Rybka vs Fat Fritz controversies

Discussion of anything and everything relating to chess playing software and machines.

Moderators: hgm, Dann Corbit, Harvey Williamson

Frank Quisinsky
Posts: 6808
Joined: Wed Nov 18, 2009 7:16 pm
Location: Gutweiler, Germany
Full name: Frank Quisinsky

Re: Rybka vs Fat Fritz controversies

Post by Frank Quisinsky »

Hello Krzysztof,

speaking from Shredder versions in times before Rybka is on position 1.
Indeed the current version is very old and around place 15-18 in the World today.
But 30-40 Elo stronger as Wasp.

:-)

Maybe with NNUE and more modern processor improvements Shredder can be on place 3-6 today?!

For 2-3 months I contact Stefan Meyer-Kahlen.
I sent him some bugs / a list of bugs Shredder GUI produced.

For around three weeks Stefan sent me different questions to my list.
Possible (I am not sure, not asked him) that a new Shredder version is on the way.

Speaking for myself: I hope of a newer version!

Best
Frank
Frank Quisinsky
Posts: 6808
Joined: Wed Nov 18, 2009 7:16 pm
Location: Gutweiler, Germany
Full name: Frank Quisinsky

Re: Rybka vs Fat Fritz controversies

Post by Frank Quisinsky »

Normally I should nothing say about Chessbase and Rybka.

In times Rybka 1 is available I made an interview with Vas.
Before the interview I had a long discussion with him per eMail.
Vas asked for my opinion to a commercial project.

I told him, the best way is to go to Chessbase or Convekta and Vas do that.

But to this time I had no information about the Fruit problematic around it.
Forgot to write that!
carldaman
Posts: 2277
Joined: Sat Jun 02, 2012 2:13 am

Re: Rybka vs Fat Fritz controversies

Post by carldaman »

Dann Corbit wrote: Tue Mar 02, 2021 9:24 am Because of the exponential advance of chess software, in five years the stockfish of today will look weak compared to whatever is best in 2026.
I don't think we need to be critical of existing software. The ancient Rybka will still clean the clock of 99.99999% of the {unassisted} humans on earth at any time control, so it was pretty good when it was best (like Shredder, Junior, etc.).
For instance, from Pohl's site, SF has risen 418 Elo in 5 years.

I expect the new AMD GPU architecture to be a jaw-dropper.
Coordinated access to video RAM by both the CPU and GPU. Think of it.

Right, there are two common extremes that we all can do well to avoid -

1) worshipping at the 'feet' of the current #1 as if it were an infallible god
2) totally dismissing any former #1 of the past few years as weak and worthless

:)
Dann Corbit
Posts: 12482
Joined: Wed Mar 08, 2006 8:57 pm
Location: Redmond, WA USA

Re: Rybka vs Fat Fritz controversies

Post by Dann Corbit »

carldaman wrote: Wed Mar 03, 2021 3:41 am
Dann Corbit wrote: Tue Mar 02, 2021 9:24 am Because of the exponential advance of chess software, in five years the stockfish of today will look weak compared to whatever is best in 2026.
I don't think we need to be critical of existing software. The ancient Rybka will still clean the clock of 99.99999% of the {unassisted} humans on earth at any time control, so it was pretty good when it was best (like Shredder, Junior, etc.).
For instance, from Pohl's site, SF has risen 418 Elo in 5 years.

I expect the new AMD GPU architecture to be a jaw-dropper.
Coordinated access to video RAM by both the CPU and GPU. Think of it.

Right, there are two common extremes that we all can do well to avoid -

1) worshipping at the 'feet' of the current #1 as if it were an infallible god
2) totally dismissing any former #1 of the past few years as weak and worthless

:)
I agree completely. And yet I suspect that everyone (me included) is guilty of one or both of these sins from time to time.
Taking ideas is not a vice, it is a virtue. We have another word for this. It is called learning.
But sharing ideas is an even greater virtue. We have another word for this. It is called teaching.