAMES TOTAL GAME_RATE
all games 40 99
white won 45 4
black won 42 3
white draw 38 32
black draw 35 22
white loss 42 19
black loss 43 19
all wins 44 7 99 7.1%
all draws 37 54 99 54.5%
all loses 42 38 99 38.4%
2. Andscacs 0.70 POP x64 (3+, 58=, 21-) 39.0%
CATEGORIES MOVE_AVE GAMES TOTAL GAME_RATE
all games 39 82
white won 40 1
black won 42 2
white draw 39 28
black draw 37 30
white loss 44 9
black loss 42 12
all wins 42 3 82 3.7%
all draws 38 58 82 70.7%
all loses 43 21 82 25.6%
3. Andscacs 0.72 POP x64 (7+, 92=, 5-) 51.0%
CATEGORIES MOVE_AVE GAMES TOTAL GAME_RATE
all games 37 104
white won 45 6
black won 40 1
white draw 36 47
black draw 36 45
white loss 48 3
black loss 43 2
all wins 45 7 104 6.7%
all draws 36 92 104 88.5%
all loses 46 5 104 4.8%
4. Arasan 17.4 POP x64 (18+, 113=, 17-) 50.3%
CATEGORIES MOVE_AVE GAMES TOTAL GAME_RATE
all games 38 148
white won 42 12
black won 44 6
white draw 36 57
black draw 37 56
white loss 48 2
black loss 44 15
all wins 43 18 148 12.2%
all draws 36 113 148 76.4%
all loses 45 17 148 11.5%
5. Arasan 17.5 POP x64 (9+, 58=, 2-) 55.1%
CATEGORIES MOVE_AVE GAMES TOTAL GAME_RATE
all games 38 69
white won 43 8
black won 45 1
white draw 37 31
black draw 36 27
white loss 42 1
black loss 47 1
all wins 43 9 69 13.0%
all draws 37 58 69 84.1%
all loses 44 2 69 2.9%
6. Atlas 3.70em x64 (7+, 58=, 11-) 47.4%
CATEGORIES MOVE_AVE GAMES TOTAL GAME_RATE
all games 39 76
white won 42 5
black won 42 2
white draw 36 33
black draw 40 25
white loss 46 5
black loss 42 6
all wins 42 7 76 9.2%
all draws 38 58 76 76.3%
all loses 44 11 76 14.5%
7. Atlas 3.80 x64 (2+, 71=, 4-) 48.7%
CATEGORIES MOVE_AVE GAMES TOTAL GAME_RATE
all games 37 77
white won 44 1
black won 41 1
white draw 36 39
black draw 37 32
white loss 43 3
black loss 46 1
all wins 42 2 77 2.6%
all draws 37 71 77 92.2%
all loses 44 4 77 5.2%
8. Cheng4 0.36c x64 (22+, 104=, 12-) 53.6%
CATEGORIES MOVE_AVE GAMES TOTAL GAME_RATE
all games 38 138
white won 43 12
black won 42 10
white draw 37 57
black draw 35 47
white loss 43 4
black loss 46 8
all wins 43 22 138 15.9%
all draws 36 104 138 75.4%
all loses 45 12 138 8.7%
9. Cheng4 0.38 x64 (14+, 95=, 2-) 55.4%
CATEGORIES MOVE_AVE GAMES TOTAL GAME_RATE
all games 38 111
white won 43 11
black won 43 3
white draw 38 53
black draw 36 42
white loss 41 1
black loss 45 1
all wins 43 14 111 12.6%
all draws 37 95 111 85.6%
all loses 43 2 111 1.8%
Right in V3.0 I will add new section G to display all wins stat sorted again by lowest move average.Frank Quisinsky wrote:Easy I think ...
Engine with most "all wins in %" should be on the first position in summary in selection "B". So it's more easy to see here most important information for people which like opening book analyzes (very important for myself).
-
Ferdy
- Posts: 4856
- Joined: Sun Aug 10, 2008 3:15 pm
- Location: Philippines
Re: Small mistake and an other criteria for output file
Sample from V3.0 with section G.
Do you have other feature to request?
Code: Select all
GAME DATABASE: fcp-rating-list-60950.pgn
Filter: 20 to 49 moves, Games that ended in mate
Total filtered games: 4298Code: Select all
G. FAST ALL WINS BY MOVE AVERAGE:
Filter: 20 to 49 moves, Games that ended in mate
1. Hannibal 1.5 x64
CATEGORIES MOVE_AVE GAMES TOTAL GAME_RATE
all wins 37 4 131 3.1%
2. Quazar 0.4 x64
CATEGORIES MOVE_AVE GAMES TOTAL GAME_RATE
all wins 39 3 80 3.8%
3. ProDeo 1.87 w32
CATEGORIES MOVE_AVE GAMES TOTAL GAME_RATE
all wins 41 4 64 6.2%
4. Rodent 1.6 Build 6 POP x64
CATEGORIES MOVE_AVE GAMES TOTAL GAME_RATE
all wins 41 4 62 6.5%
5. Hiarcs 14 WCSC w32
CATEGORIES MOVE_AVE GAMES TOTAL GAME_RATE
all wins 41 48 275 17.5%
6. Protector 1.7.0 x64
CATEGORIES MOVE_AVE GAMES TOTAL GAME_RATE
all wins 42 12 126 9.5%
7. Naum 4.6 x64
CATEGORIES MOVE_AVE GAMES TOTAL GAME_RATE
all wins 42 14 95 14.7%
8. Tornado 5.0 SSE4 x64
CATEGORIES MOVE_AVE GAMES TOTAL GAME_RATE
all wins 42 8 241 3.3%
9. Andscacs 0.70 POP x64
CATEGORIES MOVE_AVE GAMES TOTAL GAME_RATE
all wins 42 3 82 3.7%
10. Crafty 24.1 SSE42 x64
CATEGORIES MOVE_AVE GAMES TOTAL GAME_RATE
all wins 42 22 175 12.6%
11. Spark 1.0 x64
CATEGORIES MOVE_AVE GAMES TOTAL GAME_RATE
all wins 42 71 326 21.8%
12. Shredder 12 x64
CATEGORIES MOVE_AVE GAMES TOTAL GAME_RATE
all wins 42 9 183 4.9%
13. OctoChess r5190 SSE4 x64
CATEGORIES MOVE_AVE GAMES TOTAL GAME_RATE
all wins 42 7 58 12.1%
14. Equinox 3.30 x64
CATEGORIES MOVE_AVE GAMES TOTAL GAME_RATE
all wins 42 18 130 13.8%
15. Rodent 1.7 Build 1 POP x64
CATEGORIES MOVE_AVE GAMES TOTAL GAME_RATE
all wins 42 8 46 17.4%
16. Atlas 3.70em x64
CATEGORIES MOVE_AVE GAMES TOTAL GAME_RATE
all wins 42 7 76 9.2%
17. SmarThink 1.70 SSE3 x64
CATEGORIES MOVE_AVE GAMES TOTAL GAME_RATE
all wins 42 17 167 10.2%
18. EXchess 7.51b x64
CATEGORIES MOVE_AVE GAMES TOTAL GAME_RATE
all wins 42 12 94 12.8%
19. Atlas 3.80 x64
CATEGORIES MOVE_AVE GAMES TOTAL GAME_RATE
all wins 42 2 77 2.6%
20. Nirvanachess 2.0a x64
CATEGORIES MOVE_AVE GAMES TOTAL GAME_RATE
all wins 43 18 140 12.9%
21. Cheng4 0.36c x64
CATEGORIES MOVE_AVE GAMES TOTAL GAME_RATE
all wins 43 22 138 15.9%
22. Junior 12.5.03 x64
CATEGORIES MOVE_AVE GAMES TOTAL GAME_RATE
all wins 43 19 109 17.4%
23. Arasan 17.4 POP x64
CATEGORIES MOVE_AVE GAMES TOTAL GAME_RATE
all wins 43 18 148 12.2%
24. Chiron 2.0 x64
CATEGORIES MOVE_AVE GAMES TOTAL GAME_RATE
all wins 43 42 238 17.6%
25. Gaviota 1.0 AVX x64
CATEGORIES MOVE_AVE GAMES TOTAL GAME_RATE
all wins 43 24 299 8.0%
26. Texel 1.04 x64
CATEGORIES MOVE_AVE GAMES TOTAL GAME_RATE
all wins 43 37 201 18.4%
27. Cheng4 0.38 x64
CATEGORIES MOVE_AVE GAMES TOTAL GAME_RATE
all wins 43 14 111 12.6%
28. Hannibal 1.4b x64
CATEGORIES MOVE_AVE GAMES TOTAL GAME_RATE
all wins 43 24 184 13.0%
29. Komodo 7a x64
CATEGORIES MOVE_AVE GAMES TOTAL GAME_RATE
all wins 43 32 68 47.1%
30. Stockfish 03.08.14 BMI2 x64
CATEGORIES MOVE_AVE GAMES TOTAL GAME_RATE
all wins 43 56 130 43.1%
31. Texel 1.05 x64
CATEGORIES MOVE_AVE GAMES TOTAL GAME_RATE
all wins 43 20 125 16.0%
32. Zappa Mexico II x64
CATEGORIES MOVE_AVE GAMES TOTAL GAME_RATE
all wins 43 10 101 9.9%
33. Komodo 8 x64
CATEGORIES MOVE_AVE GAMES TOTAL GAME_RATE
all wins 43 50 93 53.8%
34. Protector 1.6.0 x64
CATEGORIES MOVE_AVE GAMES TOTAL GAME_RATE
all wins 43 20 103 19.4%
35. Fire 4 x64
CATEGORIES MOVE_AVE GAMES TOTAL GAME_RATE
all wins 43 56 145 38.6%
36. Fizbo 1.2 x64
CATEGORIES MOVE_AVE GAMES TOTAL GAME_RATE
all wins 43 38 155 24.5%
37. EXchess 7.31b x64
CATEGORIES MOVE_AVE GAMES TOTAL GAME_RATE
all wins 43 17 68 25.0%
38. Arasan 17.5 POP x64
CATEGORIES MOVE_AVE GAMES TOTAL GAME_RATE
all wins 43 9 69 13.0%
39. Deuterium 14.2.33.276 x64
CATEGORIES MOVE_AVE GAMES TOTAL GAME_RATE
all wins 44 7 226 3.1%
40. iCE 2.0 v2240 POP x64
CATEGORIES MOVE_AVE GAMES TOTAL GAME_RATE
all wins 44 44 288 15.3%
41. Andscacs 0.64 POP x64
CATEGORIES MOVE_AVE GAMES TOTAL GAME_RATE
all wins 44 7 99 7.1%
42. Nirvanachess 1.7 x64
CATEGORIES MOVE_AVE GAMES TOTAL GAME_RATE
all wins 44 12 171 7.0%
43. Sting SF 4.8.4 x64
CATEGORIES MOVE_AVE GAMES TOTAL GAME_RATE
all wins 44 13 110 11.8%
44. Senpai 1.0 SSE42 x64
CATEGORIES MOVE_AVE GAMES TOTAL GAME_RATE
all wins 44 14 238 5.9%
45. Vajolet2 1.45 POP x64
CATEGORIES MOVE_AVE GAMES TOTAL GAME_RATE
all wins 44 6 253 2.4%
46. SmarThink 1.60 x64
CATEGORIES MOVE_AVE GAMES TOTAL GAME_RATE
all wins 44 8 66 12.1%
47. Junior 13.8.04 Yokohama x64
CATEGORIES MOVE_AVE GAMES TOTAL GAME_RATE
all wins 44 9 90 10.0%
48. Fire 3.0 AVX x64
CATEGORIES MOVE_AVE GAMES TOTAL GAME_RATE
all wins 44 21 109 19.3%
49. Critter 0.90 SSE4 x64
CATEGORIES MOVE_AVE GAMES TOTAL GAME_RATE
all wins 44 20 117 17.1%
50. Junior 13.3.00 x64
CATEGORIES MOVE_AVE GAMES TOTAL GAME_RATE
all wins 44 40 188 21.3%
51. Nirvanachess 1.6 x64
CATEGORIES MOVE_AVE GAMES TOTAL GAME_RATE
all wins 44 3 74 4.1%
52. Godel 3.4.9 x64
CATEGORIES MOVE_AVE GAMES TOTAL GAME_RATE
all wins 44 12 62 19.4%
53. Rodent 1.4 Build 2 POP x64
CATEGORIES MOVE_AVE GAMES TOTAL GAME_RATE
all wins 44 9 50 18.0%
54. GullChess 3.0 BMI2 x64
CATEGORIES MOVE_AVE GAMES TOTAL GAME_RATE
all wins 44 38 135 28.1%
55. Andscacs 0.72 POP x64
CATEGORIES MOVE_AVE GAMES TOTAL GAME_RATE
all wins 45 7 104 6.7%
56. Vajolet2 1.28 POP x64
CATEGORIES MOVE_AVE GAMES TOTAL GAME_RATE
all wins 45 1 77 1.3%
57. Stockfish 6 BMI2 x64
CATEGORIES MOVE_AVE GAMES TOTAL GAME_RATE
all wins 45 33 147 22.4%
58. Glaurung 2.2 JA x64
CATEGORIES MOVE_AVE GAMES TOTAL GAME_RATE
all wins 45 23 80 28.8%
59. Rhetoric 1.4.1 x64
CATEGORIES MOVE_AVE GAMES TOTAL GAME_RATE
all wins 45 11 127 8.7%
60. Djinn 1.021 POP x64
CATEGORIES MOVE_AVE GAMES TOTAL GAME_RATE
all wins 46 2 98 2.0%
61. Spike 1.4 Leiden w32
CATEGORIES MOVE_AVE GAMES TOTAL GAME_RATE
all wins 46 6 109 5.5%
62. DiscoCheck 5.2.1 x64
CATEGORIES MOVE_AVE GAMES TOTAL GAME_RATE
all wins 46 2 52 3.8%
63. Deuterium 14.3.34.130 POP x64
CATEGORIES MOVE_AVE GAMES TOTAL GAME_RATE
all wins 47 9 145 6.2%
64. Fizbo 1.3.1 x64
CATEGORIES MOVE_AVE GAMES TOTAL GAME_RATE
all wins 47 9 127 7.1%
65. DisasterArea 1.54 x64
CATEGORIES MOVE_AVE GAMES TOTAL GAME_RATE
all wins 48 2 73 2.7%-
Frank Quisinsky
- Posts: 7516
- Joined: Wed Nov 18, 2009 7:16 pm
- Location: Gutweiler, Germany
- Full name: Frank Quisinsky
Re: Small mistake and an other criteria for output file
Hi Ferdinand,
only that won / lost games sorted sorted with ...
I am thought about it today in the morning, yes!
But at the moment I don't have for your two new tools addiontal ideas.
How I added it in Excel ... means output in *.txt ... thought about it but I found very fast the solution with Notepad++ editor.
---
Maybe this one ...
But I can do it with your tool if I start it more times.
Interesting is to know for engine engine games ...
Example:
1. Stockfish 6 BMI2 x64 ...
Draw games ...
Move number 20-25
Move number 26-30
Move number 31-35
Move number 36-40
Move number 41-50
Move number 51-60
Move number 61-70
Move number 71-80
Move number 81-90
Move number 91-100
Move number 101-120
Move number 121-160
Move number 161-300
How many draws ... and after this on in %
1.000 games played ...
Move number 20-25 = 20 games = 2.0%
Move number 26-30 = 30 games = 3.0%
Move number 31-35 = 35 games = 3.5%
and so one ...
More easy to compare the complete results with others.
Also interesting to compare two versions from the same engine!
Contemp seems to be very important and I can't see it directly if programmers working with it (without contemp setting in UCI file or not).
Yesterday I made such stats with engines often or rarely play draw in different playing phases or comes with draws stats other don't have ... Quazar, SmarThink for examples. Very interesting why These programs have here others stats.
The one and only problem with all these stats is ...
late middlegame / transposition into endgame.
Means ...
Where started the late middlegame and where started the transposition into endgame. A combination with move length and pieces on board can give the results I like. You have programmed here a script too. I think I must work a bit with your tools and later in combination with all stats I can create we should try to solved this problem with eng-eng databases. Means I must produced more results with different engines to find out the optimal combination between move length and pieces on board.
Main problem, really!
In this playing phase the most games are 1-0 and 0-1 ...
And here we need clearly better ideas for stats to find out more. Very tricky.
Best
Frank
only that won / lost games sorted sorted with ...
Code: Select all
60. Spark 1.0 x64 (77+, 271=, 8-) 59.7%
CATEGORIES MOVE_AVE GAMES TOTAL GAME_RATE
all games 38 356
white won 42 42
black won 42 35
white draw 37 154
black draw 37 117
white loss 44 6
black loss 46 2
all wins 42 77 356 21.6% ... sorted with this one (21.6%) and ...
all draws 37 271 356 76.1%
all loses 45 8 356 2.2% ... sorted with this one (2.2%) ...
But at the moment I don't have for your two new tools addiontal ideas.
How I added it in Excel ... means output in *.txt ... thought about it but I found very fast the solution with Notepad++ editor.
---
Maybe this one ...
But I can do it with your tool if I start it more times.
Interesting is to know for engine engine games ...
Example:
1. Stockfish 6 BMI2 x64 ...
Draw games ...
Move number 20-25
Move number 26-30
Move number 31-35
Move number 36-40
Move number 41-50
Move number 51-60
Move number 61-70
Move number 71-80
Move number 81-90
Move number 91-100
Move number 101-120
Move number 121-160
Move number 161-300
How many draws ... and after this on in %
1.000 games played ...
Move number 20-25 = 20 games = 2.0%
Move number 26-30 = 30 games = 3.0%
Move number 31-35 = 35 games = 3.5%
and so one ...
More easy to compare the complete results with others.
Also interesting to compare two versions from the same engine!
Contemp seems to be very important and I can't see it directly if programmers working with it (without contemp setting in UCI file or not).
Yesterday I made such stats with engines often or rarely play draw in different playing phases or comes with draws stats other don't have ... Quazar, SmarThink for examples. Very interesting why These programs have here others stats.
The one and only problem with all these stats is ...
late middlegame / transposition into endgame.
Means ...
Where started the late middlegame and where started the transposition into endgame. A combination with move length and pieces on board can give the results I like. You have programmed here a script too. I think I must work a bit with your tools and later in combination with all stats I can create we should try to solved this problem with eng-eng databases. Means I must produced more results with different engines to find out the optimal combination between move length and pieces on board.
Main problem, really!
In this playing phase the most games are 1-0 and 0-1 ...
And here we need clearly better ideas for stats to find out more. Very tricky.
Best
Frank