Should Vas be in the chess programmers hall of fame?

Discussion of anything and everything relating to chess playing software and machines.

Moderators: hgm, Rebel, chrisw

jmartus
Posts: 256
Joined: Sun May 16, 2010 2:50 am

Should Vas be in the chess programmers hall of fame?

Post by jmartus »

I feel rybka start a new era in computer chess If there was a hall of fame he should be in it
User avatar
towforce
Posts: 11572
Joined: Thu Mar 09, 2006 12:57 am
Location: Birmingham UK

Re: Should Vas be in the chess programmers hall of fame?

Post by towforce »

The evidence suggests that the innovation that strongly boosted Rybka's elo was tuning of engine parameters. If this is correct, then he should certainly get credit for being the first to do that.
Writing is the antidote to confusion.
It's not "how smart you are", it's "how are you smart".
Your brain doesn't work the way you want, so train it!
jmartus
Posts: 256
Joined: Sun May 16, 2010 2:50 am

Re: Should Vas be in the chess programmers hall of fame?

Post by jmartus »

I thought it was a material imbalance table too he was the 1st to do that as well
Michel
Posts: 2272
Joined: Mon Sep 29, 2008 1:50 am

Re: Should Vas be in the chess programmers hall of fame?

Post by Michel »

He also invented very aggressive LMR (far beyond the 1 or 2 plies that were the norm before).

When this became public knowledge through Ippolit, other engines (including SF) became hundreds of Elo stronger.
Ideas=science. Simplification=engineering.
Without ideas there is nothing to simplify.
Milos
Posts: 4190
Joined: Wed Nov 25, 2009 1:47 am

Re: Should Vas be in the chess programmers hall of fame?

Post by Milos »

Michel wrote: Tue Jul 06, 2021 7:12 am He also invented very aggressive LMR (far beyond the 1 or 2 plies that were the norm before).

When this became public knowledge through Ippolit, other engines (including SF) became hundreds of Elo stronger.
Aggressive pruning overall (also null-move reductions), higher extensions, quite a lot of things that impact strong tree shaping. Ofc one needed very well tuned eval for this, otherwise it wouldn't work.
Glaurung had EBF of 5+ and very light pruning. And then after Ippolit SF became the most aggressively pruning engine.
Basically in terms of impact on search development in various engines by far the biggest one came from Ippolit (much more than Fruit or Crafty or any other open source for the matter).
User avatar
Thomas Lagershausen
Posts: 328
Joined: Mon Jun 11, 2007 6:59 pm

Re: Should Vas be in the chess programmers hall of fame?

Post by Thomas Lagershausen »

Rybka 1.0 and Rybka 2.32 64bit were milestones in computerchess.

In this time there were no alternatives to Rybka.

I know what i say because i am a tournamentplayer.

So my vote for the place in the hall of fame goes to Vas. :!:
TL