I philosophically agree, but there is one subtle problem. If the hardware is updated now, it will indirectly punish the SMP engines that did not qualify to round 2. They may have done it with 16 cores (beating the single core), but did not with 3. If you change the rules now, you may find that the single core beat some multicore that may have been competitive with the remaining multi.Modern Times wrote:Your tournament, so your rules and your decision. But a pity not to enable the SMP engines the chance to use extra cores ASAP. The single core engines, well they are in the minority, and if they don't SMP that is an issue they should deal with if they wish to.Martin Thoresen wrote: In other news, the new TCEC computer has been built, a dual CPU Intel Xeon with a total of 16 cores.
It will not be used yet since there are still single threaded engines left in the current Season.
If there are no single threaded engines left for Stage 3 this new hardware will be used from that point on.
I think that sticking to the original rules gives more credibility to the tournament (EDIT: even if this is only psychological). People know what to expect from the beginning to end. Everybody knows what is coming, so everybody has now a set goal to improve and prepare the engines for 16 cores. One of the most important aspects of keeping things consistent, is that if offers the programmers a given "carrot" to follow. I think this is an important contribution. Moving targets are not good for the programmers.
We are all excited to go for the 16 core, but in the long run I think that Martin's decision may end up being wiser. IMHO.
Miguel
