One more exciting game...Deep Shredder outplayed by Rhetoric
[pgn][Event "3 Minuten/Partie + 3 Sekunden/Zug"]
[Site "rhetoricspiesrutenlauf33, JOEC"]
[Date "2014.09.25"]
[Round "3.5"]
[White "Rhetoric 1.4.1 x64 66"]
[Black "Deep Shredder 12 UCI"]
[Result "1-0"]
[PlyCount "85"]
[EventDate "2014.??.??"]
1. b3 {B 0} c5 {B 0} 2. Nf3 {B 0} d5 {B 0} 3. e3 {B 0} Nf6 {B 0} 4. Bb2 {B 0}
e6 {B 0} 5. d4 {B 0} Nc6 {B 0} 6. Bd3 {B 0} Bd6 {B 0} 7. dxc5 {B 0} Bxc5 {B 0}
8. a3 {B 0} Qe7 {B 0} 9. b4 {B 0} Bb6 {B 0} 10. b5 {0.55/15 8} Na5 {0.32/15 11
(Sb8)} 11. Nbd2 {0.84/14 8 (O-O)} O-O {0.36/13 14 (Sc4)} 12. O-O {0.85/14 8}
Nd7 {0.33/13 10 (Sc4)} 13. Ne5 {0.70/14 7 (c4)} Nc5 {0.00/14 18 (f5)} 14. Qg4 {
1.05/13 7} f6 {0.17/14 31 (Df6)} 15. Ng6 {1.33/15 7} hxg6 {0.00/13 2 (Dd6)} 16.
Bxg6 {1.55/13 2} Rf7 {0.14/14 21} 17. Qh5 {2.08/13 7} Qe8 {0.16/13 12} 18. e4 {
2.08/14 7} dxe4 {0.25/13 10 (Kf8)} 19. Bc3 {2.73/13 7 (Ld4)} e5 {0.72/14 16}
20. Bb4 {2.54/12 7 (Sxe4)} f5 {0.02/12 9} 21. Rad1 {2.52/11 7 (g4)} Be6 {0.01/
12 9} 22. g4 {2.28/11 7 (Lxa5)} Bd7 {1.24/10 25 (Dxb5)} 23. gxf5 {2.80/11 6}
Bxf5 {2.29/13 3} 24. Qh7+ {2.79/15 6} Kf8 {2.21/10 0} 25. Bxf5 {2.79/14 5} Rf6
{2.30/13 2} 26. Qh8+ {2.79/14 6 (Sxe4)} Kf7 {2.36/13 4} 27. Qh5+ {2.81/13 6}
Kf8 {2.23/13 2 (Kg8)} 28. Qg5 {2.36/12 6 (Dg4)} Qf7 {2.23/13 4} 29. Bh7 {2.36/
13 6} Rh6 {2.07/11 1} 30. Nxe4 {2.42/13 6} Rxh7 {2.37/12 1} 31. Nxc5 {2.24/14
6 (Lxc5+)} Kg8 {1.85/11 0} 32. Rd7 {2.19/14 6 (Se4)} Qf6 {2.35/13 9 (Df3)} 33.
Qg2 {2.74/13 6 (Se4)} Qf5 {2.24/10 10 (Kh8)} 34. Ne4 {2.64/12 5 (Tfd1)} Nc4 {
2.65/11 8} 35. Rxb7 {2.73/11 5} Rc8 {2.44/11 2} 36. Kh1 {3.34/14 5 (Td1)} Qf4 {
3.45/12 13 (g6)} 37. Re1 {3.40/11 5} Bd8 {3.44/10 1 (Td8)} 38. Rxa7 {4.08/12 5}
Nb6 {3.94/11 6} 39. a4 {4.27/12 5 (Lc5)} Rc4 {6.30/10 11 (Kh8)} 40. c3 {5.49/
12 5} Rc8 {4.93/10 1 (Tc7)} 41. a5 {6.29/13 5} Nc4 {5.94/11 3} 42. a6 {6.48/13
5 (b6)} Kh8 {5.12/11 2 (Sb6)} 43. Rg1 {7.78/13 5 (Dg3)} 1-0
[/pgn]
Rhetoric 1.4.1 available
Moderators: hgm, Rebel, chrisw
-
- Posts: 48
- Joined: Sun Jan 06, 2013 12:47 pm
- Location: Germany
Re: Rhetoric 1.4.1 5min blitz against spark 1.0.
Don't let Your tricky mind kick You out of paradise!
-
- Posts: 4467
- Joined: Fri Apr 21, 2006 4:19 pm
- Location: IASI - the historical capital of MOLDOVA
- Full name: SilvianR
Re: My test for Rhetoric 1.4.1 (32-bit) is ready !
Nothing sensational !
Sorry !
Take a look here - please:
http://www.talkchess.com/forum/viewtopi ... 865#589865
SR
Sorry !
Take a look here - please:
http://www.talkchess.com/forum/viewtopi ... 865#589865
SR
-
- Posts: 100
- Joined: Tue Oct 15, 2013 5:45 pm
Re: red-flag
Mcafee red-flags the site http://www.chessrhetoric.com/ . Did not face this problem till version 1.2 . Is there any other way of getting the executable?
-
- Posts: 328
- Joined: Mon Jun 11, 2007 6:59 pm
Re: My test for Rhetoric 1.4.1 (32-bit) is ready !
I have completly to disagree.Sylwy wrote:Nothing sensational !
Sorry !
Take a look here - please:
http://www.talkchess.com/forum/viewtopi ... 865#589865
SR
Rhetoric plays a completly different chess as any other chessprogram of the world. This makes it a little sensation. Please don´t bore us with matchresults.
It´s only a matter of time when this thing will be fine too. Today its the time to enjoy its playingstlye.
TL
-
- Posts: 214
- Joined: Thu Sep 01, 2011 5:38 pm
- Location: Seville, Spain
Re: My test for Rhetoric 1.4.1 (32-bit) is ready !
Well, my own tests say that is about 40 elo stronger, and your test result doesn't say the opposite. Too few games to draw any conclusion due to the uncertainities.Sylwy wrote:Nothing sensational !
Sorry !
Take a look here - please:
http://www.talkchess.com/forum/viewtopi ... 865#589865
SR
At least it isn't worse!
I have to work a lot in the endgame eval to climb in elo terms. Frank Quisinski is testing it intensively just now and has reported that seems to be similar in strength to Crafty 24.0. Still need more games, but there must be a jump in the Ccrl list.
All this joined to a nice playing style.
Still learning how to play chess...
knigths move in "L" shape ¿right?
knigths move in "L" shape ¿right?
-
- Posts: 214
- Joined: Thu Sep 01, 2011 5:38 pm
- Location: Seville, Spain
Re: red-flag
I don't know why is this happening. I use avast and don't face this problem.pkumar wrote:Mcafee red-flags the site http://www.chessrhetoric.com/ . Did not face this problem till version 1.2 . Is there any other way of getting the executable?
Sorry.
Still learning how to play chess...
knigths move in "L" shape ¿right?
knigths move in "L" shape ¿right?
-
- Posts: 4467
- Joined: Fri Apr 21, 2006 4:19 pm
- Location: IASI - the historical capital of MOLDOVA
- Full name: SilvianR
Re: Hocus-pocus !
1.-OK ! The post doesn't exist for you !Thomas Lagershausen wrote: 1.- Please don´t bore us with matchresults.
2.-Today its the time to enjoy its playingstlye.
2.-OK again ! It's Oktoberfest in Germany ! Until the 3-rd of October !
Enough ? Then........CCRL, CEGT & Co. will act !
Herr Silvian von IASI
-
- Posts: 736
- Joined: Wed Dec 02, 2009 9:48 am
Re: red-flag
Bitdefender was okay with the down load but when I tried to use the engine it claimed it was a malicious file and deleted it from my computer. Same thing happened with the Naum 4.6 release today.asanjuan wrote:I don't know why is this happening. I use avast and don't face this problem.pkumar wrote:Mcafee red-flags the site http://www.chessrhetoric.com/ . Did not face this problem till version 1.2 . Is there any other way of getting the executable?
Sorry.
BUT Smarthink 1.70 gets a clean pass from BitDefender.
-
- Posts: 364
- Joined: Sun Oct 04, 2009 1:27 pm
- Location: Italy
Re: red-flag
Sometimes mcafee and some other antivirus find a false positive.
I would suggest, in dubious cases, to submit the file to VirusTotal, that gives results from something like 40 antiviruses. If the positive answer is limited to one or two antivirus out of 40, I would be rather confident that this is a false positive...
I would suggest, in dubious cases, to submit the file to VirusTotal, that gives results from something like 40 antiviruses. If the positive answer is limited to one or two antivirus out of 40, I would be rather confident that this is a false positive...
-
- Posts: 100
- Joined: Tue Oct 15, 2013 5:45 pm
Re: red-flag?
I downloaded the Rhetoric 1.4.1 executables by puppy linux and submitted to VirusTotal. The url also was scanned. Nothing suspicious was found. Thanks for the suggestion.noctiferus wrote:Sometimes mcafee and some other antivirus find a false positive.
I would suggest, in dubious cases, to submit the file to VirusTotal, that gives results from something like 40 antiviruses. If the positive answer is limited to one or two antivirus out of 40, I would be rather confident that this is a false positive...