Discussion of anything and everything relating to chess playing software and machines.
Moderator: Ras
zullil
Posts: 6442Joined: Tue Jan 09, 2007 12:31 amLocation: PA USAFull name: Louis Zulli
Post by zullil Thu Feb 25, 2010 2:56 am
alpha123 wrote: zullil wrote: alpha123 wrote: In opening position (after white plays 1. e4):
Google Chrome 4 NPS: 199384 Ply: 9
Opera 10.10 NPS: 31540 Ply: 9
Firefox 3.6 NPS: 30313 Ply: 7
Internet Explorer 8: 12513 Ply: 7
Latest stable versions of all browsers were used.
Hardware:
Windows 7 Home Premium 64-bit
Intel Core 2 Quad Q8300 @ 2.50gHz
6GB DDR2
No CPU intensive tasks were running during the benchmark. Tests were conducted in this order:
Firefox, Chrome, Opera, IE.
Peter
Safari-4.0.4 (64 bit)
Nodes:264129 Score:-120 Ply:10 NPS:263865.1348651349 e7e5
Mac OS X 10.6.2 (Snow Leopard)
Dual quad core Xeon E5520 (Nehalem) @ 2.26GHz
6GB 1066 MHz DDR3
Must be the Nehalem. I didn't think Safari was so fast
.
That's pretty impressive. What does Chrome get on your hardware, I want to see if it's just the hardware or Safari has super powers.
Peter
Here's the official result from my 2GHz Core 2 Duo MacBook using Safari 4.0.4 (64 bit)
Nodes:175128 Score:-70 Ply:9 NPS:174953.04695304699 e7e5 g1f3 b8c6 d2d4 e5d4 f3d4 d7d5 b1c3
gladius
Posts: 568Joined: Tue Dec 12, 2006 10:10 amFull name: Gary Linscott
Post by gladius Thu Feb 25, 2010 11:04 am
I've updated it so it's a bit stronger (no more consecutive null-moves). Also, it now records a PGN for you, if you want to save it for posterity
.
mhalstern
Posts: 484Joined: Wed Nov 18, 2009 1:09 am
Post by mhalstern Thu Feb 25, 2010 7:18 pm
Can you make it winboard or uci compatible so we can have more fun with it.
swami
Posts: 6659Joined: Thu Mar 09, 2006 4:21 am
Post by swami Thu Feb 25, 2010 7:36 pm
Hi Gary,
gladius
Posts: 568Joined: Tue Dec 12, 2006 10:10 amFull name: Gary Linscott
Post by gladius Thu Feb 25, 2010 9:51 pm
mhalstern wrote: Can you make it winboard or uci compatible so we can have more fun with it.
I'm afraid that would be a bit tricky. You would need a native javascript execution environment, which sort of defeats the purpose of a web app. I could make it output the UCI commands as text, and you could paste them into the GUI, but that's not so great
.
gladius
Posts: 568Joined: Tue Dec 12, 2006 10:10 amFull name: Gary Linscott
Post by gladius Thu Feb 25, 2010 9:54 pm
swami wrote: Hi Gary,
I lost the source to 2.20 in a hard drive crash, so not that version. I have a complete rewrite which is stronger, but I don't see much point in releasing it.
alpha123
Posts: 660Joined: Sat Dec 05, 2009 5:13 amLocation: Colorado, USA
Post by alpha123 Thu Feb 25, 2010 10:03 pm
zullil wrote: alpha123 wrote: zullil wrote: alpha123 wrote: In opening position (after white plays 1. e4):
Google Chrome 4 NPS: 199384 Ply: 9
Opera 10.10 NPS: 31540 Ply: 9
Firefox 3.6 NPS: 30313 Ply: 7
Internet Explorer 8: 12513 Ply: 7
Latest stable versions of all browsers were used.
Hardware:
Windows 7 Home Premium 64-bit
Intel Core 2 Quad Q8300 @ 2.50gHz
6GB DDR2
No CPU intensive tasks were running during the benchmark. Tests were conducted in this order:
Firefox, Chrome, Opera, IE.
Peter
Safari-4.0.4 (64 bit)
Nodes:264129 Score:-120 Ply:10 NPS:263865.1348651349 e7e5
Mac OS X 10.6.2 (Snow Leopard)
Dual quad core Xeon E5520 (Nehalem) @ 2.26GHz
6GB 1066 MHz DDR3
Must be the Nehalem. I didn't think Safari was so fast
.
That's pretty impressive. What does Chrome get on your hardware, I want to see if it's just the hardware or Safari has super powers.
Peter
Here's the official result from my 2GHz Core 2 Duo MacBook using Safari 4.0.4 (64 bit)
Nodes:175128 Score:-70 Ply:9 NPS:174953.04695304699 e7e5 g1f3 b8c6 d2d4 e5d4 f3d4 d7d5 b1c3
Sadly, Chrome under Linux (Ubuntu 9.10) seems slower:
Ply:9 Score:-60 Nodes:91857 NPS:89008.72093023255 e5 d4 exd4 Qxd4 Nc6 Qd2 Nf6 Nc3
I could only find Chrome 5 beta for Linux, but maybe the stable version will beat Safari when in comes out...... Opera is MUCH slower under Linux and Firefox is about comparable.
Peter
.
.