A performance rating so close to the existing Komodo CCT made me very suspicious, tooModern Times wrote:Oh that is a bit boring Ingo, no new engine at all !! Just an existing one with a different setting
Aser Huerga wrote:I have been dreaming with a new and super strong Shredder ...
Don wrote:But I know what's going on and this is just another clone. A program this strong just doesn't appear out of nowhere.tomgdrums wrote:Don wrote:Oh great, all we need is yet another clone.
Don
IWB wrote:I havent tested it (I only have a little insight) but this is for your consideration:
http://www.inwoba.de
Make your guess ...
Have fun
Ingo
PS: It is not one of the known recompiles with a different name!
PPS: New full IPON list later this weekend
Easy Don!
Don't start casting stones before you know what is going on....
Ok, I'll fess up. Ingo will explain, but someone already correctly guessed what this is. It's Komodo CCT with time usage aggressiveness set to 3!
Code: Select all
2 Guess (K-CCT-TA3) : 2700 (+1583,=899,-218), 75.3%
Chiron 1.5 : 150 (+ 79,= 62,- 9), 73.3 %
Deep Shredder 12 : 150 (+ 92,= 49,- 9), 77.7 %
Critter 1.4a : 150 (+ 47,= 85,- 18), 59.7 %
Booot 5.2.0 : 150 (+121,= 23,- 6), 88.3 %
Protector 1.5.0 : 150 (+ 83,= 58,- 9), 74.7 %
Gull II : 150 (+ 62,= 75,- 13), 66.3 %
Quazar 0.4 : 150 (+118,= 29,- 3), 88.3 %
Deep Junior 13.3 : 150 (+110,= 33,- 7), 84.3 %
Deep Rybka 4.1 : 150 (+ 55,= 73,- 22), 61.0 %
Stockfish 3 : 150 (+ 46,= 82,- 22), 58.0 %
Deep Sjeng c't 2010 32b : 150 (+111,= 29,- 10), 83.7 %
spark-1.0 : 150 (+106,= 41,- 3), 84.3 %
Hannibal 1.3 : 150 (+103,= 36,- 11), 80.7 %
Naum 4.2 : 150 (+ 93,= 42,- 15), 76.0 %
Toga II 3.0 32b : 150 (+117,= 27,- 6), 87.0 %
HIARCS 14 WCSC 32b : 150 (+102,= 39,- 9), 81.0 %
Houdini 3 STD : 150 (+ 39,= 68,- 43), 48.7 %
Spike 1.4 32b : 150 (+ 99,= 48,- 3), 82.0 %
2 Komodo CCT : 2700 (+1590,=893,-217), 75.4 %
Chiron 1.5 : 150 (+ 75,= 68,- 7), 72.7 %
Deep Shredder 12 : 150 (+ 97,= 47,- 6), 80.3 %
Critter 1.4a : 150 (+ 45,= 76,- 29), 55.3 %
Booot 5.2.0 : 150 (+128,= 20,- 2), 92.0 %
Protector 1.5.0 : 150 (+ 90,= 48,- 12), 76.0 %
Gull II : 150 (+ 55,= 82,- 13), 64.0 %
Quazar 0.4 : 150 (+116,= 28,- 6), 86.7 %
Deep Junior 13.3 : 150 (+114,= 31,- 5), 86.3 %
Deep Rybka 4.1 : 150 (+ 52,= 78,- 20), 60.7 %
Stockfish 3 : 150 (+ 49,= 78,- 23), 58.7 %
Deep Sjeng c't 2010 32b : 150 (+107,= 38,- 5), 84.0 %
spark-1.0 : 150 (+112,= 34,- 4), 86.0 %
Hannibal 1.3 : 150 (+ 95,= 48,- 7), 79.3 %
Naum 4.2 : 150 (+ 99,= 39,- 12), 79.0 %
Toga II 3.0 32b : 150 (+123,= 24,- 3), 90.0 %
HIARCS 14 WCSC 32b : 150 (+ 95,= 46,- 9), 78.7 %
Houdini 3 STD : 150 (+ 33,= 71,- 46), 45.7 %
Spike 1.4 32b : 150 (+105,= 37,- 8), 82.3 %
Guess (K-CCT-TA3) - Komodo CCT : 150 (+ 26,=107,- 17), 53.0 %
But then, why particularly test "time usage aggressivness", and why 3?IWB wrote:It is a CCT setting with 'time usage aggressivness = 3'.
I was told that this might be particular successfull ... and as I wasnt at home and had some free comps I gave it a shoot. Nothing else.ernest wrote:But then, why particularly test "time usage aggressivness", and why 3?IWB wrote:It is a CCT setting with 'time usage aggressivness = 3'.
There are quite a few other parameters that could have been tested...
Or was it a special demand by the Komodo team?
If you have some free computing time, we want you to join to:IWB wrote:I was told that this might be particular successfull ... and as I wasnt at home and had some free comps I gave it a shoot. Nothing else.ernest wrote:But then, why particularly test "time usage aggressivness", and why 3?IWB wrote:It is a CCT setting with 'time usage aggressivness = 3'.
There are quite a few other parameters that could have been tested...
Or was it a special demand by the Komodo team?
Bye
Ingo