Robbolito 0.09 New Edition VS Rybka 3

[sockmonkey]

Ok, we must agree to disagree. You tolerate the mystery offenders and I dont.

Point missed - this is wrong and diversionary (again). I don't tolerate "offenders" because I don't see any here. First, prove the offense -- only then should there be talk about offenders.

Jeremy

[Rolf]

Ok, we must agree to disagree. You tolerate the mystery offenders and I dont.

Point missed - this is wrong and diversionary (again). I don't tolerate "offenders" because I don't see any here. First, prove the offense -- only then should there be talk about offenders.

Jeremy

No need to talk about it. Vas reported it and what then happened is not interesting. NB that they contacted him several times, not just once. But he could not be provocated and made just the single declaration. Everything else, what you too would now want, is moot. If I say offenders I am specifically refering to these email contacters, blackmailers. Over several weeks or months. Ok, call it what you want. I made my argument against your say simplification. I believe in a crime. Ok, you are not forced to believe that but this is valid vice versa. Have a nice week.

[sockmonkey]

I believe in a crime.

At last we come to the truth of the matter. Credo in unum Deum. Who can argue against blind faith?

Jeremy

[gerold]

This version is private, not supposed to be released yet. I am testing it.

Am I wrong to consider this rude? I mean what's the point of announcing results of a private engine. You know from the title people are going to enter the thread looking for a download and then be disappointed to see it is private.

Maybe it wouldn't irritate me so much if the title included "New Edition (private)".

Well, next time I suppose it will be best not to mention of any other private version, we Robbo testers receive, that way people like '' you'' won't be offended. BTW, are you a girl, since I don't mention of saying anything which might have offended you....

Is there much diff. between Robb g3 and the latest version.
I have run test Taskist vs.Robb g3 and the score was even
in 50 games. 10/0 time.

Best
Gerold.

P.S. Thanks for the post.

Is there any improvement in the newer versions of Robbo.
Not that i can see.

Tankist 1.2 vs.Robbo 009. w32. 5-5-56. 50percent each.
Sure lots of draws.

Best,

Gerold.

[kingliveson]

R3 VS. RL009 1+0

Code: Select all

1 RobboLito 0.09 x64        :   14   50 (+ 17,= 20,- 13), 54.0 %

Rybka 3 x64                   :  50 (+ 17,= 20,- 13), 54.0 %

2 Rybka 3 x64               :  -14   50 (+ 13,= 20,- 17), 46.0 %

RobboLito 0.09 x64            :  50 (+ 13,= 20,- 17), 46.0 %

The test was conducted using KLOECOA00E97V suite.

-25 positions with switched colors
-ponder on
-no egtb
-64 mb hash
-Rybka : 2 Cores
-Robbolito: 1 Core
-AMD Phenom II 940 @ 3.6 GHz


Games

[Dr.Wael Deeb]

hahaha....

what a clone Unc Rolf is.

oooooops..

I meant a clown.

What are you talking about? Is your position so untenable that you have to resort to non sequiters to avoid the final collapse of your argument?

[Rolf]

I believe in a crime.

At last we come to the truth of the matter. Credo in unum Deum. Who can argue against blind faith?

Jeremy

What a crap. But trusting someone who never lied to me is the best I can do as a human being. But you prefer hidden anons. Let's stop it. We cannot come closer on this. In fact the short quote is like a lie. But if you hate Vas it's normal that you hate me too. And I'm proud of. Viel Feind viel Ehr.

[sockmonkey]

I believe in a crime.

At last we come to the truth of the matter. Credo in unum Deum. Who can argue against blind faith?

Jeremy

What a crap. But trusting someone who never lied to me is the best I can do as a human being. But you prefer hidden anons. Let's stop it. We cannot come closer on this. In fact the short quote is like a lie. But if you hate Vas it's normal that you hate me too. And I'm proud of. Viel Feind viel Ehr.

You take this all very personally, Rolf, and it's not meant that way. In fact, your accusation of "hate" is so off the mark that it merits a special mention. You are diverting the argument from a matter of facts and events into some emotional world that has nothing to do with the discussion at hand. I certainly don't hate Vas (I've never even had the presumable pleasure of talking to him), but I don't harbor any particular good will for him, either (nor bad will, just to make that clear).

He's a software designer and a businessman and has to work for my loyalty or good will as a customer, just like everyone else I buy software from. I happen to disagree with the politics of how his business has handled the Ippolit threat, and would rather take my chess euros to a different business, given what is currently known about the current state of affairs.

Anyway, we are clearly at loggerheads, so I'll let you get on with your life. But let me repeat what I wrote a few weeks ago: stop telling us what to do. You've made your choices, and explained your reasoning behind them. That's great, I happen to disagree. And let's be honest. You're not supporting Vas -- you're supporting your own biases and prejudices (which is natural, of course), and there's no reason to expect that I (or anyone else) should do so, as well.

Jeremy

[Dr.Wael Deeb]

I believe in a crime.

At last we come to the truth of the matter. Credo in unum Deum. Who can argue against blind faith?

Jeremy

What a crap. But trusting someone who never lied to me is the best I can do as a human being. But you prefer hidden anons. Let's stop it. We cannot come closer on this. In fact the short quote is like a lie. But if you hate Vas it's normal that you hate me too. And I'm proud of. Viel Feind viel Ehr.

You take this all very personally, Rolf, and it's not meant that way. In fact, your accusation of "hate" is so off the mark that it merits a special mention. You are diverting the argument from a matter of facts and events into some emotional world that has nothing to do with the discussion at hand. I certainly don't hate Vas (I've never even had the presumable pleasure of talking to him), but I don't harbor any particular good will for him, either (nor bad will, just to make that clear).

He's a software designer and a businessman and has to work for my loyalty or good will as a customer, just like everyone else I buy software from. I happen to disagree with the politics of how his business has handled the Ippolit threat, and would rather take my chess euros to a different business, given what is currently known about the current state of affairs.

Anyway, we are clearly at loggerheads, so I'll let you get on with your life. But let me repeat what I wrote a few weeks ago: stop telling us what to do. You've made your choices, and explained your reasoning behind them. That's great, I happen to disagree. And let's be honest. You're not supporting Vas -- you're supporting your own biases and prejudices (which is natural, of course), and there's no reason to expect that I (or anyone else) should do so, as well.

Jeremy

Don'r bother Jeremy,in a couple of months there will be major changes in the computer chess world and the consequences of these changes will wipe out bugs like Rolf for good....
Dr.D

[Harvey Williamson]

your accusation of "hate" is so off the mark that it merits a special mention. You are diverting the argument from a matter of facts and events into some emotional world that has nothing to do with the discussion at hand.
You're not supporting Vas -- you're supporting your own biases and prejudices (which is natural, of course), and there's no reason to expect that I (or anyone else) should do so, as well.

Jeremy

Could not agree more. Rolf also accused me of hating Vas. I think Rolf does far more damage than good in this debate.