(and of course to all authors of legitimate engines, no matter how strong).
We were almost forgotten lately.
The programmers of engines of all strengths deserve our support and gratitude. Don't ever feel discouraged.
It seems "strength" has surpassed all else in interest.
I would think for most players just having different engines that play unique styles would be more interesting to study. Some of the "lesser" engines are more colorful
With open source we will reach a time in the future where all top engines will play the same
Besides most engines beat %99.9 percent of us anyway. Can't let all the science ruin the "art"
Can you speak for yourself please
_No one can hit as hard as life.But it ain’t about how hard you can hit.It’s about how hard you can get hit and keep moving forward.How much you can take and keep moving forward….
(and of course to all authors of legitimate engines, no matter how strong).
We were almost forgotten lately.
The programmers of engines of all strengths deserve our support and gratitude. Don't ever feel discouraged.
It seems "strength" has surpassed all else in interest.
I would think for most players just having different engines that play unique styles would be more interesting to study. Some of the "lesser" engines are more colorful
With open source we will reach a time in the future where all top engines will play the same
Besides most engines beat %99.9 percent of us anyway. Can't let all the science ruin the "art"
Can you speak for yourself please
OK, you are one of the .1
“He knew all the tricks, dramatic irony, metaphor, pathos, puns, parody, litotes and... satire. He was vicious”
rlsuth wrote:Of course, if you were of a suspicious mind, you'd wonder if there was no better way than to ensure good sales of Rybka 4 than to have new programs from "unknown authors" surpass the previous version in strength.
I'm just saying ....
If I was Vas I would not release Rybka 4 until being completely sure it couldn't be hacked/disasembled and source code published as it happened to Rybka 3.
rlsuth wrote:Of course, if you were of a suspicious mind, you'd wonder if there was no better way than to ensure good sales of Rybka 4 than to have new programs from "unknown authors" surpass the previous version in strength.
I'm just saying ....
If I was Vas I would not release Rybka 4 until being completely sure it couldn't be hacked/disasembled and source code published as it happened to Rybka 3.
....as it happened to Rybka 3
So you do believe Vasik after all
_No one can hit as hard as life.But it ain’t about how hard you can hit.It’s about how hard you can get hit and keep moving forward.How much you can take and keep moving forward….
rlsuth wrote:Of course, if you were of a suspicious mind, you'd wonder if there was no better way than to ensure good sales of Rybka 4 than to have new programs from "unknown authors" surpass the previous version in strength.
I'm just saying ....
If I was Vas I would not release Rybka 4 until being completely sure it couldn't be hacked/disasembled and source code published as it happened to Rybka 3.
....as it happened to Rybka 3
So you do believe Vasik after all
rlsuth wrote:Of course, if you were of a suspicious mind, you'd wonder if there was no better way than to ensure good sales of Rybka 4 than to have new programs from "unknown authors" surpass the previous version in strength.
I'm just saying ....
If I was Vas I would not release Rybka 4 until being completely sure it couldn't be hacked/disasembled and source code published as it happened to Rybka 3.
....as it happened to Rybka 3
So you do believe Vasik after all
Of course
I am astonished regarding the brain wash procedure this guy has applied to his customers....I mean even his lies are obvious,there are still people who believe in him....
Rybka 3+ wasn't released as he promised,then he lost the Rybka 3 source code and that's why he won't release Rybka 3+,not that he don't want to,it's just he can't....what a sore loser
Dr.D
_No one can hit as hard as life.But it ain’t about how hard you can hit.It’s about how hard you can get hit and keep moving forward.How much you can take and keep moving forward….
Andres Valverde wrote:
If I was Vas I would not release Rybka 4 until being completely sure it couldn't be hacked/disasembled and source code published as it happened to Rybka 3.
lol, no such thing as hack proof, not unless a new machine language is invented. And that too will be hacked
metax wrote: I am pretty sure no new Rybka version will be released that is NOT the strongest chess engine in the world.
I would advice Rybka to quickly get used to being 3rd or 4th.
RobboLito MP and Igorrit may soon top the league for long.
Matthias.
In terms of Historical perspective
Rybka has lead the rating race for about 4 Years(Dec.2005-Dec.2009)
so about 4 years in total..
however this pales in comparison to Richard Langs commercial chess engines which were the strongest engines that money could buy for 7 consecutive years
1985-1991
metax wrote: I am pretty sure no new Rybka version will be released that is NOT the strongest chess engine in the world.
I would advice Rybka to quickly get used to being 3rd or 4th.
RobboLito MP and Igorrit may soon top the league for long.
Matthias.
In terms of Historical perspective
Rybka has lead the rating race for about 4 Years(Dec.2005-Dec.2009)
so about 4 years in total..
however this pales in comparison to Richard Langs commercial chess engines which were the strongest engines that money could buy for 7 consecutive years
1985-1991
_No one can hit as hard as life.But it ain’t about how hard you can hit.It’s about how hard you can get hit and keep moving forward.How much you can take and keep moving forward….
