These results are consistent, Pohl's results being more accurate due to the far larger sample size. There's no conspiracy as you seem to insinuate. Many others have attempted to explain this to you previously. Your 100 games tests against a single opponent are not statistically significant.
Maybe I'm wasting my time...
1.-An opinion much (much) more informed than yours:
What has Uris quote to do with your 'problem'? Are you really thinking it is relevant here, because it mentions the game number 100?
Read Uris quote again, it is about the given result obtained there. Yours is just statistical noise instead and this does not even
consider your often very quirky openings. (all of your last shown examples were more or less book wins - and ofc always against SF which
you seem to hate)
Of course if all, who don't agree with you are 'unpleasant company' for you the others must be wrong.
Your friend Chessalex sure will help you now. May be you'll find a forum which levels 'opinions' above science,
they are rising fast nowadays. They need more conspiracists.
Leave Sylwy alone jerk...
He's been posting here for many years and I personally enjoy his stuff.
Have you got nothing better to do than troll here and attack an old man who's having fun?
I guess you think it makes you look smart?
connor_mcmonigle wrote: ↑Mon Nov 29, 2021 5:48 pm
These results are consistent, Pohl's results being more accurate due to the far larger sample size. There's no conspiracy as you seem to insinuate. Many others have attempted to explain this to you previously. Your 100 games tests against a single opponent are not statistically significant.
Maybe I'm wasting my time...
Sylwy is the same person who a few weeks ago was testing the illegal Stockfish clone Eman.
So very naughty of him! Cast him to the dungeons! (says Madeleine the super troll! )
Guenther wrote: ↑Mon Nov 29, 2021 6:38 pm
What has Uris quote to do with your 'problem'? Are you really thinking it is relevant here, because it mentions the game number 100?
Read Uris quote again, it is about the given result obtained there. Yours is just statistical noise instead and this does not even
consider your often very quirky openings. (all of your last shown examples were more or less book wins - and ofc always against SF which
you seem to hate)
Of course if all, who don't agree with you are 'unpleasant company' for you the others must be wrong.
Your friend Chessalex sure will help you now. May be you'll find a forum which levels 'opinions' above science,
they are rising fast nowadays. They need more conspiracists.
Wow! I was really thinking that someone was missing in the thread! Opinions that do not interest me.
Some advice Sylwy...
The very wise American author Mark Twain once said:
"Never argue with a fool; onlookers may not be able to tell the difference."
)