Thanks...and thanks for the (easy) button! When I get back in today I would hope to look at the 170 lost by SF 14 and see what percentage of those were also lost by SF 13 and what may have been related to the opening itself vs SF 13 outplaying SF 14. Overall #'s are great to go by... specific subsets can be just as telling.
If there is a relatively easy way to do so.
There is more to tell, I am currently playing SF14 in order that it faces the same opponents and openings as SF13, see: http://rebel13.nl/a/grl.htm and notice how high rated engines like SF10 and SF11 are demolished, this gives much elo.
Hmmm...only one game played with C05, that may make any real straight up comparison problematic.
Perhaps the book lines are just too short at time and non-guided play resulted in a transposition (?). Either way, doesn't look like this will be as easy as I had hoped....
I'll bet 'short lines' favor CF 14...just a hunch.
JohnW wrote: ↑Mon Jul 05, 2021 10:21 pm
So where am I supposed to get the eval file that is referenced when I register the engine?
nn-3475407dc199.nnue
It's not included in the zip file..
Built in
"Good decisions come from experience, and experience comes from bad decisions."
__________________________________________________________________
Ted Summers
daniel71 wrote: ↑Tue Jul 06, 2021 4:47 am
What is the verdict for SF14? Better or worse than SF 13 or was the lower rating because it doesn't handle gambits as well as SF13.
It plays a minor role IMO. I played 1100 new games in order that SF13 and SF14 more or less now played the same opponents, which gave SF14 an 8 elo increase.
