
mmt Vs. Ovyron (G4 D5 BG2)
Moderator: Ras
-
- Posts: 4558
- Joined: Tue Jul 03, 2007 4:30 am
Re: mmt Vs. Ovyron (G4 D5 BG2)
Bring in the best you can Jim! 

-
- Posts: 919
- Joined: Sat May 31, 2014 8:28 am
Re: mmt Vs. Ovyron (G4 D5 BG2)
I'm curious how deep your SF searches are vice your Lco searches.mmt wrote: ↑Thu Jan 30, 2020 1:08 am A little update: I'm changing LC0's weights to net 59866. I haven't seen or done enough testing to know that my previous bigger Sergio's net is better. I'm also updating the parameters for wider search because I'm doing very long calculations and I'm using SF to guide LC0 if there are tactical problems. I will be recompiling LC0 to use doubles instead of floats like koedem has suggested - this seems more important in long searches.
h4 is likely next.
Regards,
Zenmastur
Only 2 defining forces have ever offered to die for you.....Jesus Christ and the American Soldier. One died for your soul, the other for your freedom.
-
- Posts: 343
- Joined: Sun Aug 25, 2019 8:33 am
- Full name: .
Re: mmt Vs. Ovyron (G4 D5 BG2)
1. g4 d5 2. c4 Bxg4 3. Bg2 c6 4. Qb3 e6 5. Qxb7 Nd7 6. Nc3 Ne7 7. cxd5 exd5 8. d4 Rb8 9. Qa6 Rb6 10. Qd3 Ng6 11. h3 Be6 12. Nf3 Bd6 13. h4
[d]3qk2r/p2n1ppp/1rpbb1n1/3p4/3P3P/2NQ1N2/PP2PPB1/R1B1K2R b KQk - 0 13
I'm very interested in the response. I've stayed with a larger net based on LC0 Discord recommendations.
[d]3qk2r/p2n1ppp/1rpbb1n1/3p4/3P3P/2NQ1N2/PP2PPB1/R1B1K2R b KQk - 0 13
I'm very interested in the response. I've stayed with a larger net based on LC0 Discord recommendations.
Last edited by mmt on Thu Jan 30, 2020 12:43 pm, edited 1 time in total.
-
- Posts: 343
- Joined: Sun Aug 25, 2019 8:33 am
- Full name: .
Re: mmt Vs. Ovyron (G4 D5 BG2)
I'm using Nibbler for LC0 lately and it doesn't show depth. I'm usually just verifying various LC0 lines in SF but if I run a full long search, it gets to around 51.
Last edited by mmt on Thu Jan 30, 2020 1:04 pm, edited 1 time in total.
-
- Posts: 6442
- Joined: Tue Jan 09, 2007 12:31 am
- Location: PA USA
- Full name: Louis Zulli
Re: mmt Vs. Ovyron (G4 D5 BG2)
Komodo 13.2.5 at depth 45 using MultiPV=3: Black's three best options have evaluations of -1.19, -1.12 and -1.11. Won't give the associated moves!mmt wrote: ↑Thu Jan 30, 2020 12:32 pm 1. g4 d5 2. c4 Bxg4 3. Bg2 c6 4. Qb3 e6 5. Qxb7 Nd7 6. Nc3 Ne7 7. cxd5 exd5 8. d4 Rb8 9. Qa6 Rb6 10. Qd3 Ng6 11. h3 Be6 12. Nf3 Bd6 13. h4
[d]3qk2r/p2n1ppp/1rpbb1n1/3p4/3P3P/2NQ1N2/PP2PPB1/R1B1K2R b KQk - 0 13
I'm very interested in the response. I've stayed with a larger net based on LC0 Discord recommendations.
-
- Posts: 343
- Joined: Sun Aug 25, 2019 8:33 am
- Full name: .
-
- Posts: 6442
- Joined: Tue Jan 09, 2007 12:31 am
- Location: PA USA
- Full name: Louis Zulli
-
- Posts: 1480
- Joined: Mon Apr 23, 2018 7:54 am
Re: mmt Vs. Ovyron (G4 D5 BG2)
This is where it gets interesting -- when move evals are very close. Generally, it could mean the engine doesn't know what to do (or it could mean the moves really are much the same).
-
- Posts: 6442
- Joined: Tue Jan 09, 2007 12:31 am
- Location: PA USA
- Full name: Louis Zulli
Re: mmt Vs. Ovyron (G4 D5 BG2)
Yes. And I didn't check if the three PVs include transpositions and might converge to a common future position ...
-
- Posts: 343
- Joined: Sun Aug 25, 2019 8:33 am
- Full name: .