Another nice tournament Andi.
Is there any reason why you're not using Deep Rybka 4.1 or Stockfish 2.3.1?
Graham.
TBOC 5 : very long time cont tour with new komodo hiarcs
Moderator: Ras
-
Graham Banks
- Posts: 44665
- Joined: Sun Feb 26, 2006 10:52 am
- Location: Auckland, NZ
Re: TBOC 5 : very long time cont tour with new komodo hiarcs
gbanksnz at gmail.com
-
Alibaba
- Posts: 1218
- Joined: Mon May 25, 2009 12:16 am
Re: TBOC 5 : very long time cont tour with new komodo hiarcs
Hi,
yes the reasons are:
1.) i don't have Rybka 4.1
2.) at the time i started this tour the best SF versions was the 2.2.2....
Regards
Andi
yes the reasons are:
1.) i don't have Rybka 4.1
2.) at the time i started this tour the best SF versions was the 2.2.2....
Regards
Andi
-
Graham Banks
- Posts: 44665
- Joined: Sun Feb 26, 2006 10:52 am
- Location: Auckland, NZ
Re: TBOC 5 : very long time cont tour with new komodo hiarcs
No problem. Not a criticism.Alibaba wrote:Hi,
yes the reasons are:
1.) i don't have Rybka 4.1
2.) at the time i started this tour the best SF versions was the 2.2.2....
Regards
Andi
I'd thought that Rybka 4.1 was a free update, but I was obviously wrong.
Stockfish 2.2.2 is pretty much the same strength as 2.3.1, so not much lost there.
Keep up the great tournaments.
Graham.
gbanksnz at gmail.com
-
Vinvin
- Posts: 5298
- Joined: Thu Mar 09, 2006 9:40 am
- Full name: Vincent Lejeune
Re: TBOC 5 : very long time cont tour with new komodo hiarcs
The upgrade R4 to 4.1 is free : http://rybkaforum.net/cgi-bin/rybkaforu ... ?tid=21098Alibaba wrote:Hi,
yes the reasons are:
1.) i don't have Rybka 4.1
2.) at the time i started this tour the best SF versions was the 2.2.2....
Regards
Andi
-
Alibaba
- Posts: 1218
- Joined: Mon May 25, 2009 12:16 am
Re: TBOC 5 : very long time cont tour with new komodo hiarcs
Hi,
after 6 rounds here is the latest table:
TBOC_5 2012
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8
1 Houdini 1.5a x64 ** 1 ½ 1 ½ ½ ½ 4.0/6 12.25
2 Komodo 5 64-bit 0 ** ½ ½ 1 1 1 4.0/6 9.75
3 Critter 1.6a 64-bit ½ ** ½ ½ ½ ½ 1 3.5/6
4 Deep HIARCS 14 WCSC 0 ½ ½ ** ½ 1 ½ 3.0/6
5 Deep Rybka 4 x64 ½ ½ ½ ** ½ 0 ½ 2.5/6 8.00
6 Stockfish 2.2.2 JA SSE42 ½ 0 ½ ½ ½ ** ½ 2.5/6 7.75
7 Deep Fritz 13 0 ½ 0 1 ½ ** ½ 2.5/6 6.50
8 Deep Junior 13.3 ½ 0 0 ½ ½ ½ ** 2.0/6
Regards
Andi
after 6 rounds here is the latest table:
TBOC_5 2012
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8
1 Houdini 1.5a x64 ** 1 ½ 1 ½ ½ ½ 4.0/6 12.25
2 Komodo 5 64-bit 0 ** ½ ½ 1 1 1 4.0/6 9.75
3 Critter 1.6a 64-bit ½ ** ½ ½ ½ ½ 1 3.5/6
4 Deep HIARCS 14 WCSC 0 ½ ½ ** ½ 1 ½ 3.0/6
5 Deep Rybka 4 x64 ½ ½ ½ ** ½ 0 ½ 2.5/6 8.00
6 Stockfish 2.2.2 JA SSE42 ½ 0 ½ ½ ½ ** ½ 2.5/6 7.75
7 Deep Fritz 13 0 ½ 0 1 ½ ** ½ 2.5/6 6.50
8 Deep Junior 13.3 ½ 0 0 ½ ½ ½ ** 2.0/6
Regards
Andi
-
lkaufman
- Posts: 6259
- Joined: Sun Jan 10, 2010 6:15 am
- Location: Maryland USA
- Full name: Larry Kaufman
Re: TBOC 5 : very long time cont tour with new komodo hiarcs
Wow, Komodo is tied for the lead giving everyone else 2 cores to 1 handicap! That's a great result.Alibaba wrote:Hi,
after 6 rounds here is the latest table:
TBOC_5 2012
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8
1 Houdini 1.5a x64 ** 1 ½ 1 ½ ½ ½ 4.0/6 12.25
2 Komodo 5 64-bit 0 ** ½ ½ 1 1 1 4.0/6 9.75
3 Critter 1.6a 64-bit ½ ** ½ ½ ½ ½ 1 3.5/6
4 Deep HIARCS 14 WCSC 0 ½ ½ ** ½ 1 ½ 3.0/6
5 Deep Rybka 4 x64 ½ ½ ½ ** ½ 0 ½ 2.5/6 8.00
6 Stockfish 2.2.2 JA SSE42 ½ 0 ½ ½ ½ ** ½ 2.5/6 7.75
7 Deep Fritz 13 0 ½ 0 1 ½ ** ½ 2.5/6 6.50
8 Deep Junior 13.3 ½ 0 0 ½ ½ ½ ** 2.0/6
Regards
Andi
-
Alibaba
- Posts: 1218
- Joined: Mon May 25, 2009 12:16 am
Re: TBOC 5 : very long time cont tour with new komodo hiarcs
Hi,
yes the performance of Komodo 5 at this very long time controls is really impressive....
after 7 rounds, here is the new table:
TBOC_5 2012
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8
1 Houdini 1.5a x64 ** 1 ½ 1 ½ ½ ½ ½ 4.5/7 16.00
2 Komodo 5 64-bit 0 ** ½ ½ 1 1 ½ 1 4.5/7 13.75
3 Critter 1.6a 64-bit ½ ½ ** ½ ½ ½ ½ 1 4.0/7 13.25
4 Deep HIARCS 14 WCSC 0 ½ ½ ** ½ 1 1 ½ 4.0/7 12.50
5 Stockfish 2.2.2 JA SSE42 ½ 0 ½ ½ ** ½ ½ ½ 3.0/7 10.25
6 Deep Fritz 13 ½ 0 ½ 0 ½ ** 1 ½ 3.0/7 9.50
7 Deep Rybka 4 x64 ½ ½ ½ 0 ½ 0 ** ½ 2.5/7 9.25
8 Deep Junior 13.3 ½ 0 0 ½ ½ ½ ½ ** 2.5/7 8.50
Regards
Andi
yes the performance of Komodo 5 at this very long time controls is really impressive....
after 7 rounds, here is the new table:
TBOC_5 2012
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8
1 Houdini 1.5a x64 ** 1 ½ 1 ½ ½ ½ ½ 4.5/7 16.00
2 Komodo 5 64-bit 0 ** ½ ½ 1 1 ½ 1 4.5/7 13.75
3 Critter 1.6a 64-bit ½ ½ ** ½ ½ ½ ½ 1 4.0/7 13.25
4 Deep HIARCS 14 WCSC 0 ½ ½ ** ½ 1 1 ½ 4.0/7 12.50
5 Stockfish 2.2.2 JA SSE42 ½ 0 ½ ½ ** ½ ½ ½ 3.0/7 10.25
6 Deep Fritz 13 ½ 0 ½ 0 ½ ** 1 ½ 3.0/7 9.50
7 Deep Rybka 4 x64 ½ ½ ½ 0 ½ 0 ** ½ 2.5/7 9.25
8 Deep Junior 13.3 ½ 0 0 ½ ½ ½ ½ ** 2.5/7 8.50
Regards
Andi
-
Alibaba
- Posts: 1218
- Joined: Mon May 25, 2009 12:16 am
Re: TBOC 5 : very long time cont tour with new komodo hiarcs
Hi,
lets have a look to the fine play of the komodo engine in the game vs DF 13.
[Event "TBOC_5"]
[Site "?"]
[Date "2012.09.01"]
[Round "1.1"]
[White "Deep Fritz 13"]
[Black "Komodo 5 64-bit"]
[Result "0-1"]
[ECO "C89"]
[Annotator "0.40;0.24"]
[PlyCount "152"]
[EventDate "2012.08.31"]
[EventType "tourn"]
[Source "Wutzke"]
{Intel(R) Core(TM) i7-2600 CPU @ 3.40GHz 3411 MHz W=28.4 plies; 7.098kN/s; 25.
261.436 TBAs B=27.4 plies; 2.067kN/s} 1. e4 e5 2. Nf3 Nc6 3. Bb5 a6 4. Ba4 Nf6
5. O-O Be7 6. Re1 b5 7. Bb3 O-O 8. c3 d5 9. exd5 {0.40/28 487} Nxd5 {0.24/21 61
} 10. Nxe5 {0.41/27 146} Nxe5 {0.24/25 44} 11. Rxe5 {0.41/26 141} c6 {0.21/26
73} 12. Re1 {0.54/23 186 (d4)} Bd6 {0.33/26 555 (Lf5)} 13. d4 {0.62/25 370} Qh4
{0.31/26 242} 14. g3 {0.61/29 24} Qh3 {0.32/24 52} 15. Bxd5 {0.54/28 232 (De2)}
cxd5 {0.13/24 42} 16. Qf3 {0.57/30 399} Bf5 {0.13/29 206 (Df5)} 17. Qxd5 {0.61/
30 301} Rfe8 {0.13/29 378 (Tae8)} 18. Bd2 {0.32/28 627} Rad8 {0.13/28 395} 19.
Qf3 {0.25/29 536 (Sa3)} Be6 {0.13/27 421} 20. Na3 {0.21/27 5 (a4)} Bf8 {0.01/
28 816} 21. Qg2 {0.21/31 0} Qh5 {-0.06/28 672 (Df5)} 22. f4 {0.11/26 319 (Te5)}
Bf5 {-0.17/27 963 (Ld5)} 23. Rac1 {0.00/26 293 (Te5)} Qg6 {-0.21/23 120} 24.
Re5 {0.00/29 316 (Df2)} f6 {-0.37/27 630 (Le4)} 25. Rxe8 {0.00/31 443} Rxe8 {
-0.37/28 9} 26. Re1 {0.00/31 431} Rxe1+ {-0.28/28 45 (Le4)} 27. Bxe1 {0.00/30
84} Qf7 {-0.35/27 60 (De8)} 28. b4 {0.00/29 308} Qe6 {-0.34/29 172} 29. Qd2 {
0.00/32 163} Qe4 {-0.37/27 112} 30. Qf2 {0.00/33 348} g6 {-0.40/28 0 (Le6)} 31.
Bd2 {0.00/32 677} Kf7 {-0.40/29 123} 32. Be1 {0.00/32 448} h5 {-0.39/29 287
(Kg8)} 33. h4 {0.00/31 429 (Ld2)} Be7 {-0.42/28 461 (Le6)} 34. Bd2 {-0.21/25
309} Be6 {-0.29/28 1621} 35. Qe1 {-0.07/32 0 (Dg2)} Qf3 {-0.24/30 917 (Df5)}
36. Qe3 {-0.08/31 467} Qxe3+ {-0.24/31 194 (Dd5)} 37. Bxe3 {0.00/32 45} Bxa2 {
-0.24/27 9} 38. Bd2 {-0.05/34 328 (Kf2)} Ke6 {-0.37/31 340 (Lb3)} 39. Kf2 {-0.
05/35 345} Kd5 {-0.31/29 45 (Lb3)} 40. Ke3 {-0.05/33 316} g5 {-0.46/28 210
(Lb3)} 41. fxg5 {-0.13/31 179} fxg5 {-0.39/32 31} 42. Be1 {-0.15/32 162} g4 {
-0.41/33 294} 43. Nc2 {-0.17/37 0} Bd6 {-0.41/34 354 (Lf8)} 44. Ke2 {-0.17/37
169 (Kd3)} Bc4+ {-0.34/34 390 (Ke4)} 45. Ke3 {-0.17/39 216} Bf8 {-0.41/36 172}
46. Kf2 {-0.17/39 132} Ke4 {-0.41/37 29 (Lb3)} 47. Ne3 {-0.28/41 743} Bf7 {-0.
43/38 116 (La2)} 48. Ke2 {-0.28/38 151 (Sg2)} Bd6 {-0.29/36 390} 49. Bf2 {-0.
28/39 0 (Sg2)} Bb3 {-0.30/34 92 (La2)} 50. Be1 {-0.28/39 253} Bc7 {-0.22/35
691 (La2)} 51. Bf2 {-0.28/38 200 (Sg2)} a5 {-0.87/26 34 (Lg8)} 52. bxa5 {-0.28/
37 194} Bxa5 {-0.71/32 17} 53. Be1 {-0.28/38 143} Bb6 {-0.65/33 33 (Lc7)} 54.
Bd2 {-0.29/35 185 (Lf2)} b4 {-1.07/29 76 (Lc7)} 55. Be1 {-0.67/34 179} Ba4 {-1.
08/31 73 (Le6)} 56. cxb4 {-1.62/34 164} Bb5+ {-1.97/31 598 (Lxd4)} 57. Kd2 {-1.
62/38 300} Bxd4 {-2.13/32 581} 58. Ng2 {-1.62/39 0} Be5 {-2.27/30 256 (Kf3)}
59. Kc2 {-1.62/38 248 (Kd1)} Kf3 {-3.47/31 105} 60. Nf4 {-1.62/37 849} Bxf4 {
-7.88/36 196} 61. gxf4 {-11.56/29 0} g3 {-15.13/26 62} 62. Bc3 {-#95/27 809
(Lxg3)} Ke4 {-19.14/26 133} 63. Be1 {-#85/20 17} Kxf4 {-20.98/28 28} 64. Bd2+ {
-#84/20 8} Kf3 {-56.94/27 1063 (Kg4)} 65. Bc3 {-#81/18 7} Kg4 {#1795/23 323
(g2)} 66. Bd4 {-#80/17 9 (Lf6)} Kxh4 {-#21/20 21} 67. Bf6+ {-#70/18 4 (Kc3)}
Kg4 {-#20/19 14} 68. Bh8 {-#64/15 0 (Kc3)} h4 {-#12/19 39 (g2)} 69. Be5 {-#42/
13 0 (Lb2)} h3 {-#11/18 430} 70. Bd6 {-#37/13 0 (Kb3)} h2 {-#10/17 113 (g2)}
71. Kd2 {-#23/11 0 (Lc5)} h1=Q {-#8/17 11} 72. Be7 {-#17/9 0 (Lc5)} Qb1 {-#7/
16 86 (Dh2+)} 73. Kc3 {-#12/8 0 (Lf6)} Qc1+ {-#4/13 27 (De1+)} 74. Kd4 {-#4/9 0
} Kf5 {-#3/14 181} 75. Bd6 {-#2/7 0 (Kd5)} Qc4+ {-#2/13 334} 76. Ke3 {-#1/7 0}
Qd3# {-#1/14 10} 0-1
Regards
Andi
lets have a look to the fine play of the komodo engine in the game vs DF 13.
[Event "TBOC_5"]
[Site "?"]
[Date "2012.09.01"]
[Round "1.1"]
[White "Deep Fritz 13"]
[Black "Komodo 5 64-bit"]
[Result "0-1"]
[ECO "C89"]
[Annotator "0.40;0.24"]
[PlyCount "152"]
[EventDate "2012.08.31"]
[EventType "tourn"]
[Source "Wutzke"]
{Intel(R) Core(TM) i7-2600 CPU @ 3.40GHz 3411 MHz W=28.4 plies; 7.098kN/s; 25.
261.436 TBAs B=27.4 plies; 2.067kN/s} 1. e4 e5 2. Nf3 Nc6 3. Bb5 a6 4. Ba4 Nf6
5. O-O Be7 6. Re1 b5 7. Bb3 O-O 8. c3 d5 9. exd5 {0.40/28 487} Nxd5 {0.24/21 61
} 10. Nxe5 {0.41/27 146} Nxe5 {0.24/25 44} 11. Rxe5 {0.41/26 141} c6 {0.21/26
73} 12. Re1 {0.54/23 186 (d4)} Bd6 {0.33/26 555 (Lf5)} 13. d4 {0.62/25 370} Qh4
{0.31/26 242} 14. g3 {0.61/29 24} Qh3 {0.32/24 52} 15. Bxd5 {0.54/28 232 (De2)}
cxd5 {0.13/24 42} 16. Qf3 {0.57/30 399} Bf5 {0.13/29 206 (Df5)} 17. Qxd5 {0.61/
30 301} Rfe8 {0.13/29 378 (Tae8)} 18. Bd2 {0.32/28 627} Rad8 {0.13/28 395} 19.
Qf3 {0.25/29 536 (Sa3)} Be6 {0.13/27 421} 20. Na3 {0.21/27 5 (a4)} Bf8 {0.01/
28 816} 21. Qg2 {0.21/31 0} Qh5 {-0.06/28 672 (Df5)} 22. f4 {0.11/26 319 (Te5)}
Bf5 {-0.17/27 963 (Ld5)} 23. Rac1 {0.00/26 293 (Te5)} Qg6 {-0.21/23 120} 24.
Re5 {0.00/29 316 (Df2)} f6 {-0.37/27 630 (Le4)} 25. Rxe8 {0.00/31 443} Rxe8 {
-0.37/28 9} 26. Re1 {0.00/31 431} Rxe1+ {-0.28/28 45 (Le4)} 27. Bxe1 {0.00/30
84} Qf7 {-0.35/27 60 (De8)} 28. b4 {0.00/29 308} Qe6 {-0.34/29 172} 29. Qd2 {
0.00/32 163} Qe4 {-0.37/27 112} 30. Qf2 {0.00/33 348} g6 {-0.40/28 0 (Le6)} 31.
Bd2 {0.00/32 677} Kf7 {-0.40/29 123} 32. Be1 {0.00/32 448} h5 {-0.39/29 287
(Kg8)} 33. h4 {0.00/31 429 (Ld2)} Be7 {-0.42/28 461 (Le6)} 34. Bd2 {-0.21/25
309} Be6 {-0.29/28 1621} 35. Qe1 {-0.07/32 0 (Dg2)} Qf3 {-0.24/30 917 (Df5)}
36. Qe3 {-0.08/31 467} Qxe3+ {-0.24/31 194 (Dd5)} 37. Bxe3 {0.00/32 45} Bxa2 {
-0.24/27 9} 38. Bd2 {-0.05/34 328 (Kf2)} Ke6 {-0.37/31 340 (Lb3)} 39. Kf2 {-0.
05/35 345} Kd5 {-0.31/29 45 (Lb3)} 40. Ke3 {-0.05/33 316} g5 {-0.46/28 210
(Lb3)} 41. fxg5 {-0.13/31 179} fxg5 {-0.39/32 31} 42. Be1 {-0.15/32 162} g4 {
-0.41/33 294} 43. Nc2 {-0.17/37 0} Bd6 {-0.41/34 354 (Lf8)} 44. Ke2 {-0.17/37
169 (Kd3)} Bc4+ {-0.34/34 390 (Ke4)} 45. Ke3 {-0.17/39 216} Bf8 {-0.41/36 172}
46. Kf2 {-0.17/39 132} Ke4 {-0.41/37 29 (Lb3)} 47. Ne3 {-0.28/41 743} Bf7 {-0.
43/38 116 (La2)} 48. Ke2 {-0.28/38 151 (Sg2)} Bd6 {-0.29/36 390} 49. Bf2 {-0.
28/39 0 (Sg2)} Bb3 {-0.30/34 92 (La2)} 50. Be1 {-0.28/39 253} Bc7 {-0.22/35
691 (La2)} 51. Bf2 {-0.28/38 200 (Sg2)} a5 {-0.87/26 34 (Lg8)} 52. bxa5 {-0.28/
37 194} Bxa5 {-0.71/32 17} 53. Be1 {-0.28/38 143} Bb6 {-0.65/33 33 (Lc7)} 54.
Bd2 {-0.29/35 185 (Lf2)} b4 {-1.07/29 76 (Lc7)} 55. Be1 {-0.67/34 179} Ba4 {-1.
08/31 73 (Le6)} 56. cxb4 {-1.62/34 164} Bb5+ {-1.97/31 598 (Lxd4)} 57. Kd2 {-1.
62/38 300} Bxd4 {-2.13/32 581} 58. Ng2 {-1.62/39 0} Be5 {-2.27/30 256 (Kf3)}
59. Kc2 {-1.62/38 248 (Kd1)} Kf3 {-3.47/31 105} 60. Nf4 {-1.62/37 849} Bxf4 {
-7.88/36 196} 61. gxf4 {-11.56/29 0} g3 {-15.13/26 62} 62. Bc3 {-#95/27 809
(Lxg3)} Ke4 {-19.14/26 133} 63. Be1 {-#85/20 17} Kxf4 {-20.98/28 28} 64. Bd2+ {
-#84/20 8} Kf3 {-56.94/27 1063 (Kg4)} 65. Bc3 {-#81/18 7} Kg4 {#1795/23 323
(g2)} 66. Bd4 {-#80/17 9 (Lf6)} Kxh4 {-#21/20 21} 67. Bf6+ {-#70/18 4 (Kc3)}
Kg4 {-#20/19 14} 68. Bh8 {-#64/15 0 (Kc3)} h4 {-#12/19 39 (g2)} 69. Be5 {-#42/
13 0 (Lb2)} h3 {-#11/18 430} 70. Bd6 {-#37/13 0 (Kb3)} h2 {-#10/17 113 (g2)}
71. Kd2 {-#23/11 0 (Lc5)} h1=Q {-#8/17 11} 72. Be7 {-#17/9 0 (Lc5)} Qb1 {-#7/
16 86 (Dh2+)} 73. Kc3 {-#12/8 0 (Lf6)} Qc1+ {-#4/13 27 (De1+)} 74. Kd4 {-#4/9 0
} Kf5 {-#3/14 181} 75. Bd6 {-#2/7 0 (Kd5)} Qc4+ {-#2/13 334} 76. Ke3 {-#1/7 0}
Qd3# {-#1/14 10} 0-1
Regards
Andi
-
lkaufman
- Posts: 6259
- Joined: Sun Jan 10, 2010 6:15 am
- Location: Maryland USA
- Full name: Larry Kaufman
Re: TBOC 5 : very long time cont tour with new komodo hiarcs
What's the overall White-Black score? I happen to have a special interest in the Marshall Gambit, even though I rarely actually play it. It has always been one of my goals to have Komodo evaluate it properly (with enough analysis) as close to equal, since that is the accepted GM eval for it. So far though I can't get the final minimaxed eval lower than 0.22, which is better than most engines but still higher than I'd like to see.Alibaba wrote:Hi,
yes the performance of Komodo 5 at this very long time controls is really impressive....
after 7 rounds, here is the new table:
TBOC_5 2012
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8
1 Houdini 1.5a x64 ** 1 ½ 1 ½ ½ ½ ½ 4.5/7 16.00
2 Komodo 5 64-bit 0 ** ½ ½ 1 1 ½ 1 4.5/7 13.75
3 Critter 1.6a 64-bit ½ ½ ** ½ ½ ½ ½ 1 4.0/7 13.25
4 Deep HIARCS 14 WCSC 0 ½ ½ ** ½ 1 1 ½ 4.0/7 12.50
5 Stockfish 2.2.2 JA SSE42 ½ 0 ½ ½ ** ½ ½ ½ 3.0/7 10.25
6 Deep Fritz 13 ½ 0 ½ 0 ½ ** 1 ½ 3.0/7 9.50
7 Deep Rybka 4 x64 ½ ½ ½ 0 ½ 0 ** ½ 2.5/7 9.25
8 Deep Junior 13.3 ½ 0 0 ½ ½ ½ ½ ** 2.5/7 8.50
Regards
Andi
-
Alibaba
- Posts: 1218
- Joined: Mon May 25, 2009 12:16 am
Re: TBOC 5 : very long time cont tour with new komodo hiarcs
Hi Larry,
it might be better to wait until end of the tour to examine the back-white score. At the moment black has 2 more wins.....
by the way, it might be interesting that Junior and Hiarcs evals this position nearly equal, and the main line better for black so they try to avoid playing the main line, but with no good results for white....
Regards
Andi
it might be better to wait until end of the tour to examine the back-white score. At the moment black has 2 more wins.....
by the way, it might be interesting that Junior and Hiarcs evals this position nearly equal, and the main line better for black so they try to avoid playing the main line, but with no good results for white....
Regards
Andi