Komodo 9 64-bit 1CPU for CCRL 40/40

Discussion of computer chess matches and engine tournaments.

Moderator: Ras

User avatar
Graham Banks
Posts: 44160
Joined: Sun Feb 26, 2006 10:52 am
Location: Auckland, NZ

Re: Komodo 9 64-bit 1CPU for CCRL 40/40

Post by Graham Banks »

It's worth reminding viewers that ChessGUI reports nps differently from other GUIs.
Think roughly double what it is reporting in Fritz terms.
gbanksnz at gmail.com
User avatar
Graham Banks
Posts: 44160
Joined: Sun Feb 26, 2006 10:52 am
Location: Auckland, NZ

Update after 130 of 650 games

Post by Graham Banks »

Update after 130 of 650 games.

Image

PGN for Games 1-130 - http://kirill-kryukov.com/chess/discuss ... p?id=34588
gbanksnz at gmail.com
User avatar
Graham Banks
Posts: 44160
Joined: Sun Feb 26, 2006 10:52 am
Location: Auckland, NZ

Update after 260 of 650 games

Post by Graham Banks »

Update after 260 games

Image

PGN for Games 131-260 - http://kirill-kryukov.com/chess/discuss ... p?id=34669
gbanksnz at gmail.com
User avatar
Graham Banks
Posts: 44160
Joined: Sun Feb 26, 2006 10:52 am
Location: Auckland, NZ

Update after 390 of 650 games

Post by Graham Banks »

Update after 390 games

Image

PGN for Games 261-390:
http://kirill-kryukov.com/chess/discuss ... p?id=34741
gbanksnz at gmail.com
Frank Quisinsky
Posts: 6907
Joined: Wed Nov 18, 2009 7:16 pm
Location: Gutweiler, Germany
Full name: Frank Quisinsky

Re: Update after 390 of 650 games

Post by Frank Quisinsky »

Rybka & Houdini & Strelka & Bouquet & BlackMamba & Elektro
So many Graham?

Why not Mars and all the others?
Where is the different for you?

Critter and Equinox I can understand. Newer Equinox versions are quiet different in stats to IPP. Main stats are the same but in detail differents in endgames are very clear. The Equinox programmer do here a lot. The Critter programmer not but Critter have nice ideas in the late middlegame. Engine is stronger and stronger with more moves in the late middlegame and can give here nice king attacks, not in the early middlegame, here the older Critter versions are much more aggressive but lost here also many games very fast. With Critter 0.90 I have much more fun as with Critter 1.6a.

To see Hannibal / Sting / Fire / Gull / Stockfish and Komodo in this group of engines isn't very nice. The playing styles from this group of engines to the others are quiet different.

I can't see any logic!
Max interesting is Mars ... engine is very strong and much more aggressive as other IPP based programs. The question here (with Mars) similar to Gullchess? Gullchess is also much more aggressive and have a clearly other style as the most IPP based engines.

And where are all the Stockfish clones?

1:1 ...

:-)

Best
Frank
User avatar
Graham Banks
Posts: 44160
Joined: Sun Feb 26, 2006 10:52 am
Location: Auckland, NZ

Re: Update after 390 of 650 games

Post by Graham Banks »

Frank Quisinsky wrote:1:1 ...

:-)

Best
Frank
:)
gbanksnz at gmail.com
User avatar
Graham Banks
Posts: 44160
Joined: Sun Feb 26, 2006 10:52 am
Location: Auckland, NZ

Update after 520 of 650 games

Post by Graham Banks »

Update after 520 games

Image

PGN for the 8th Cycle - http://kirill-kryukov.com/chess/discuss ... p?id=34822
gbanksnz at gmail.com
User avatar
Graham Banks
Posts: 44160
Joined: Sun Feb 26, 2006 10:52 am
Location: Auckland, NZ

Gauntlet completed

Post by Graham Banks »

gbanksnz at gmail.com
User avatar
Graham Banks
Posts: 44160
Joined: Sun Feb 26, 2006 10:52 am
Location: Auckland, NZ

Further opponents

Post by Graham Banks »

Games against Equinox 3.20 64-bit and Protector 1.8.0 64-bit currently underway with live broadcast in 16066.
gbanksnz at gmail.com