Tough test position

[Cubeman]

wow! impressive by bright. Is bright good at these things?

Quite often in "find the winning move posts" Bright is super fast.I don't know how that relates to the actual playing strenght.But from what I gather if chess was all about combinations then Bright would lead the Rating lists!!

[maxchgr]

what engine it play similar to (style)?

[Ovyron]

what engine it play similar to (style)?

Maybe someone can compare it but to me Bright's style is unique. And it also has the highest percentage of decided games on my setup, meaning it's an engine not very happy with a draw, and I think that means it'll never give up and will try to win its games.

[BBauer]

Hi,
this is on a AMD X2 5200+

Code: Select all

[D]2r2r1k/pp1b2pp/3b3q/5p2/1P1Pn3/P2BN1P1/1B3PQP/R3R1K1 b - - 0 21 

Toga II 1.4.2JD:
 13/33	00:07	   5.125.282	1.499.014	-0,74	a7a5 b4xa5 Bd6c7 f2f3 Ne4d6 Ne3d5
 13/34	00:07	   4.894.641	1.499.014	-0,66	a7a5 b4xa5 Bd6c7 f2f3 Ne4d6 Ne3d5
 14/34	00:14	  10.882.772	1.541.496	-0,86	a7a5 b4xa5 Bd6c7 a5a6 b7xa6 f2f3
 15/34	00:36	  28.619.828	1.579.600	-0,93	a7a5 b4xa5 Bd6c7 a5a6 b7xa6 f2f3
 15/47	00:47	  37.134.631	1.588.315	-0,83	Rc8e8 f2f4 Rf8f6 Ne3g4 f5xg4 Bd3xe4
 15/45	00:53	  38.981.978	1.586.482	-0,70	Rf8e8 Ra1c1 Rc8xc1 Bb2xc1 Qh6g6 Ne3c4
 16/47	01:12	  57.765.848	1.594.812	-0,91	Rf8e8 Ne3c4 b7b5 Nc4xd6 Qh6xd6 Bd3xe4
 16/45	01:12	  54.159.332	1.594.812	-0,78	Rf8e8 Ne3c4 b7b5 Nc4xd6 Qh6xd6 Bd3xe4
 16/47	02:07	 100.043.466	1.573.222	-0,14	Ne4xf2 Qg2xf2 f5f4 Re1e2 f4xg3 Qf2g2
 16/59	02:07	  98.501.195	1.572.160	+0,19	Ne4xf2 Qg2xf2 f5f4 Re1e2 f4xg3 Qf2g2
 17/52	02:25	 114.876.155	1.583.196	+0,18	Ne4xf2 Qg2xf2 f5f4 g3xf4 Rf8xf4 Qf2g2
 18/52	02:54	 139.674.446	1.608.508	+0,46	Ne4xf2 Qg2xf2 f5f4 g3xf4 Rf8xf4 Qf2g2
 19/52	03:43	 184.997.377	1.656.196	+0,33	Ne4xf2 Qg2xf2 f5f4 g3xf4 Rf8xf4 Qf2g2
 19/59	03:43	 176.187.764	1.656.196	+0,37	Ne4xf2 Qg2xf2 f5f4 g3xf4 Rf8xf4 Qf2g2
 20/55	05:31	 283.470.470	1.713.310	+0,25	Ne4xf2 Qg2xf2 f5f4 g3xf4 Rf8xf4 Qf2g2
 20/59	05:35	 266.799.484	1.713.641	+0,50	Ne4xf2 Qg2xf2 f5f4 g3xf4 Rf8xf4 Qf2g2
 21/69	16:35	 861.015.718	1.730.585	+1,09	Ne4xf2 Qg2xf2 f5f4 Ne3f5 Bd7xf5 Bd3xf5

[Guetti]

Hi,
this is on a AMD X2 5200+

Code: Select all

[D]2r2r1k/pp1b2pp/3b3q/5p2/1P1Pn3/P2BN1P1/1B3PQP/R3R1K1 b - - 0 21 

Toga II 1.4.2JD:
 13/33	00:07	   5.125.282	1.499.014	-0,74	a7a5 b4xa5 Bd6c7 f2f3 Ne4d6 Ne3d5
 13/34	00:07	   4.894.641	1.499.014	-0,66	a7a5 b4xa5 Bd6c7 f2f3 Ne4d6 Ne3d5
 14/34	00:14	  10.882.772	1.541.496	-0,86	a7a5 b4xa5 Bd6c7 a5a6 b7xa6 f2f3
 15/34	00:36	  28.619.828	1.579.600	-0,93	a7a5 b4xa5 Bd6c7 a5a6 b7xa6 f2f3
 15/47	00:47	  37.134.631	1.588.315	-0,83	Rc8e8 f2f4 Rf8f6 Ne3g4 f5xg4 Bd3xe4
 15/45	00:53	  38.981.978	1.586.482	-0,70	Rf8e8 Ra1c1 Rc8xc1 Bb2xc1 Qh6g6 Ne3c4
 16/47	01:12	  57.765.848	1.594.812	-0,91	Rf8e8 Ne3c4 b7b5 Nc4xd6 Qh6xd6 Bd3xe4
 16/45	01:12	  54.159.332	1.594.812	-0,78	Rf8e8 Ne3c4 b7b5 Nc4xd6 Qh6xd6 Bd3xe4
 16/47	02:07	 100.043.466	1.573.222	-0,14	Ne4xf2 Qg2xf2 f5f4 Re1e2 f4xg3 Qf2g2
 16/59	02:07	  98.501.195	1.572.160	+0,19	Ne4xf2 Qg2xf2 f5f4 Re1e2 f4xg3 Qf2g2
 17/52	02:25	 114.876.155	1.583.196	+0,18	Ne4xf2 Qg2xf2 f5f4 g3xf4 Rf8xf4 Qf2g2
 18/52	02:54	 139.674.446	1.608.508	+0,46	Ne4xf2 Qg2xf2 f5f4 g3xf4 Rf8xf4 Qf2g2
 19/52	03:43	 184.997.377	1.656.196	+0,33	Ne4xf2 Qg2xf2 f5f4 g3xf4 Rf8xf4 Qf2g2
 19/59	03:43	 176.187.764	1.656.196	+0,37	Ne4xf2 Qg2xf2 f5f4 g3xf4 Rf8xf4 Qf2g2
 20/55	05:31	 283.470.470	1.713.310	+0,25	Ne4xf2 Qg2xf2 f5f4 g3xf4 Rf8xf4 Qf2g2
 20/59	05:35	 266.799.484	1.713.641	+0,50	Ne4xf2 Qg2xf2 f5f4 g3xf4 Rf8xf4 Qf2g2
 21/69	16:35	 861.015.718	1.730.585	+1,09	Ne4xf2 Qg2xf2 f5f4 Ne3f5 Bd7xf5 Bd3xf5

Hm, what do the numbers in the third row indicate?
If they represent total nodes, then I wonder how can the number decrease at depth 16? Confused.

[BBauer]

This is simple arena output.
regards
Bernhard