Strange analysis by Chess Tiger 2007

Discussion of anything and everything relating to chess playing software and machines.

Moderator: Ras

Karmazen & Oliver
Posts: 374
Joined: Sat Mar 10, 2007 12:34 am

Re: Strange analysis by Chess Tiger 2007

Post by Karmazen & Oliver »

Kaj Soderberg wrote:
Uri Blass wrote:I believe that extensions is not the only problem here and chess tiger is simply not reliable tool for analysis because it is a preprocessor that means that it can evaluate the same position in different way dependent on the root position.

Uri
I have also noticed that CT2007 is not at it's best when changing from middle game to endgame. Just after the queen has been exchanged, say 3 forced plies later, CT comes with an altogether different evaluation of the situation and that already at a very low ply level after the exchange, so it is not only so that the evaluation changes because new and much deeper ply depths have been reached. BTW This also goes for the predecessors of CT2007, so there is structurally something not completely right in this otherwise fine animal.

Best regards,

Kaj
yeah.. I´m thinking that Ct2007 evaluate his Knights (horses ;-) ) on a lot of points... in middle game is correct because Knights are very taltical positions... his evaluation change after Queens out... because have more plys ....

bye...