MD v JL
Moderators: hgm, chrisw, Rebel
-
- Posts: 261
- Joined: Tue May 05, 2015 12:34 am
- Location: Ottawa Canada
-
- Posts: 8557
- Joined: Wed Mar 08, 2006 10:01 pm
- Location: UK
Re: MD v JL: Gambit declined
[d] 1r6/3b1r2/1p1k1p2/p2Pp3/N3P1p1/1P2P1Pp/1P1K1R1P/2R5 w - - 30 46Masterbaiter wrote:Rc1
[pgn]1. e4 c5 2. Nf3 g5 3. Nc3 g4 4. Ne5 h5 5. Bc4 e6 6. d4 a6 7. dxc5 Bxc5 8. Nd3 Bd4 9. Bb3 Nc6 10. O-O d6 11. Be3 Bxe3 12. fxe3 Nf6 13. Qd2 Qe7 14. Rad1 Nd7 15. Nf4 Nce5 16. Qxd6 Qxd6 17. Rxd6 Ke7 18. Rfd1 Nc5 19. R6d2 Nxb3 20. axb3 Bd7 21. Nd3 Nxd3 22. cxd3 f6 23. Rf1 Raf8 24. d4 h4 25. Rdf2 Bc6 26. Rf4 Rhg8 27. g3 h3 28. R1f2 a5 29. Rf1 b6 30. d5 e5 31. R4f2 Bd7 32. Rd1 Rg7 33. Kf1 Rgf7 34. Ke1 Kd6 35. Ke2 Rc8 36. Ra1 Rcf8 37. Rc1 Rc8 38. Kd2 Rcf8 39. Ke2 Rc8 40. Kd2 Rcf8 41. Rcf1 Ke7 42. Nb1 Rc8 43. Nc3 Rcf8 44. Na4 Rb8 45. Rc1 Kd6[/pgn]
-
- Posts: 261
- Joined: Tue May 05, 2015 12:34 am
- Location: Ottawa Canada
-
- Posts: 8557
- Joined: Wed Mar 08, 2006 10:01 pm
- Location: UK
Re: MD v JL: Gambit declined
[d] 1r3r2/3b4/1p1k1p2/p2Pp3/N3P1p1/1PR1P1Pp/1P1K1R1P/8 w - - 32 47Masterbaiter wrote:Rc3
[pgn]1. e4 c5 2. Nf3 g5 3. Nc3 g4 4. Ne5 h5 5. Bc4 e6 6. d4 a6 7. dxc5 Bxc5 8. Nd3 Bd4 9. Bb3 Nc6 10. O-O d6 11. Be3 Bxe3 12. fxe3 Nf6 13. Qd2 Qe7 14. Rad1 Nd7 15. Nf4 Nce5 16. Qxd6 Qxd6 17. Rxd6 Ke7 18. Rfd1 Nc5 19. R6d2 Nxb3 20. axb3 Bd7 21. Nd3 Nxd3 22. cxd3 f6 23. Rf1 Raf8 24. d4 h4 25. Rdf2 Bc6 26. Rf4 Rhg8 27. g3 h3 28. R1f2 a5 29. Rf1 b6 30. d5 e5 31. R4f2 Bd7 32. Rd1 Rg7 33. Kf1 Rgf7 34. Ke1 Kd6 35. Ke2 Rc8 36. Ra1 Rcf8 37. Rc1 Rc8 38. Kd2 Rcf8 39. Ke2 Rc8 40. Kd2 Rcf8 41. Rcf1 Ke7 42. Nb1 Rc8 43. Nc3 Rcf8 44. Na4 Rb8 45. Rc1 Kd6 46. Rc3 Rff8[/pgn]
-
- Posts: 261
- Joined: Tue May 05, 2015 12:34 am
- Location: Ottawa Canada
Re: MD v JL: Gambit declined
I play Rc2. I see no way to make headway so would you like to agree to a draw?
Looking for interesting people to chat with
-
- Posts: 8557
- Joined: Wed Mar 08, 2006 10:01 pm
- Location: UK
Re: MD v JL: Gambit declined
[d] 1r3r2/3b4/1p1k1p2/p2Pp3/N3P1p1/1P2P1Pp/1PRK1R1P/8 b - - 33 47Masterbaiter wrote:I play Rc2. I see no way to make headway so would you like to agree to a draw?
[pgn]1. e4 c5 2. Nf3 g5 3. Nc3 g4 4. Ne5 h5 5. Bc4 e6 6. d4 a6 7. dxc5 Bxc5 8. Nd3 Bd4 9. Bb3 Nc6 10. O-O d6 11. Be3 Bxe3 12. fxe3 Nf6 13. Qd2 Qe7 14. Rad1 Nd7 15. Nf4 Nce5 16. Qxd6 Qxd6 17. Rxd6 Ke7 18. Rfd1 Nc5 19. R6d2 Nxb3 20. axb3 Bd7 21. Nd3 Nxd3 22. cxd3 f6 23. Rf1 Raf8 24. d4 h4 25. Rdf2 Bc6 26. Rf4 Rhg8 27. g3 h3 28. R1f2 a5 29. Rf1 b6 30. d5 e5 31. R4f2 Bd7 32. Rd1 Rg7 33. Kf1 Rgf7 34. Ke1 Kd6 35. Ke2 Rc8 36. Ra1 Rcf8 37. Rc1 Rc8 38. Kd2 Rcf8 39. Ke2 Rc8 40. Kd2 Rcf8 41. Rcf1 Ke7 42. Nb1 Rc8 43. Nc3 Rcf8 44. Na4 Rb8 45. Rc1 Kd6 46. Rc3 Rff8 47. Rc2[/pgn]
Draw agreed - thanks for the game Martin.
-
- Posts: 10121
- Joined: Thu Mar 09, 2006 12:57 am
- Location: van buren,missouri
Re: MD v JL: Gambit declined
Very good game. Jack did good job of not taking the white knight on the Q side making it a draw.
-
- Posts: 16465
- Joined: Wed Aug 01, 2007 4:16 am
- Location: Canada
Re: MD v JL: Gambit declined
No, it was Houdini, not Mr. Anonymous. Giving credit to a cheat is depraved.gerold wrote:Very good game. Jack did good job of not taking the white knight on the Q side making it a draw.
Terry McCracken
-
- Posts: 13447
- Joined: Wed Mar 08, 2006 9:02 pm
- Location: Dallas, Texas
- Full name: Matthew Hull
Re: MD v JL: Gambit declined
I thought both sides were using computers by agreement. If that's the case no cheating happened.Terry McCracken wrote:No, it was Houdini, not Mr. Anonymous. Giving credit to a cheat is depraved.gerold wrote:Very good game. Jack did good job of not taking the white knight on the Q side making it a draw.
Matthew Hull
-
- Posts: 16465
- Joined: Wed Aug 01, 2007 4:16 am
- Location: Canada
Re: MD v JL: Gambit declined
As I said, Martin isn't use to playing computer corr. chess. Martin accepted his conditions but really shouldn't have. I didn't want him to. Martin made mostly human moves, not so for Mc Cheat. All his moves were computer.mhull wrote:I thought both sides were using computers by agreement. If that's the case no cheating happened.Terry McCracken wrote:No, it was Houdini, not Mr. Anonymous. Giving credit to a cheat is depraved.gerold wrote:Very good game. Jack did good job of not taking the white knight on the Q side making it a draw.
I know as I checked. It is depraved to promote this form of chess.
Terry McCracken