CCRL 40/15, 40/2 and FRC lists updated (25th September 2021)

Discussion of computer chess matches and engine tournaments.

Moderator: Ras

sovaz1997
Posts: 292
Joined: Sun Nov 13, 2016 10:37 am

Re: CCRL 40/15, 40/2 and FRC lists updated (25th September 2021)

Post by sovaz1997 »

Graham Banks wrote: Sun Sep 26, 2021 6:26 pm
sovaz1997 wrote: Sun Sep 26, 2021 4:39 pm Hello, Graham! Zevra v2.4 is also missing in 40/15 (before that there were games from the 8th division of the amateur tournament). Perhaps forgot to add some of the games from some engines.
That's my fault.
I'll ask Ray to reinstate them.
Thanks, Graham! :)
Zevra 2 is my chess engine. Binary, source and description here: https://github.com/sovaz1997/Zevra2
Zevra v2.6 is last version of Zevra: https://github.com/sovaz1997/Zevra2/releases
Eduard
Posts: 1439
Joined: Sat Oct 27, 2018 12:58 am
Location: Germany
Full name: N.N.

Re: CCRL 40/15, 40/2 and FRC lists updated (25th September 2021)

Post by Eduard »

CCRL is a joke. The new Dragon is tested for the unimportant FRC list first instead of standard chess. Weird world. :roll:

How stupid do they think we chess players are?
AndrewGrant
Posts: 1978
Joined: Tue Apr 19, 2016 6:08 am
Location: U.S.A
Full name: Andrew Grant

Re: CCRL 40/15, 40/2 and FRC lists updated (25th September 2021)

Post by AndrewGrant »

Eduard wrote: Sat Oct 02, 2021 1:37 pm CCRL is a joke. The new Dragon is tested for the unimportant FRC list first instead of standard chess. Weird world. :roll:

How stupid do they think we chess players are?
I like the FRC list, and always make sure to get Ray a copy ASAP when I release :shrug:
Uri Blass
Posts: 11170
Joined: Thu Mar 09, 2006 12:37 am
Location: Tel-Aviv Israel

Re: CCRL 40/15, 40/2 and FRC lists updated (25th September 2021)

Post by Uri Blass »

Eduard wrote: Sat Oct 02, 2021 1:37 pm CCRL is a joke. The new Dragon is tested for the unimportant FRC list first instead of standard chess. Weird world. :roll:

How stupid do they think we chess players are?
I do not see the problem.
They are free to test in the order they want to test.

You payed nothing for them to test so you have no right to say that they have to test Dragon for standard chess first.

I also think that specifically for Dragon FRC is more interesting because the claim is that dragon is relatively stronger in FRC and nobody expect Dragon to be stronger than stockfish in standard chess.
amanjpro
Posts: 883
Joined: Sat Mar 13, 2021 1:47 am
Full name: Amanj Sherwany

Re: CCRL 40/15, 40/2 and FRC lists updated (25th September 2021)

Post by amanjpro »

Eduard wrote: Sat Oct 02, 2021 1:37 pm CCRL is a joke. The new Dragon is tested for the unimportant FRC list first instead of standard chess. Weird world. :roll:

How stupid do they think we chess players are?
Of course they are! they didn't follow your PARTICULAR taste! Only morons ignore your wishes! You know what? nobody deserves your attention, you are too good to live in this society! go find a cave :P