MD v JL

Traditional chess games and chess topics in general

Moderators: hgm, chrisw, Rebel

Masterbaiter
Posts: 261
Joined: Tue May 05, 2015 12:34 am
Location: Ottawa Canada

Re: MD v JL: Gambit declined

Post by Masterbaiter »

Rc1
Looking for interesting people to chat with
Jack Lad
Posts: 8557
Joined: Wed Mar 08, 2006 10:01 pm
Location: UK

Re: MD v JL: Gambit declined

Post by Jack Lad »

Masterbaiter wrote:Rc1
[d] 1r6/3b1r2/1p1k1p2/p2Pp3/N3P1p1/1P2P1Pp/1P1K1R1P/2R5 w - - 30 46
[pgn]1. e4 c5 2. Nf3 g5 3. Nc3 g4 4. Ne5 h5 5. Bc4 e6 6. d4 a6 7. dxc5 Bxc5 8. Nd3 Bd4 9. Bb3 Nc6 10. O-O d6 11. Be3 Bxe3 12. fxe3 Nf6 13. Qd2 Qe7 14. Rad1 Nd7 15. Nf4 Nce5 16. Qxd6 Qxd6 17. Rxd6 Ke7 18. Rfd1 Nc5 19. R6d2 Nxb3 20. axb3 Bd7 21. Nd3 Nxd3 22. cxd3 f6 23. Rf1 Raf8 24. d4 h4 25. Rdf2 Bc6 26. Rf4 Rhg8 27. g3 h3 28. R1f2 a5 29. Rf1 b6 30. d5 e5 31. R4f2 Bd7 32. Rd1 Rg7 33. Kf1 Rgf7 34. Ke1 Kd6 35. Ke2 Rc8 36. Ra1 Rcf8 37. Rc1 Rc8 38. Kd2 Rcf8 39. Ke2 Rc8 40. Kd2 Rcf8 41. Rcf1 Ke7 42. Nb1 Rc8 43. Nc3 Rcf8 44. Na4 Rb8 45. Rc1 Kd6[/pgn]
Masterbaiter
Posts: 261
Joined: Tue May 05, 2015 12:34 am
Location: Ottawa Canada

Re: MD v JL: Gambit declined

Post by Masterbaiter »

Rc3
Looking for interesting people to chat with
Jack Lad
Posts: 8557
Joined: Wed Mar 08, 2006 10:01 pm
Location: UK

Re: MD v JL: Gambit declined

Post by Jack Lad »

Masterbaiter wrote:Rc3
[d] 1r3r2/3b4/1p1k1p2/p2Pp3/N3P1p1/1PR1P1Pp/1P1K1R1P/8 w - - 32 47
[pgn]1. e4 c5 2. Nf3 g5 3. Nc3 g4 4. Ne5 h5 5. Bc4 e6 6. d4 a6 7. dxc5 Bxc5 8. Nd3 Bd4 9. Bb3 Nc6 10. O-O d6 11. Be3 Bxe3 12. fxe3 Nf6 13. Qd2 Qe7 14. Rad1 Nd7 15. Nf4 Nce5 16. Qxd6 Qxd6 17. Rxd6 Ke7 18. Rfd1 Nc5 19. R6d2 Nxb3 20. axb3 Bd7 21. Nd3 Nxd3 22. cxd3 f6 23. Rf1 Raf8 24. d4 h4 25. Rdf2 Bc6 26. Rf4 Rhg8 27. g3 h3 28. R1f2 a5 29. Rf1 b6 30. d5 e5 31. R4f2 Bd7 32. Rd1 Rg7 33. Kf1 Rgf7 34. Ke1 Kd6 35. Ke2 Rc8 36. Ra1 Rcf8 37. Rc1 Rc8 38. Kd2 Rcf8 39. Ke2 Rc8 40. Kd2 Rcf8 41. Rcf1 Ke7 42. Nb1 Rc8 43. Nc3 Rcf8 44. Na4 Rb8 45. Rc1 Kd6 46. Rc3 Rff8[/pgn]
Masterbaiter
Posts: 261
Joined: Tue May 05, 2015 12:34 am
Location: Ottawa Canada

Re: MD v JL: Gambit declined

Post by Masterbaiter »

I play Rc2. I see no way to make headway so would you like to agree to a draw?
Looking for interesting people to chat with
Jack Lad
Posts: 8557
Joined: Wed Mar 08, 2006 10:01 pm
Location: UK

Re: MD v JL: Gambit declined

Post by Jack Lad »

Masterbaiter wrote:I play Rc2. I see no way to make headway so would you like to agree to a draw?
[d] 1r3r2/3b4/1p1k1p2/p2Pp3/N3P1p1/1P2P1Pp/1PRK1R1P/8 b - - 33 47
[pgn]1. e4 c5 2. Nf3 g5 3. Nc3 g4 4. Ne5 h5 5. Bc4 e6 6. d4 a6 7. dxc5 Bxc5 8. Nd3 Bd4 9. Bb3 Nc6 10. O-O d6 11. Be3 Bxe3 12. fxe3 Nf6 13. Qd2 Qe7 14. Rad1 Nd7 15. Nf4 Nce5 16. Qxd6 Qxd6 17. Rxd6 Ke7 18. Rfd1 Nc5 19. R6d2 Nxb3 20. axb3 Bd7 21. Nd3 Nxd3 22. cxd3 f6 23. Rf1 Raf8 24. d4 h4 25. Rdf2 Bc6 26. Rf4 Rhg8 27. g3 h3 28. R1f2 a5 29. Rf1 b6 30. d5 e5 31. R4f2 Bd7 32. Rd1 Rg7 33. Kf1 Rgf7 34. Ke1 Kd6 35. Ke2 Rc8 36. Ra1 Rcf8 37. Rc1 Rc8 38. Kd2 Rcf8 39. Ke2 Rc8 40. Kd2 Rcf8 41. Rcf1 Ke7 42. Nb1 Rc8 43. Nc3 Rcf8 44. Na4 Rb8 45. Rc1 Kd6 46. Rc3 Rff8 47. Rc2[/pgn]
Draw agreed - thanks for the game Martin. 8-)
gerold
Posts: 10121
Joined: Thu Mar 09, 2006 12:57 am
Location: van buren,missouri

Re: MD v JL: Gambit declined

Post by gerold »

Very good game. Jack did good job of not taking the white knight on the Q side making it a draw.
Terry McCracken
Posts: 16465
Joined: Wed Aug 01, 2007 4:16 am
Location: Canada

Re: MD v JL: Gambit declined

Post by Terry McCracken »

gerold wrote:Very good game. Jack did good job of not taking the white knight on the Q side making it a draw.
No, it was Houdini, not Mr. Anonymous. Giving credit to a cheat is depraved.
Terry McCracken
User avatar
mhull
Posts: 13447
Joined: Wed Mar 08, 2006 9:02 pm
Location: Dallas, Texas
Full name: Matthew Hull

Re: MD v JL: Gambit declined

Post by mhull »

Terry McCracken wrote:
gerold wrote:Very good game. Jack did good job of not taking the white knight on the Q side making it a draw.
No, it was Houdini, not Mr. Anonymous. Giving credit to a cheat is depraved.
I thought both sides were using computers by agreement. If that's the case no cheating happened.
Matthew Hull
Terry McCracken
Posts: 16465
Joined: Wed Aug 01, 2007 4:16 am
Location: Canada

Re: MD v JL: Gambit declined

Post by Terry McCracken »

mhull wrote:
Terry McCracken wrote:
gerold wrote:Very good game. Jack did good job of not taking the white knight on the Q side making it a draw.
No, it was Houdini, not Mr. Anonymous. Giving credit to a cheat is depraved.
I thought both sides were using computers by agreement. If that's the case no cheating happened.
As I said, Martin isn't use to playing computer corr. chess. Martin accepted his conditions but really shouldn't have. I didn't want him to. Martin made mostly human moves, not so for Mc Cheat. All his moves were computer.

I know as I checked. It is depraved to promote this form of chess.
Terry McCracken