Moderator: Ras
It is very easy and I found it almost instantly. No need to test programs with this problem unless they are very weak.yanquis1972 wrote:[d]8/2p2p2/p1N2k1P/8/1P6/P3K3/8/5b2 w - - 1 44
FEN: 8/2p2p2/p1N2k1P/8/1P6/P3K3/8/5b2 w - - 1 44
carlsen here played Ne5! winning.
Problem is both moves are based on the same idea, the knight can't be taken by the king else the h-pawn runs in and promotes...Terry McCracken wrote:It is very easy and I found it almost instantly. No need to test programs with this problem unless they are very weak.yanquis1972 wrote:[d]8/2p2p2/p1N2k1P/8/1P6/P3K3/8/5b2 w - - 1 44
FEN: 8/2p2p2/p1N2k1P/8/1P6/P3K3/8/5b2 w - - 1 44
carlsen here played Ne5! winning.
I wouldn't say that - Deep Shredder 11 on a quad isn't exactly weak, and it gives +4.82 for Ne7.Terry McCracken wrote: It is very easy and I found it almost instantly. No need to test programs with this problem unless they are very weak.
There are two moves that win almost equally on first sight Ne5 and Ne7, I suppose Ne5 is more flexable. Other than the two moves this isnt all that interesting for computers. It is instructive for intermediate players however.Spock wrote:I wouldn't say that - Deep Shredder 11 on a quad isn't exactly weak, and it gives +4.82 for Ne7.Terry McCracken wrote: It is very easy and I found it almost instantly. No need to test programs with this problem unless they are very weak.