Sadly, that "set in stone" is what makes it so appealing to people - the interface is near guaranteed to never change, avoiding the need for workarounds that XBoard protocol is so fond of.hgm wrote:UCI should be considered a dead protocol, that is set in stone.
icsdrone(ng), polyglot + uci program
Moderator: Ras
-
ZirconiumX
- Posts: 1362
- Joined: Sun Jul 17, 2011 11:14 am
- Full name: Hannah Ravensloft
Re: icsdrone(ng), polyglot + uci program
tu ne cede malis, sed contra audentior ito
-
hgm
- Posts: 28472
- Joined: Fri Mar 10, 2006 10:06 am
- Location: Amsterdam
- Full name: H G Muller
Re: icsdrone(ng), polyglot + uci program
Not sure what work-arounds have to do with adding missing features to a protocol, as the need arises. Or even what work-arounds you refer to.ZirconiumX wrote:Sadly, that "set in stone" is what makes it so appealing to people - the interface is near guaranteed to never change, avoiding the need for workarounds that XBoard protocol is so fond of.