Hi Graham just want to know if the two versions of Deuterium have the same starting opening after 16 games? The new version is showing lazyness I think . My test on fast time control does not promise at all so far at this point . Anyhow I can still learn a lot from this result even if this version is a failure.
Ferdy wrote:Hi Graham just want to know if the two versions of Deuterium have the same starting opening after 16 games? The new version is showing lazyness I think . My test on fast time control does not promise at all so far at this point . Anyhow I can still learn a lot from this result even if this version is a failure.
Hi Ferdinand,
Offhand, I have no idea whether or not the same openings have been used. I'm not using the most recent version of ChessGUI for this particular tournament, so I suspect not.
Too early to make an accurate judgement as to whether this latest version is stronger or not. You'll need to keep an eye on all rating lists that are testing it to see whether or not there's a trend.
AMD64x2 Dual Core
ChessGUI
128mb hash each
3-4-5 piece tablebases
Ponder off
Perfect2010.cgb book
40 moves in 38 minutes repeating (adapted for the CCRL)
All engines 32-bit 1CPU
2 cycles 30 rounds
AMD64x2 Dual Core
ChessGUI
128mb hash each
3-4-5 piece tablebases
Ponder off
Perfect2010.cgb book
40 moves in 38 minutes repeating (adapted for the CCRL)
All engines 32-bit 1CPU
2 cycles 30 rounds
AMD64x2 Dual Core
ChessGUI
128mb hash each
3-4-5 piece tablebases
Ponder off
Perfect2010.cgb book
40 moves in 38 minutes repeating (adapted for the CCRL)
All engines 32-bit 1CPU
2 cycles 30 rounds