Obviously one would expect the openings advisor feature to add some advantage. It was a matter of determining how much.IWB wrote:Hi,
Isn't that what you expect of an "opening advisior"?
I wam fine with that result!
Bye
Ingo
Cheers,
Graham.
Moderator: Ras
Obviously one would expect the openings advisor feature to add some advantage. It was a matter of determining how much.IWB wrote:Hi,
Isn't that what you expect of an "opening advisior"?
I wam fine with that result!
Bye
Ingo
Ok, and if it is part of the engine the question is: Why switch it off? what is the intention of testing it on or off and why is there a possibility to switch it off at all?Graham Banks wrote:
Obviously one would expect the openings advisor feature to add some advantage. It was a matter of determining how much.
Cheers,
Graham.
Read here:IWB wrote: Ok, and if it is part of the engine the question is: Why switch it off? what is the intention of testing it on or off and why is there a possibility to switch it off at all?
Maybe it's intended for some analysis situations, if the user thinks a particular position shouldn't be treated like an opening position, e.g. even if the developement isn't finished yet?Vinvin wrote:I wonder why "OA off" exists
Still no more than 10-30 elo difference depending on which list you look at.Graham Banks wrote:It would seem that OA On has about a 15 elo advantage based on CCRL 40/40 and 40/4 testing.