My test for SlowChess Blitz Classic 2.4 x64

Discussion of computer chess matches and engine tournaments.

Moderators: hgm, Dann Corbit, Harvey Williamson

User avatar
Sylwy
Posts: 4437
Joined: Fri Apr 21, 2006 4:19 pm
Location: IASI - the historical capital of MOLDOVA
Full name: SilvianR

My test for SlowChess Blitz Classic 2.4 x64

Post by Sylwy »

Test conditions:
-TC=4'+2"
-Hash=256 MB
-GUI: Arena 3.5.1
-Books: Perfect_2010.abk (Ethereal 12.50-x64-pext) & TestBook.scb (SlowChess Blitz Classic 2.4 x64)
-default settings for both engines
-1 thread-CPU=Intel i5-7400-3GHz (Kaby Lake)
-6-men Syzygy bases for both engines
-OS: Windows 10 Home

Image

Image

Ethereal 12.50 x64 has 3377 Elo points (CCRL Blitz).
SlowChess Blitz 2.3 x64 has 3362 Elo points (CCRL Blitz).
No gain in Elo points over version 2.3 (in my test).
AndrewGrant
Posts: 1660
Joined: Tue Apr 19, 2016 6:08 am
Location: U.S.A
Full name: Andrew Grant

Re: My test for SlowChess Blitz Classic 2.4 x64

Post by AndrewGrant »

Good thing I dropped 12.75 with big elo gains.
Don't want Slowchess catching up to Ethereal so quickly, where would the fun be for Jonathan? :)
Talkchess is dead without moderation. If you want my attention, contact me via andrew@grantnet.us
jonkr
Posts: 178
Joined: Wed Nov 13, 2019 1:36 am
Full name: Jonathan Kreuzer

Re: My test for SlowChess Blitz Classic 2.4 x64

Post by jonkr »

Thanks for testing, tough second half for SlowChess. This is the first time I've seen someone use the own book in a match. I should start updating it again, I stopped around 1.8. I used to run 2min+1s matches with release candidates, and have it learn the first 13 moves of winning/drawing side(s).

Right now still planning on starting on v2.5 next year, so I might eventually catch up :) (if Andrew is really done with Ethereal)
Madeleine Birchfield
Posts: 512
Joined: Tue Sep 29, 2020 4:29 pm
Location: Dublin, Ireland
Full name: Madeleine Birchfield

Re: My test for SlowChess Blitz Classic 2.4 x64

Post by Madeleine Birchfield »

jonkr wrote: Thu Nov 12, 2020 1:13 am Thanks for testing, tough second half for SlowChess. This is the first time I've seen someone use the own book in a match. I should start updating it again, I stopped around 1.8. I used to run 2min+1s matches with release candidates, and have it learn the first 13 moves of winning/drawing side(s).

Right now still planning on starting on v2.5 next year, so I might eventually catch up :) (if Andrew is really done with Ethereal)
I think Andrew Grant has moved on to working on Halogen with Kieren Pearson.
AndrewGrant
Posts: 1660
Joined: Tue Apr 19, 2016 6:08 am
Location: U.S.A
Full name: Andrew Grant

Re: My test for SlowChess Blitz Classic 2.4 x64

Post by AndrewGrant »

Madeleine Birchfield wrote: Thu Nov 12, 2020 6:37 am
jonkr wrote: Thu Nov 12, 2020 1:13 am Thanks for testing, tough second half for SlowChess. This is the first time I've seen someone use the own book in a match. I should start updating it again, I stopped around 1.8. I used to run 2min+1s matches with release candidates, and have it learn the first 13 moves of winning/drawing side(s).

Right now still planning on starting on v2.5 next year, so I might eventually catch up :) (if Andrew is really done with Ethereal)
I think Andrew Grant has moved on to working on Halogen with Kieren Pearson.
Uh, not really. I just happened to write a tool which I wanted tested with Halogen. I'm not working on Halogen.
Talkchess is dead without moderation. If you want my attention, contact me via andrew@grantnet.us