without Tbases (5 men), the engine plays well. But just engine starts to using them I get this error message ...
Firma problema:
Nome evento problema: APPCRASH
Nome applicazione: Roc_0_3_x64.exe
Versione applicazione: 0.0.0.0
Timestamp applicazione: 589f7198
Nome modulo con errori: Roc_0_3_x64.exe
Versione modulo con errori: 0.0.0.0
Timestamp modulo con errori: 589f7198
Codice eccezione: c000001d
Offset eccezione: 0000000000033d60
Versione SO: 6.1.7601.2.1.0.256.48
ID impostazioni locali: 1040
Informazioni aggiuntive 1: 8e8a
Ulteriori informazioni 2: 8e8a93ae2c19195040bc017dbff31bd4
Ulteriori informazioni 3: 5c30
Ulteriori informazioni 4: 5c300b304fa8bb0553ae11e1ec5cd9ad
solution?
New engine "Roc"
Moderators: hgm, Rebel, chrisw
-
- Posts: 49
- Joined: Thu Nov 10, 2016 11:40 am
- Location: Italy
- Full name: Aleandro Rossi
-
- Posts: 1777
- Joined: Thu Jun 05, 2008 10:58 pm
- Location: Canada
Re: New engine "Roc"
Why do you consider a copy and paste of another engine a "new" engine?THyer wrote:Roc is a new chess engine, derived from Gull 3.
-
- Posts: 2801
- Joined: Mon Feb 11, 2008 3:53 pm
- Location: Denmark
- Full name: Damir Desevac
Re: New engine "Roc"
Improvement of 40-50 elo over the original is considered copy&paste. Also Roc, just like Gull is open source, so no harm is done.
-
- Posts: 40
- Joined: Fri Jul 22, 2016 7:51 pm
Re: New engine "Roc"
Can't you switch off TBs simply by not providing the Syzygy path?
"Wise and cruel was the Bird, and wise and cruel were the Sons of the Bird."
-
- Posts: 3186
- Joined: Sat Feb 16, 2008 7:38 am
- Full name: Peter Martan
Re: New engine "Roc"
Of course I can, Tom, that's why I called it immodest by myself. Just as for Fritz- GUI it's a matter of deleting the pathes in GUI- parameters having to give them in again later on, and it's 3 of them for Syzygys together with dtz and wdl,
Peter.
-
- Posts: 1476
- Joined: Mon Jan 28, 2013 2:51 pm
Re: New engine "Roc"
I have started a 2046-game match between Roc 0.3 HNI and JV's Gull 3.1, TC 20"+1", Threads = 16 (8 cores w/ HT), Hash = 4096M, Ponder = ON, Syzygy. After 110 games, Gull 3.1 has a slim lead over Roc 0.3, +23-19=68.
THyer wrote:Thanks, Michael.
-
- Posts: 4367
- Joined: Fri Mar 10, 2006 5:23 am
- Location: http://www.arasanchess.org
Re: New engine "Roc"
Would be nice if it ran on non-Windows (POSIX) platforms. Or used multithreading. Those are two of the main limitations of Gull, IMO.
--Jon
--Jon
-
- Posts: 40
- Joined: Fri Jul 22, 2016 7:51 pm
Re: New engine "Roc"
2046 games? Is this some Cryptonomicon-like meaningful number?
Looking forward to the result, anyway.
Looking forward to the result, anyway.
"Wise and cruel was the Bird, and wise and cruel were the Sons of the Bird."
-
- Posts: 1476
- Joined: Mon Jan 28, 2013 2:51 pm
Re: New engine "Roc"
In Arena, it is!
THyer wrote:2046 games? Is this some Cryptonomicon-like meaningful number?
Looking forward to the result, anyway.
-
- Posts: 1476
- Joined: Mon Jan 28, 2013 2:51 pm
Re: "Roc" - it is an improvement !!
Overnight, Roc 0.3 crashed 3 times under Arena, while Gull 3.1 ran stable, so after 543 games I see Gull 3.1 ahead, +149-96=298.
velmarin wrote:Guenther wrote:Just for the record, Gull 3.1 is not a basil forked.pohl4711 wrote:I started a testrun of Roc 0.2 for my Stockfish-gamebase
I think it should also be compared to LazyGull and Gull 3.1 forked by Basil Falcinelli.
https://github.com/basil00/Gull
It is all possible equal to the project of ThinkingALot,
Nor do I think there are differences of game between the twos versions.
https://github.com/Velmarin/Chess-Gull-Syzygy/releases